• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

表观遗传学在不良结局途径和环境风险评估中的应用。

Epigenetic Applications in Adverse Outcome Pathways and Environmental Risk Evaluation.

机构信息

National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development (ORD), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.

University of California Los Angeles Institute for Society and Genetics, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Apr 12;126(4):045001. doi: 10.1289/EHP2322.

DOI:10.1289/EHP2322
PMID:29669403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6071815/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The epigenome may be an important interface between environmental chemical exposures and human health. However, the links between epigenetic modifications and health outcomes are often correlative and do not distinguish between cause and effect or common-cause relationships. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework has the potential to demonstrate, by way of an inference- and science-based analysis, the causal relationship between chemical exposures, epigenome, and adverse health outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this work is to discuss the epigenome as a modifier of exposure effects and risk, perspectives for integrating toxicoepigenetic data into an AOP framework, tools for the exploration of epigenetic toxicity, and integration of AOP-guided epigenetic information into science and risk-assessment processes.

DISCUSSION

Organizing epigenetic information into the topology of a qualitative AOP network may help describe how a system will respond to epigenetic modifications caused by environmental chemical exposures. However, understanding the biological plausibility, linking epigenetic effects to short- and long-term health outcomes, and including epigenetic studies in the risk assessment process is met by substantive challenges. These obstacles include understanding the complex range of epigenetic modifications and their combinatorial effects, the large number of environmental chemicals to be tested, and the lack of data that quantitatively evaluate the epigenetic effects of environmental exposure.

CONCLUSION

We anticipate that epigenetic information organized into AOP frameworks can be consistently used to support biological plausibility and to identify data gaps that will accelerate the pace at which epigenetic information is applied in chemical evaluation and risk-assessment paradigms. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2322.

摘要

背景

表观基因组可能是环境化学暴露与人类健康之间的重要接口。然而,表观遗传修饰与健康结果之间的联系通常是相关的,无法区分因果关系或共同原因关系。通过推理和基于科学的分析,不良结局途径 (AOP) 框架有可能证明化学暴露、表观基因组和不良健康结果之间的因果关系。

目的

本工作旨在讨论表观基因组作为暴露效应和风险的修饰物,将毒代遗传学数据纳入 AOP 框架的观点,探索表观遗传毒性的工具,以及将 AOP 指导的表观遗传信息整合到科学和风险评估过程中。

讨论

将表观遗传信息组织到定性 AOP 网络的拓扑结构中,可能有助于描述系统将如何对环境化学暴露引起的表观遗传修饰做出反应。然而,理解生物学合理性、将表观遗传效应与短期和长期健康结果联系起来,以及将表观遗传研究纳入风险评估过程,都面临实质性的挑战。这些障碍包括理解复杂的表观遗传修饰范围及其组合效应、要测试的大量环境化学物质,以及缺乏定量评估环境暴露的表观遗传效应的数据。

结论

我们预计,组织到 AOP 框架中的表观遗传信息可以一致地用于支持生物学合理性,并确定数据差距,这将加速将表观遗传信息应用于化学评估和风险评估范式的速度。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2322.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/270f/6071815/879457da6019/EHP2322_f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/270f/6071815/622480a6bfd7/EHP2322_f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/270f/6071815/879457da6019/EHP2322_f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/270f/6071815/622480a6bfd7/EHP2322_f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/270f/6071815/879457da6019/EHP2322_f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Epigenetic Applications in Adverse Outcome Pathways and Environmental Risk Evaluation.表观遗传学在不良结局途径和环境风险评估中的应用。
Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Apr 12;126(4):045001. doi: 10.1289/EHP2322.
2
Development and application of the adverse outcome pathway framework for understanding and predicting chronic toxicity: I. Challenges and research needs in ecotoxicology.用于理解和预测慢性毒性的不良结局途径框架的开发与应用:I. 生态毒理学中的挑战与研究需求
Chemosphere. 2015 Feb;120:764-77. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.068. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
3
The Promises and Challenges of Toxico-Epigenomics: Environmental Chemicals and Their Impacts on the Epigenome.毒理 - 表观基因组学的前景与挑战:环境化学物质及其对表观基因组的影响。
Environ Health Perspect. 2020 Jan;128(1):15001. doi: 10.1289/EHP6104. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
4
Organizing mechanism-related information on chemical interactions using a framework based on the aggregate exposure and adverse outcome pathways.利用基于综合暴露和不良结局途径的框架组织与化学相互作用相关的机制信息。
Environ Int. 2020 May;138:105673. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105673. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
5
Integrative Data Mining Approach: Case Study with Adverse Outcome Pathway Network Leading to Pulmonary Fibrosis.综合数据挖掘方法:以导致肺纤维化的不良结局途径网络为例的研究
Chem Res Toxicol. 2023 Jun 19;36(6):838-847. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00325. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
6
The integration of the adverse outcome pathway framework to radiation risk assessment.将不良结局途径框架整合到辐射风险评估中。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2021;97(1):60-67. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2020.1761570. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
Adverse outcome pathway: a path toward better data consolidation and global co-ordination of radiation research.不良结局途径:一种更好地整合数据和协调全球辐射研究的途径。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2022;98(12):1694-1703. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2021.2020363. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
8
Characterising the epigenome as a key component of the fetal exposome in evaluating in utero exposures and childhood cancer risk.在评估子宫内暴露与儿童癌症风险时,将表观基因组表征为胎儿暴露组的关键组成部分。
Mutagenesis. 2015 Nov;30(6):733-42. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gev010. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
9
Leveraging integrative toxicogenomic approach towards development of stressor-centric adverse outcome pathway networks for plastic additives.利用整合毒理基因组学方法,开发以压力源为中心的塑料添加剂不良结局途径网络。
Arch Toxicol. 2024 Oct;98(10):3299-3321. doi: 10.1007/s00204-024-03825-z. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
10
AOPERA: A proposed methodology and inventory of effective tools to link chemicals to adverse outcome pathways.AOPERA:一种将化学品与不良结局途径联系起来的建议方法和有效工具清单。
ALTEX. 2020;37(1):64-74. doi: 10.14573/altex.1906201. Epub 2019 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Role and mechanism of IGFBP5 in the real-ambient particulate matter exposure-induced chronic lung injury.胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白5在实际环境颗粒物暴露诱导的慢性肺损伤中的作用及机制
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 25;16:1604301. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1604301. eCollection 2025.
2
Glyphosate and a glyphosate-based herbicide dysregulate the epigenetic landscape of Homeobox A10 () gene during the endometrial receptivity in rats.草甘膦和一种基于草甘膦的除草剂在大鼠子宫内膜容受性期间会破坏同源盒A10()基因的表观遗传格局。
Front Toxicol. 2024 Sep 13;6:1438826. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2024.1438826. eCollection 2024.
3
Peasant family farming as an alternative to industrial agriculture: Implications for maternal and child health in Paraguay.

