Suppr超能文献

全局流基于局部运动线索影响通过时间判断。

Global flow impacts time-to-passage judgments based on local motion cues.

作者信息

Beardsley Scott A, Sikoglu Elif M, Hecht Heiko, Vaina Lucia M

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, P.O. Box 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2011 Aug 15;51(16):1880-7. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Jul 8.

Abstract

We assessed the effect of the coherence of optic flow on time-to-passage judgments in order to investigate the strategies that observers use when local expansion information is reduced or lacking. In the standard display, we presented a cloud of dots whose image expanded consistent with constant observer motion. The dots themselves, however, did not expand and were thus devoid of object expansion cues. Only the separations between the dots expanded. Subjects had to judge which of two colored target dots, presented at different simulated depths and lateral displacements would pass them first. Image velocities of the target dots were chosen so as to correlate with time-to-passage only some of the time. When optic flow was mainly incoherent, subjects' responses were biased and relied on image velocities rather than on global flow analysis. However, the bias induced by misleading image velocity cues diminished as a function of the coherence of the optic flow. We discuss the results in the context of a global tau mechanism and settle a debate whether local expansion cues or optic flow analysis are the basis for time-to-passage estimation.

摘要

我们评估了光流连贯性对通过时间判断的影响,以研究观察者在局部扩展信息减少或缺乏时所使用的策略。在标准显示中,我们呈现了一团点,其图像随着观察者的匀速运动而一致地扩展。然而,这些点本身并没有扩展,因此没有物体扩展线索。只有点之间的间距在扩展。受试者必须判断在不同模拟深度和横向位移处呈现的两个彩色目标点中哪一个会先经过他们。目标点的图像速度被选择为仅在某些时候与通过时间相关。当光流主要不连贯时,受试者的反应存在偏差,并依赖于图像速度而非全局流分析。然而,由误导性图像速度线索引起的偏差随着光流连贯性的增加而减小。我们在全局tau机制的背景下讨论了结果,并解决了关于局部扩展线索或光流分析是否是通过时间估计基础的争论。

相似文献

1
Global flow impacts time-to-passage judgments based on local motion cues.全局流基于局部运动线索影响通过时间判断。
Vision Res. 2011 Aug 15;51(16):1880-7. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
8
Can Stroboscopic Training Improve Judgments of Time-to-Collision?频闪训练能否提高碰撞时间判断?
Hum Factors. 2020 Feb;62(1):152-165. doi: 10.1177/0018720819841938. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating time-to-contact when vision is impaired.估计视力受损时的接触时间。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 27;11(1):21213. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00331-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Integration mechanisms for heading perception.航向感知的整合机制。
Seeing Perceiving. 2010;23(3):197-221. doi: 10.1163/187847510X503605. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
2
Different strategies for using motion-in-depth information in catching.在捕捉过程中使用深度运动信息的不同策略。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):1004-22. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.1004.
5
6
Visually guided collision avoidance and collision achievement.视觉引导的避碰与碰撞达成。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Mar;4(3):99-107. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01442-4.
10
Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact.接触时间感知中的实证与理论问题。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 Aug;17(3):865-76. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.3.865.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验