• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质子泵抑制剂治疗后仍持续存在且症状强烈的胃食管反流病患者的负担:2007 年全国健康和健康调查的事后分析。

Burden of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with persistent and intense symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor therapy: A post hoc analysis of the 2007 national health and wellness survey.

机构信息

AstraZeneca RD, Mlndal, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2011 Oct 1;31(10):703-15. doi: 10.2165/11595480-000000000-00000.

DOI:10.2165/11595480-000000000-00000
PMID:21756007
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Research on the negative impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) on the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and resource utilization of patients with persistent and intense GORD symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is lacking. The aim of this study was to describe the population of patients with GORD with persistent moderate-to-severe symptoms despite ongoing PPI therapy, and to compare their HR-QOL and healthcare resource use with patients with low GORD symptom load during ongoing PPI therapy.

METHODS

In this post hoc analysis of the 2007 National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS), PPI-compliant (≥22 days with PPI use in the past month) European (France, Germany and the UK) and US respondents with physician-diagnosed GORD were stratified into those with persistent and intense GORD symptoms, those with low symptom load, or an intermediate group.

RESULTS

5672 PPI-compliant respondents were identified (persistent and intense symptoms, n = 1741; low symptom load, n = 1805; intermediate group, n = 2126). Respondents with persistent and intense symptoms had poorer HR-QOL than patients with a low symptom load, but none of the differences were statistically significant. Respondents with persistent and intense symptoms also reported lower work productivity (all countries; significant difference [p < 0.01] only in the US), greater activity impairment (all countries; significant difference [p < 0.01] only in the US) and more hours missed from work due to health problems (US, UK and Germany; significant difference [p < 0.01] only in the US). In the UK and US, respondents with persistent and intense symptoms reported significantly more visits to both primary-care physicians and specialists than respondents with a low symptom load (all p < 0.01). Additionally, US respondents with persistent and intense symptoms reported significantly more emergency room visits (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The 2007 NHWS gives support to the hypothesis that persistent and intense GORD symptoms despite PPI therapy have a significant and negative impact on both HR-QOL and healthcare resource utilization. These findings outline the need for new treatment options for symptomatic GORD patients taking PPI therapy.

摘要

背景和目的

研究质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗后仍存在持续性和剧烈胃食管反流病(GORD)对患者健康相关生活质量(HR-QOL)和资源利用的负面影响的研究较少。本研究旨在描述 PPI 治疗后仍存在持续性中度至重度 GORD 症状的患者人群,并比较这些患者与 PPI 治疗期间低 GORD 症状负担患者的 HR-QOL 和医疗资源使用情况。

方法

在 2007 年全国健康和健康调查(NHWS)的事后分析中,符合 PPI 标准(过去一个月中有≥22 天使用 PPI)的欧洲(法国、德国和英国)和美国有医生诊断为 GORD 的受访者根据持续性和剧烈 GORD 症状、低症状负担或中间组进行分层。

结果

确定了 5672 名符合 PPI 标准的受访者(持续性和剧烈症状组,n=1741;低症状负担组,n=1805;中间组,n=2126)。持续性和剧烈症状患者的 HR-QOL 较低症状负担患者差,但无统计学差异。持续性和剧烈症状患者的工作生产力也较低(所有国家;仅在美国有显著差异[P<0.01]),活动能力受损更严重(所有国家;仅在美国有显著差异[P<0.01]),因健康问题旷工时间更长(美国、英国和德国;仅在美国有显著差异[P<0.01])。在英国和美国,持续性和剧烈症状患者报告的初级保健医生和专科医生就诊次数明显多于低症状负担患者(所有 P<0.01)。此外,持续性和剧烈症状的美国受访者报告的急诊就诊次数明显更多(P<0.01)。

