TATinMED Research and the University of Michigan, USA.
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Jun;17 Suppl 8:S235-48.
To evaluate the healthcare costs associated with treatment of opioid-dependence disorder with medications versus no medication, and with the 4 agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Retrospective claims database analysis.
Eligible adults with opioid dependence were identified from a large US health plan and the PharMetrics Integrated Database. Data included all medical and pharmacy claims at all available healthcare sites. Case-mix adjustment was applied using baseline demographic, clinical, and healthcare utilization variables for 13,316 patients; half of these patients used an FDA-approved medication for opioid dependence. A similar comparison was performed among 10,513 patients treated with extended-release naltrexone (NTX-XR) (n = 156) prior to FDA approval for opioid dependence or with a medication approved at the time: oral naltrexone (NTX) (n = 845), buprenorphine (n = 7596), or methadone (n = 1916). Analyses calculated 6-month persistence, utilization, and paid claims for opioid-dependence medications, detoxification and rehabilitation, opioid-related and non-related inpatient admissions, outpatient services, and total costs.
Medication was associated with fewer inpatient admissions of all types. Despite higher costs for medications, total healthcare costs, including inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy costs, were 29% lower for patients who received a medication for opioid dependence versus patients treated without medication. Patients given XR-NTX had fewer opioid-related and non-opioid-related hospitalizations than patients receiving oral medications. Despite higher costs for XR-NTX, total healthcare costs were not significantly different from those for oral NTX or buprenorphine, and were 49% lower than those for methadone.
Patients with opioid dependence who received medication for this disorder had lower hospital utilization and total costs than patients who did not receive pharmacologic therapy. Patients who received XR-NTX had lower inpatient healthcare utilization at comparable or lower total costs than those receiving oral medications.
评估药物治疗与非药物治疗阿片类药物依赖障碍的医疗费用,以及美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的 4 种药物。
回顾性索赔数据库分析。
从一家大型美国健康计划和 PharMetrics 综合数据库中确定符合条件的阿片类药物依赖成年人。数据包括所有可用医疗保健地点的所有医疗和药房索赔。为了对 13316 名患者进行病例组合调整,使用了基线人口统计学、临床和医疗保健使用变量;这些患者中有一半使用了 FDA 批准的阿片类药物依赖治疗药物。在 FDA 批准之前,对使用纳曲酮缓释剂(NTX-XR)(n=156)治疗的 10513 名患者和当时批准的药物(n=845 名口服纳曲酮(NTX)、n=7596 名丁丙诺啡和 n=1916 名美沙酮)进行了类似比较。分析计算了 6 个月的阿片类药物依赖药物、解毒和康复、阿片类药物相关和非相关住院、门诊服务和总费用的坚持率、利用率和支付索赔。
药物治疗与各种类型的住院治疗减少有关。尽管药物治疗费用较高,但与未接受药物治疗的患者相比,接受阿片类药物依赖药物治疗的患者的总医疗保健费用(包括住院、门诊和药房费用)降低了 29%。接受 XR-NTX 的患者的阿片类药物相关和非阿片类药物相关住院治疗次数少于接受口服药物的患者。尽管 XR-NTX 的成本较高,但总医疗保健成本与口服 NTX 或丁丙诺啡没有显著差异,比美沙酮低 49%。
患有阿片类药物依赖的患者接受这种疾病的药物治疗比未接受药物治疗的患者住院利用率和总费用更低。接受 XR-NTX 的患者的住院医疗利用率较低,总医疗保健成本与接受口服药物的患者相当或更低。