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse outcome pathway networks II: Network analytics.不良结局途径网络 II:网络分析。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018 Jun;37(6):1734-1748. doi: 10.1002/etc.4124. Epub 2018 May 7.
2
Adverse outcome pathway networks I: Development and applications.不良结局路径网络 I:开发与应用。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018 Jun;37(6):1723-1733. doi: 10.1002/etc.4125. Epub 2018 May 7.
3
Adverse outcome pathways: a concise introduction for toxicologists.不良结局途径:毒理学家简明指南。
农民家庭农业作为工业化农业的替代方案:对巴拉圭母婴健康的影响
Front Epidemiol. 2022 Nov 29;2:954081. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2022.954081. eCollection 2022.
4
Expanding adverse outcome pathways towards one health models for nanosafety.拓展纳米安全性的不良结局途径,迈向“同一健康”模式
Front Toxicol. 2023 Aug 25;5:1176745. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2023.1176745. eCollection 2023.
5
Transcriptional Alterations Induced by Delta-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol in the Brain and Gonads of Adult Medaka.Δ9-四氢大麻酚对成年青鳉鱼脑和性腺的转录影响
J Xenobiot. 2023 May 30;13(2):237-251. doi: 10.3390/jox13020018.
6
Application of AOPs to assist regulatory assessment of chemical risks - Case studies, needs and recommendations.应用 AOP 辅助化学风险监管评估——案例研究、需求与建议。
Environ Res. 2023 Jan 15;217:114650. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114650. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
7
Toxicoepigenetics for Risk Assessment: Bridging the Gap Between Basic and Regulatory Science.用于风险评估的毒理表观遗传学:弥合基础科学与监管科学之间的差距
Epigenet Insights. 2022 Jul 15;15:25168657221113149. doi: 10.1177/25168657221113149. eCollection 2022.
8
Genome-wide alteration of histone methylation profiles associated with cognitive changes in response to developmental arsenic exposure in mice.全基因组组蛋白甲基化谱的改变与小鼠发育过程中砷暴露引起的认知变化相关。
Toxicol Rep. 2022 Mar 4;9:393-403. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2022.03.008. eCollection 2022.
9
Integration of Epigenetic Mechanisms into Non-Genotoxic Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Focus on DNA Methylation and Histone Modifications.将表观遗传机制纳入非遗传毒性致癌性危害评估中:重点关注 DNA 甲基化和组蛋白修饰。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Oct 11;22(20):10969. doi: 10.3390/ijms222010969.
10
HeLa TI cell-based assay as a new approach to screen for chemicals able to reactivate the expression of epigenetically silenced genes.基于 HeLa TI 细胞的检测方法作为一种新的手段,用于筛选能够重新激活表观遗传沉默基因表达的化学物质。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 11;16(6):e0252504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252504. eCollection 2021.
Arch Toxicol. 2017 Nov;91(11):3697-3707. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-2020-z. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
4
Environmental toxicants, incidence of degenerative diseases, and therapies from the epigenetic point of view.从表观遗传学角度看环境毒物、退行性疾病的发病率及治疗方法。
Arch Toxicol. 2017 Jul;91(7):2577-2597. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-1979-9. Epub 2017 May 17.
5
Functional variation in allelic methylomes underscores a strong genetic contribution and reveals novel epigenetic alterations in the human epigenome.等位基因甲基化组中的功能变异突显了强大的遗传贡献,并揭示了人类表观基因组中新型的表观遗传改变。
Genome Biol. 2017 Mar 10;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1173-7.
6
Circular RNAs: An emerging type of RNA in cancer.环状RNA:癌症中一种新兴的RNA类型。
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2017 Mar;30(1):1-6. doi: 10.1177/0394632016686985. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
7
Linking the Epigenome with Exposure Effects and Susceptibility: The Epigenetic Seed and Soil Model.将表观基因组与暴露效应和易感性联系起来:表观遗传的种子与土壤模型。
Toxicol Sci. 2017 Feb;155(2):302-314. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfw215. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
8
The International Human Epigenome Consortium: A Blueprint for Scientific Collaboration and Discovery.国际人类表观基因组联盟:科学合作与发现的蓝图。
Cell. 2016 Nov 17;167(5):1145-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.007.
9
DNA demethylation pathways: Additional players and regulators.DNA去甲基化途径:其他参与者和调节因子。
Bioessays. 2017 Jan;39(1):1-13. doi: 10.1002/bies.201600178. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
10
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.