结论

2007 年 NHWS 支持这样一种假设,即在 PPI 治疗后仍存在持续性和剧烈的 GORD 症状对 HR-QOL 和医疗资源的利用都有显著的负面影响。这些发现表明需要为接受 PPI 治疗的有症状 GORD 患者提供新的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Burden of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with persistent and intense symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor therapy: A post hoc analysis of the 2007 national health and wellness survey.质子泵抑制剂治疗后仍持续存在且症状强烈的胃食管反流病患者的负担:2007 年全国健康和健康调查的事后分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2011 Oct 1;31(10):703-15. doi: 10.2165/11595480-000000000-00000.
2
The burden of disrupting gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a database study in US and European cohorts.胃食管反流病负担:美国和欧洲队列的数据库研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(3):167-78. doi: 10.2165/11531670-000000000-00000.
3
Cost and burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease among patients with persistent symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor therapy: an observational study in France.质子泵抑制剂治疗后症状持续的胃食管反流病患者的成本和负担:法国的一项观察性研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Feb 28;13:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-39.
4
Effects of structured follow-up and of more effective acid inhibitory treatment in the management of GORD patients in a Swedish primary-care setting: a randomized, open-label study.在瑞典初级保健环境中管理 GORD 患者的结构化随访和更有效的抑酸治疗效果:一项随机、开放标签研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31(3):181-9. doi: 10.2165/11586330-000000000-00000.
5
Heartburn in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Germany and Sweden: a study on patients' burden of disease.德国和瑞典胃食管反流病患者的烧心症状:一项关于患者疾病负担的研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(15):1091-102. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321150-00003.
6
Relationship between symptom load of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and health-related quality of life, work productivity, resource utilization and concomitant diseases: survey of a US cohort.胃食管反流病症状负荷与健康相关生活质量、工作生产力、资源利用及伴发疾病之间的关系:一项美国队列研究
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 May;27(10):960-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03671.x. Epub 2008 Feb 29.
7
Patient selection for therapy reduction after long-term daily proton pump inhibitor treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: trial and error.长期每日质子泵抑制剂治疗胃食管反流病后减少治疗的患者选择:反复试验。
Digestion. 2013;87(2):85-90. doi: 10.1159/000345144. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
8
The effectiveness of esomeprazole 40 mg in patients with persistent symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease following treatment with a full dose proton pump inhibitor.埃索美拉唑40毫克在全剂量质子泵抑制剂治疗后仍有持续性胃食管反流病症状患者中的疗效。
Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Dec;62(12):1844-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01923.x.
9
Acid and non-acid reflux in patients with persistent symptoms despite acid suppressive therapy: a multicentre study using combined ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring.尽管进行了抑酸治疗仍有持续症状的患者的酸反流和非酸反流:一项使用联合动态阻抗-pH监测的多中心研究
Gut. 2006 Oct;55(10):1398-402. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.087668. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
10
The impact of treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life: a literature review.胃食管反流病治疗对健康相关生活质量的影响:一项文献综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(11):769-90. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321110-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug treatment strategies for erosive esophagitis in adults: a narrative review.成人糜烂性食管炎的药物治疗策略:叙述性综述
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul 23;10:54. doi: 10.21037/tgh-24-168. eCollection 2025.
2
Individualizing the choice of surgical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.个体化选择胃食管反流病的手术治疗方法。
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 1;41(4):245-250. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000001082. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
3
Fundoplication: Old Concept for Novel Challenges?胃底折叠术:应对新挑战的古老概念?

