• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

广义多态概念解释抽象范畴中的渐变结构。

The generalized polymorphous concept account of graded structure in abstract categories.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2011 Aug;39(6):1117-32. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0083-2.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-011-0083-2
PMID:21472478
Abstract

Abstract categories present with graded structure. The extent to which feature commonality between exemplars and category provides a satisfying account of this graded structure varies from one abstract category to the other (Hampton, 1981). We investigate whether the incorporation of features that exemplars share with external categories yields an improved account of abstract categories' graded structures. In doing so, we follow the suggestion that abstract categories are relational in nature (Goldstone, 1996; Wiemer-Hastings & Xu, 2005). The generalized polymorphous concept model, which incorporates both types of features, is found to improve the account of typicality and category membership in three of seven studied abstract categories. These three categories are found to be the most abstract, suggesting that it is appropriate to think of abstract categories as varying along a continuum of abstractness/interrelatedness rather than as a distinct type of category altogether.

摘要

抽象类别呈现出等级结构。范例与类别之间的特征共性在多大程度上为这种等级结构提供了令人满意的解释,因抽象类别而异(Hampton,1981)。我们调查了是否将范例与外部类别共享的特征纳入其中,是否可以对抽象类别的等级结构做出更好的解释。在这样做的过程中,我们遵循了抽象类别本质上是关系性的观点(Goldstone,1996;Wiemer-Hastings 和 Xu,2005)。事实证明,包含这两种特征的广义多态概念模型可以改善对七个研究的抽象类别中三个类别的典型性和类别成员身份的解释。这三个类别被认为是最抽象的,这表明将抽象类别视为沿着抽象性/相关性的连续体变化而不是作为一种完全不同类型的类别是合适的。

相似文献

1
The generalized polymorphous concept account of graded structure in abstract categories.广义多态概念解释抽象范畴中的渐变结构。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Aug;39(6):1117-32. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0083-2.
2
Features of graded category structure: Generalizing the family resemblance and polymorphous concept models.分级类别结构的特征:推广家族相似性和多态概念模型。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Mar;133(3):244-55. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.005. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
3
Contrast effects in typicality judgements: a hierarchical Bayesian approach.典型性判断中的对比效应:一种分层贝叶斯方法。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(9):1721-39. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.662237. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
4
Combining graded categories: membership and typicality.结合分级类别:隶属度与典型性。
Psychol Rev. 1994 Jan;101(1):157-65. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.101.1.157.
5
A probabilistic account of exemplar and category generation.范例和类别生成的概率解释。
Cogn Psychol. 2013 Feb;66(1):85-125. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
6
Representation at different levels in a conceptual hierarchy.概念层次结构中不同层级的表示。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 May 28.
7
Monitoring of learning at the category level when learning a natural concept: will task experience improve its resolution?学习自然概念时类别层面学习的监测:任务经验会提高其分辨率吗?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Feb;155:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.011. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
8
Essentialism and graded membership in animal and artifact categories.动物和人工制品类别的本质主义与等级成员关系。
Mem Cognit. 1995 May;23(3):335-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03197235.
9
Comparison of verbal typicality judgments of mentally retarded and nonretarded persons.智障者与非智障者言语典型性判断的比较。
Am J Ment Defic. 1985 Nov;90(3):335-41.
10
Abstract coherent categories.抽象相干范畴。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Sep;27(5):1261-75. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1261.

引用本文的文献

1
The distributional properties of exemplars affect category learning and generalization.范例的分布特性会影响类别学习和泛化。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 28;11(1):11263. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90743-0.
2
What Directions Do We Look at Power from? Up-Down, Left-Right, and Front-Back.
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 10;10(7):e0132756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132756. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceived frequency of concrete and abstract words.具体词和抽象词的感知频率。
Mem Cognit. 1973 Mar;1(1):56-60. doi: 10.3758/BF03198068.
2
Uncovering contrast categories in categorization with a probabilistic threshold model.用概率阈模型揭示分类中的对比类别。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Nov;37(6):1515-31. doi: 10.1037/a0024431. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
3
Content differences for abstract and concrete concepts.具体概念和抽象概念的内容差异。
Cogn Sci. 2005 Sep 10;29(5):719-36. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_33.
4
Semantic diversity accounts for the "missing" word frequency effect in stroke aphasia: insights using a novel method to quantify contextual variability in meaning.语义多样性解释了中风失语症中“缺失”单词频率效应:使用一种新方法量化意义的上下文可变性的见解。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2432-46. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21614. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
5
Features of graded category structure: Generalizing the family resemblance and polymorphous concept models.分级类别结构的特征:推广家族相似性和多态概念模型。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Mar;133(3):244-55. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.005. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
6
Exemplar by feature applicability matrices and other Dutch normative data for semantic concepts.通过特征适用性矩阵和其他荷兰语语义概念规范数据的示例。
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Nov;40(4):1030-48. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1030.
7
Comparing dependent correlations.比较相关依存关系。
J Gen Psychol. 2008 Jan;135(1):105-12. doi: 10.3200/GENP.135.1.105-112.
8
Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering.多维标度、树拟合和聚类。
Science. 1980 Oct 24;210(4468):390-8. doi: 10.1126/science.210.4468.390.
9
Confidence and gradedness in semantic categorization: definitely somewhat artifactual, maybe absolutely natural.语义分类中的置信度和分级性:肯定在某种程度上是人为的,也许完全是自然的。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Dec;11(6):1041-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03196734.
10
Common and distinctive features in stimulus similarity: a modified version of the contrast model.刺激相似性中的共同特征与独特特征:对比模型的修正版
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Dec;11(6):961-74. doi: 10.3758/bf03196728.