Department of Kinesiology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011 Aug;8(8):473-7. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.590743.
This study compared physiological responses and total work tolerance time following forearm submersion (FS) or leg submersion (LS) in cool water, after performing work in a hot environment while wearing fire fighting protective clothing (FPC). Participants walked at 3.5 mph on a treadmill in a hot environment (WBGT 32.8 ± 0.9°C) until a rectal temperature (T(rec)) of 38.5°C was reached. Participants were then subjected to one of two peripheral cooling interventions, in a counterbalanced order. Forearms or lower legs were submerged in water (16.9 ± 0.8°C) for a total of 20 min, followed by a work tolerance trial. Results indicated no significant difference (p = 0.052) between work tolerance time (LS = 21.36 ± 5.35 min vs. FS = 16.27 ± 5.56 min). Similarly, there was no significant difference for T(rec) (p = 0.65), heart rate (HR) (p = 0.79), mean skin temperature (T(sk)) (p = 0.68), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) (p = 0.54). However, LS ratings of thermal comfort (RTC) at Minute 14 (p = 0.03) were significantly lower for LS (10 ± 1) vs. FS (12 ± 1). Results indicate little difference between FS and LS for physiological measures. Despite a lack of statistical significance a 5-min (24%) increase was found during the work tolerance time following LS.
本研究比较了在穿着消防服(FPC)处于热环境下工作后,将前臂(FS)或小腿(LS)浸入冷水中时的生理反应和总耐受工作时间。参与者在热环境(WBGT 32.8 ± 0.9°C)下以 3.5 英里/小时的速度在跑步机上行走,直到直肠温度(Trec)达到 38.5°C。然后,参与者按照平衡的顺序接受两种外周冷却干预措施之一。前臂或小腿总共浸入 16.9 ± 0.8°C 的水中 20 分钟,然后进行耐受工作试验。结果表明,耐受工作时间(LS = 21.36 ± 5.35 分钟 vs. FS = 16.27 ± 5.56 分钟)之间无显著差异(p = 0.052)。同样,Trec(p = 0.65)、心率(HR)(p = 0.79)、平均皮肤温度(Tsk)(p = 0.68)和感知用力等级(RPE)(p = 0.54)之间也无显著差异。然而,LS 在第 14 分钟的热舒适等级(RTC)(p = 0.03)显著较低(LS 为 10 ± 1,FS 为 12 ± 1)。结果表明,FS 和 LS 之间在生理测量方面差异不大。尽管在 LS 后的耐受工作时间内发现增加了 5 分钟(24%),但无统计学意义。