Virginia Institute of Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Medical College of Virginia/Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0126, USA.
Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Feb 1;71(3):247-53. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.05.019. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
Many assessment instruments for psychopathy are multidimensional, suggesting that distinguishable factors are needed to effectively capture variation in this personality domain. However, no prior study has examined the factor structure of the DSM-IV criteria for antisocial personality disorder (ASPD).
Self-report questionnaire items reflecting all A criteria for DSM-IV ASPD were available from 4291 twins (including both members of 1647 pairs) from the Virginia Adult Study of Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders. Exploratory factor analysis and twin model fitting were performed using, respectively, Mplus and Mx.
Phenotypic factor analysis produced evidence for two correlated factors: aggressive-disregard and disinhibition. The best-fitting multivariate twin model included two genetic and one unique environmental common factor, along with criteria-specific genetic and environmental effects. The two genetic factors closely resembled the phenotypic factors and varied in their prediction of a range of relevant criterion variables. Scores on the genetic aggressive-disregard factor score were more strongly associated with risk for conduct disorder, early and heavy alcohol use, and low educational status, whereas scores on the genetic disinhibition factor score were more strongly associated with younger age, novelty seeking, and major depression.
From a genetic perspective, the DSM-IV criteria for ASPD do not reflect a single dimension of liability but rather are influenced by two dimensions of genetic risk reflecting aggressive-disregard and disinhibition. The phenotypic structure of the ASPD criteria results largely from genetic and not from environmental influences.
许多用于评估精神变态的评估工具都是多维的,这表明需要有可区分的因素来有效地捕捉这个人格领域的变化。然而,先前没有研究检验过 DSM-IV 反社会人格障碍(ASPD)标准的因素结构。
来自弗吉尼亚州成人精神和物质使用障碍研究的 4291 对双胞胎(包括 1647 对双胞胎的成员)提供了反映 DSM-IV ASPD 所有 A 标准的自我报告问卷项目。使用 Mplus 和 Mx 分别进行探索性因素分析和双胞胎模型拟合。
表型因素分析为两个相关因素提供了证据:攻击忽视和抑制解除。最佳拟合的多变量双胞胎模型包括两个遗传和一个共同的环境因素,以及特定于标准的遗传和环境效应。这两个遗传因素与表型因素非常相似,并且在预测一系列相关标准变量方面存在差异。遗传攻击忽视因素评分与品行障碍、早期和大量饮酒以及教育程度低的风险相关性更强,而遗传抑制解除因素评分与年龄较小、寻求新奇和重度抑郁的相关性更强。
从遗传角度来看,DSM-IV 反社会人格障碍标准并不反映单一的易感性维度,而是受到反映攻击忽视和抑制解除的两个遗传风险维度的影响。ASPD 标准的表型结构主要来自遗传而不是环境影响。