Kai Katsunori
Waseda University, Tokyo.
J Int Bioethique. 2010 Dec;21(4):135-47, 166. doi: 10.3917/jib.214.0135.
In Japan, there are no acts and, specific provisions or official guidelines on euthanasia, but recently, as I will mention below, an official guideline on "death with dignity" has been made. Nevertheless in fact, this guideline provides only a few rules of process on terminal care. Therefore the problems of euthanasia and "death with dignity" are mainly left to the legal interpretation by literatures and judicial precedents of homicide (Article 199 of the Criminal Code; where there is no distinction between murder and manslaughter) and of homicide with consent (Article 202 of the Criminal Code). Furthermore, there are several cases on euthanasia or "death with dignity" as well as borderline cases in Japan. In this paper I will present the situation of the latest discussions on euthanasia and "death with dignity" in Japan from the viewpoint of medical law. Especially, "death with dignity" is seriously discussed in Japan, therefore I focus on it.
在日本,没有关于安乐死的法案、具体规定或官方指导方针,但最近,正如我将在下文提及的,已经制定了一项关于“尊严死”的官方指导方针。然而事实上,该指导方针仅提供了一些临终关怀的程序规则。因此,安乐死和“尊严死”的问题主要留待依据关于杀人罪(《刑法》第199条;谋杀和过失杀人无区别)和经同意的杀人罪(《刑法》第202条)的文献及司法判例进行法律解释。此外,在日本有几起关于安乐死或“尊严死”的案例以及边缘案例。在本文中,我将从医疗法的角度介绍日本关于安乐死和“尊严死”的最新讨论情况。特别是,“尊严死”在日本受到了严肃讨论,因此我将重点关注它。