Welander-Vatn A, Ystrom E, Tambs K, Neale M C, Kendler K S, Reichborn-Kjennerud T, Knudsen G P
Department of Genetics, Environment and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 4404 Nydalen, N-0403 Oslo, Norway.
Department of Genetics, Environment and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 4404 Nydalen, N-0403 Oslo, Norway; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:349-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.038. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
There is substantial comorbidity between personality disorders (PDs) and anxiety disorders (ADs). Sharing of familial risk factors possibly explains the co-occurrence, but direct causal relationships between the disorders may also exist.
2801 persons from 1391 twin pairs from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health Twin Panel were assessed for all DSM-IV PDs and ADs. Bivariate Poisson-regression analyses were performed to assess whether PDs predicted ADs at three different levels: All PDs combined, PDs combined within DSM-IV-clusters and each individual PD separately. Next, bivariate co-twin control analyses were executed within monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs. A similar analytic strategy was employed in multivariate models including PDs as independent variables.
PDs predicted ADs at all levels of analysis in bivariate regression models. Bivariate co-twin control analyses demonstrated an increased risk of ADs in all PDs combined, all PD-clusters and in schizotypal, paranoid, borderline, antisocial, avoidant and dependent PD. In the multivariate regression model, all PD-clusters and schizotypal, borderline, avoidant and obsessive-compulsive PD predicted ADs. Only borderline and avoidant PD predicted ADs in the multivariate co-twin control analysis.
Over-adjustment may explain the results from the multivariate analyses. The cross-sectional study design hampers causal inference.
Comorbidity between ADs and PDs can be largely accounted for by shared familial risk factors. However, the results are also consistent with a direct causal relationship partly explaining the co-occurrence. Our results indicate specific environmental factors for comorbidity of ADs and borderline and avoidant PDs that are not shared with other PDs.
人格障碍(PDs)与焦虑症(ADs)之间存在大量共病现象。家族风险因素的共享可能解释了两者的共现情况,但这两种疾病之间也可能存在直接因果关系。
对挪威公共卫生研究所双胞胎小组的1391对双胞胎中的2801人进行了所有DSM-IV人格障碍和焦虑症的评估。进行双变量泊松回归分析,以评估人格障碍在三个不同层面是否能预测焦虑症:所有人格障碍合并考虑、在DSM-IV分类内合并的人格障碍以及分别考虑每种个体人格障碍。接下来,在同卵(MZ)和异卵(DZ)双胞胎对中进行双变量共双胞胎对照分析。在包括人格障碍作为自变量的多变量模型中采用了类似的分析策略。
在双变量回归模型的所有分析层面上,人格障碍都能预测焦虑症。双变量共双胞胎对照分析表明,所有合并的人格障碍、所有人格障碍分类以及分裂型、偏执型、边缘型、反社会型、回避型和依赖型人格障碍中,焦虑症的风险都有所增加。在多变量回归模型中,所有人格障碍分类以及分裂型、边缘型、回避型和强迫型人格障碍能预测焦虑症。在多变量共双胞胎对照分析中,只有边缘型和回避型人格障碍能预测焦虑症。
过度调整可能解释了多变量分析的结果。横断面研究设计妨碍了因果推断。
焦虑症和人格障碍之间的共病现象在很大程度上可由共享的家族风险因素来解释。然而,结果也与部分解释共现情况的直接因果关系相一致。我们的结果表明,焦虑症与边缘型和回避型人格障碍共病存在特定的环境因素,这些因素与其他人格障碍并不共享。