Royal Institute of Technology/Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Department of Philosophy and the History of Technology, Teknikringen 78B, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
Environ Pollut. 2011 Oct;159(10):2487-92. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.06.023. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
Ecotoxicity data with high reliability and relevance are needed to guarantee the scientific quality of environmental risk assessments of pharmaceuticals. The main advantages of a more structured approach to data evaluation include increased transparency and predictability of the risk assessment process, and the possibility to use non-standard data. In this collaboration, between the research project MistraPharma and the German Federal Environment Agency, a new set of reporting and evaluation criteria is presented and discussed. The new criteria are based on the approaches in the literature and the OECD reporting requirements, and have been further developed to include both reliability and relevance of test data. Intended users are risk assessors and researchers performing ecotoxicological experiments, but the criteria can also be used for education purposes and in the peer-review process for scientific papers. This approach intends to bridge the gap between the regulator and the scientist's needs and way of work.
需要具有高可靠性和相关性的毒理学数据,以保证药品环境风险评估的科学质量。数据评估更具结构性方法的主要优点包括:风险评估过程的透明度和可预测性提高,以及使用非标准数据的可能性。在 MistraPharma 研究项目与德国联邦环境署的这次合作中,提出并讨论了一组新的报告和评估标准。新标准基于文献中的方法和经合组织的报告要求,并进一步开发,以包括测试数据的可靠性和相关性。预期的使用者是进行生态毒理学实验的风险评估人员和研究人员,但这些标准也可用于教育目的和科学论文的同行评审过程。这种方法旨在弥合监管机构和科学家的需求和工作方式之间的差距。