Vascular and Cardiac Surgery, Hôpital Cardiologique, CHU LILLE, INSERM U1008, Université Lille Nord, France.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Oct;42(4):442-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.04.037. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
Open graft replacement of the ascending aorta is the current treatment of choice for Stanford acute type A dissections. However, approximately 20% of patients are deemed unfit for open surgery. To determine if an endovascular option exists for this latter group of patients, we performed a computed tomography (CT)-based feasibility study.
A cohort of consecutive patients presenting to the cardiovascular care unit (CVCU) for an acute Stanford type A aortic dissection between 2006 and 2009 was retrospectively analysed. Inclusion criterion was a high-quality preoperative angio-CT scan that could be analysed on a three-dimensional (3D) workstation. Numerous anatomical parameters of the dissection were studied, including the location and the length of the primary proximal entry tear. Finally, we determined which of the patients would have been potential candidates for an endovascular repair (stentgraft implantation).
A total of 102 patients were included in our study. The median distance of the primary entry tear to the closest coronary artery was 23 mm (range 0-128). The median true lumen and true + false lumen (total) diameters at the level of the entry tear was 38 mm (range 22-78) and 46 mm (range 28-93), respectively. The median length of the ascending aorta was 84 mm (range 40-130). An endovascular repair with a tubular stentgraft was deemed feasible in 37 patients. An additional eight patients were also candidates for a tubular endovascular repair but would have required a carotidecarotid cross over bypass. Finally, an arch-branched stentgraft could have been used in 13 patients to exclude an entry tear located in the arch.
Open repair of acute type A dissection is and remains the 'gold standard' of care. Our study demonstrates that approximately half the patients undergoing an open repair could potentially benefit from an endovascular repair. This new treatment option has not been evaluated to date.
开放式升主动脉移植置换术是当前治疗斯坦福急性 A 型主动脉夹层的首选方法。然而,大约 20%的患者不适合开放手术。为了确定对于这组患者是否存在血管内治疗选择,我们进行了一项基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的可行性研究。
回顾性分析了 2006 年至 2009 年期间心血管护理病房(CVCU)收治的急性 Stanford A 型主动脉夹层连续患者队列。纳入标准为术前高质量的血管 CT 扫描,可在三维(3D)工作站上进行分析。研究了夹层的许多解剖学参数,包括原发性近端入口撕裂的位置和长度。最后,我们确定了哪些患者可能是血管内修复(支架植入)的潜在候选者。
共有 102 例患者纳入本研究。原发性入口撕裂至最近冠状动脉的中位数距离为 23mm(范围 0-128)。入口撕裂处真腔和真+假腔(总)直径的中位数分别为 38mm(范围 22-78)和 46mm(范围 28-93)。升主动脉的中位数长度为 84mm(范围 40-130)。37 例患者的管状支架移植被认为可行。另外 8 例患者也适合管状血管内修复,但需要颈动脉-颈动脉交叉旁路。最后,13 例患者可使用分支型支架移植物排除位于弓部的入口撕裂。
开放式修复急性 A 型夹层是且仍然是“金标准”治疗方法。我们的研究表明,大约一半接受开放式修复的患者可能受益于血管内修复。这种新的治疗选择尚未得到评估。