Bonneux Luc
Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI), Den Haag, the Netherlands.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(26):A3533.
The practice guideline 'The Prevention Visit' by the Dutch College of General Practitioners utilises a questionnaire and derived risk score related to age, sex, BMI, smoking status and a few more but minor determinants to assess the absolute risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and chronic kidney disease. According to this test, all persons over 65 are at risk. The description of the health problem addressed is limited to unfounded speculations on unhealthy lifestyles. Except for smoking cessation and blood pressure reduction, the proposed interventions lack evidence of effectiveness. The undesirable or harmful side effects of advice and treatments, particularly the overtreatment of elderly persons, are not discussed. This prevention visit is therefore an emanation of the culture of fear: health experts exaggerating health problems. In doing so, they transform the basic human fear of ageing and death into seemingly objective 'risks' that need 'treatments'.
荷兰全科医生学院的实践指南《预防就诊》使用了一份问卷以及与年龄、性别、体重指数、吸烟状况和其他一些次要决定因素相关的推导风险评分,以评估心血管疾病、糖尿病和慢性肾病的绝对风险。根据这项测试,所有65岁以上的人都有风险。所提及的健康问题描述仅限于对不健康生活方式的无端猜测。除了戒烟和降低血压外,所提议的干预措施缺乏有效性证据。未讨论建议和治疗的不良或有害副作用,尤其是对老年人的过度治疗。因此,这次预防就诊是恐惧文化的一种表现:健康专家夸大健康问题。这样一来,他们将人类对衰老和死亡的基本恐惧转化为看似客观的需要“治疗”的“风险”。