本文引用的文献

1
A novel reflux inhibitor lesogaberan (AZD3355) as add-on treatment in patients with GORD with persistent reflux symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor therapy: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.一种新型的反流抑制剂 lesogaberan(AZD3355)作为质子泵抑制剂治疗后仍存在反流症状的 GORD 患者的附加治疗:一项随机安慰剂对照试验。
Gut. 2011 Sep;60(9):1182-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.235630. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
2
Effects of lesogaberan on reflux and lower esophageal sphincter function in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.莱菔硫烷对胃食管反流病患者反流和食管下括约肌功能的影响。
Gastroenterology. 2010 Aug;139(2):409-17. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.04.051. Epub 2010 May 5.
3
Visc Med. 2024 Oct;40(5):236-241. doi: 10.1159/000536566. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
4
A scientometrics analysis and visualization of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease.难治性胃食管反流病的科学计量学分析与可视化
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 30;15:1393526. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1393526. eCollection 2024.
5
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2021.2021 年胃食管反流病循证临床实践指南。
J Gastroenterol. 2022 Apr;57(4):267-285. doi: 10.1007/s00535-022-01861-z. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
6
Heartburn Center Set-Up in a Community Setting: Engineering and Execution.社区环境下的烧心中心设置:设计与实施
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 10;8:662007. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.662007. eCollection 2021.
7
Complete endoscopic removal of an eroded magnetic sphincter augmentation device.完全通过内镜取出侵蚀性磁括约肌增强装置。
VideoGIE. 2021 Sep 21;6(10):450-453. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2021.05.023. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
Mind the Gap: Current Treatment Alternatives for GERD Patients Failing Medical Treatment and Not Ready for a Fundoplication.注意差距:正在接受医疗治疗且尚未准备好进行胃底折叠术的 GERD 患者的当前替代治疗选择。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Dec 16;31(2):264-276. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000888.
9
More beads, more peristaltic reserve, better outcomes: factors predicting postoperative dysphagia after magnetic sphincter augmentation.珠子越多,蠕动储备越好,结果越好:预测磁括约肌增强术后吞咽困难的因素
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5295-5302. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08013-5. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
10
Magnetic sphincter augmentation: Optimal patient selection and referral care pathways.磁括约肌增强术:最佳患者选择及转诊护理路径
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Aug 16;11(8):472-476. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i8.472.
Effect of lesogaberan, a novel GABA(B)-receptor agonist, on transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations in male subjects.
新型 GABA(B)受体激动剂 lesogaberan 对男性受试者短暂性食管下括约肌松弛的影响。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jun;31(11):1208-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04283.x. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
4
Upper GI tract findings in patients with heartburn in whom proton pump inhibitor treatment failed versus those not receiving antireflux treatment.胃食管反流病患者质子泵抑制剂治疗失败与未接受抗反流治疗者上消化道的发现。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jan;71(1):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.08.024.
5
American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.美国胃肠病学会关于胃食管反流病管理的医学立场声明。
Gastroenterology. 2008 Oct;135(4):1383-1391, 1391.e1-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.045.
6
Relationship between symptom load of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and health-related quality of life, work productivity, resource utilization and concomitant diseases: survey of a US cohort.胃食管反流病症状负荷与健康相关生活质量、工作生产力、资源利用及伴发疾病之间的关系:一项美国队列研究
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 May;27(10):960-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03671.x. Epub 2008 Feb 29.
7
Objective measurement of work absence and on-the-job productivity: a case-control study of US employees with and without gastroesophageal reflux disease.工作缺勤和在职生产力的客观测量:一项针对患有和未患有胃食管反流病的美国员工的病例对照研究。
J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Jan;50(1):25-31. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31815dba5a.
8
A randomized, comparative trial of a potassium-competitive acid blocker (AZD0865) and esomeprazole for the treatment of patients with nonerosive reflux disease.一项关于钾离子竞争性酸阻滞剂(AZD0865)与埃索美拉唑治疗非糜烂性反流病患者的随机对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jan;103(1):20-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01544.x.
9
A randomized, comparative study of three doses of AZD0865 and esomeprazole for healing of reflux esophagitis.三种剂量的AZD0865与埃索美拉唑治疗反流性食管炎的随机对照研究
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Dec;5(12):1385-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.08.014. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
10
Cost of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease to the employer: a perspective from the United States.胃食管反流病给雇主带来的成本:来自美国的视角
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Sep 15;26(6):889-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03428.x.