Jayakumar A, Rohini S, Naveen A, Haritha A, Reddy Krishnanjeneya
Department of Periodontics, Sri Sai College of Dental Surgery, Vikarabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2010 Jul;14(3):181-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.75914.
Attempts to successfully regenerate lost alveolar bone have always been a clinician's dream. Angular defects, at least, have a fairer chance, but the same cannot be said about horizontal bone loss. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of horizontal alveolar bone loss and vertical bone defects in periodontal patients; and later, to correlate it with the treatment modalities available in the literature for horizontal and vertical bone defects.
The study was conducted in two parts. Part I was the radiographic evaluation of 150 orthopantomographs (OPGs) (of patients diagnosed with chronic periodontitis and seeking periodontal care), which were digitized and read using the AutoCAD 2006 software. All the periodontitis-affected teeth were categorized as teeth with vertical defects (if the defect angle was ≤45° and defect depth was ≥3 mm) or as having horizontal bone loss. Part II of the study comprised search of the literature on treatment modalities for horizontal and vertical bone loss in four selected periodontal journals.
Out of the 150 OPGs studied, 54 (36%) OPGs showed one or more vertical defects. Totally, 3,371 teeth were studied, out of which horizontal bone loss was found in 3,107 (92.2%) teeth, and vertical defects were found only in 264 (7.8%) of the teeth, which was statistically significant (P<.001). Search of the selected journals revealed 477 papers have addressed the treatment modalities for vertical and horizontal types of bone loss specifically. Out of the 477 papers, 461 (96.3%) have addressed vertical bone loss, and 18 (3.7%) have addressed treatment options for horizontal bone loss. Two papers have addressed both types of bone loss and are included in both categories.
Horizontal bone loss is more prevalent than vertical bone loss but has been sidelined by researchers as very few papers have been published on the subject of regenerative treatment modalities for this type of bone loss. This study should be an impetus for greater attention to an otherwise ubiquitous periodontal challenge.
成功再生缺失的牙槽骨一直是临床医生的梦想。至少角形缺损有更大的成功机会,但水平骨丧失情况并非如此。本研究的目的是评估牙周病患者水平牙槽骨丧失和垂直骨缺损的患病率;随后,将其与文献中针对水平和垂直骨缺损的治疗方式相关联。
本研究分两部分进行。第一部分是对150张全景曲面断层片(OPG)(来自被诊断为慢性牙周炎并寻求牙周治疗的患者)进行影像学评估,这些片子被数字化并使用AutoCAD 2006软件进行解读。所有受牙周炎影响的牙齿被分类为有垂直缺损的牙齿(如果缺损角度≤45°且缺损深度≥3毫米)或有水平骨丧失。研究的第二部分包括在四种选定的牙周病期刊中搜索关于水平和垂直骨丧失治疗方式的文献。
在研究的150张OPG中,54张(36%)显示一个或多个垂直缺损。总共研究了3371颗牙齿,其中3107颗(92.2%)牙齿存在水平骨丧失,仅264颗(7.8%)牙齿存在垂直缺损,这具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。对选定期刊的搜索显示,有477篇论文专门论述了垂直和水平类型骨丧失的治疗方式。在这477篇论文中,461篇(96.3%)论述了垂直骨丧失,18篇(3.7%)论述了水平骨丧失的治疗选择。有两篇论文论述了两种类型的骨丧失,被归入两个类别。
水平骨丧失比垂直骨丧失更普遍,但一直被研究人员忽视,因为关于这种类型骨丧失的再生治疗方式的论文发表极少。本研究应促使人们更加关注这一普遍存在的牙周挑战。