• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过唤起自我来激发选民投票率。

Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 2;108(31):12653-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103343108. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1103343108
PMID:21768362
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3150938/
Abstract

Three randomized experiments found that subtle linguistic cues have the power to increase voting and related behavior. The phrasing of survey items was varied to frame voting either as the enactment of a personal identity (e.g., "being a voter") or as simply a behavior (e.g., "voting"). As predicted, the personal-identity phrasing significantly increased interest in registering to vote (experiment 1) and, in two statewide elections in the United States, voter turnout as assessed by official state records (experiments 2 and 3). These results provide evidence that people are continually managing their self-concepts, seeking to assume or affirm valued personal identities. The results further demonstrate how this process can be channeled to motivate important socially relevant behavior.

摘要

三项随机实验发现,微妙的语言提示具有增强投票和相关行为的力量。通过改变调查项目的措辞,将投票框定为个人身份的体现(例如,“作为选民”)或仅仅是一种行为(例如,“投票”)。正如所预测的那样,个人身份的措辞显著增加了人们对注册投票的兴趣(实验 1),并且在美国的两次全州选举中,官方州记录评估的投票率(实验 2 和 3)也有所提高。这些结果提供了证据,证明人们一直在管理自己的自我概念,寻求承担或肯定有价值的个人身份。结果进一步表明,如何通过这个过程来激励重要的社会相关行为。

相似文献

1
Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self.通过唤起自我来激发选民投票率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 2;108(31):12653-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103343108. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
2
A field experiment shows that subtle linguistic cues might not affect voter behavior.一项实地实验表明,微妙的语言线索可能不会影响选民行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jun 28;113(26):7112-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1513727113. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
3
Increasing Voter Participation Through Health Care-Based Voter Registration.通过医疗保健为选民登记提高选民参与度。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241563. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1563.
4
Changes and continuities in the determinants of older adults' voter turnout 1952-1996.1952年至1996年美国老年人投票率决定因素的变化与延续性
Gerontologist. 2001 Dec;41(6):805-18. doi: 10.1093/geront/41.6.805.
5
A National Voter Registration Campaign.全国选民登记运动。
Pediatrics. 2023 Aug 1;152(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-059501.
6
Do you have a voting plan?: implementation intentions, voter turnout, and organic plan making.你有投票计划吗?:实施意图、投票率和有机计划制定。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Feb;21(2):194-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797609359326. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
7
Americans discount the effect of friction on voter turnout.美国人低估了摩擦对投票率的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 23;119(34):e2206072119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206072119. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
8
A sociocultural approach to voting: Construing voting as a duty to others predicts political interest and engagement.一种关于投票的社会文化方法:将投票视为对他人的责任,可以预测政治兴趣和参与度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 28;121(22):e2215051121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2215051121. Epub 2024 May 20.
9
400 million voting records show profound racial and geographic disparities in voter turnout in the United States.4 亿张选票记录显示,美国选民投票率存在深刻的种族和地域差异。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 8;17(6):e0268134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268134. eCollection 2022.
10
A polygenic score for educational attainment partially predicts voter turnout.一个用于教育成就的多基因分数部分预测了选民投票率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 14;118(50). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2022715118.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived social contribution and its associations with political participation.感知到的社会贡献及其与政治参与的关联。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 5;20(9):e0330385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330385. eCollection 2025.
2
Defusing political animosity in the United States with a cooperative online quiz game.通过一款合作在线问答游戏化解美国的政治敌意。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02225-2.
3
Motivating Proactive Biorisk Management.激励主动生物风险管理。
Health Secur. 2023 Jan-Feb;21(1):46-60. doi: 10.1089/hs.2022.0101. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
4
Efficiently exploring the causal role of contextual moderators in behavioral science.高效探索行为科学中情境调节变量的因果作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jan 3;120(1):e2216315120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2216315120. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
5
Development of opioid rapid response system: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.阿片类药物快速反应系统的开发:一项随机对照试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Apr;115:106727. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106727. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
6
Memory for syntactic differences in mental illness descriptions.精神疾病描述中句法差异的记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Feb;50(2):407-424. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01208-8. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
7
Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution.没有异质性革命,行为科学不太可能改变世界。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Aug;5(8):980-989. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01143-3. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
8
A scalable empathic supervision intervention to mitigate recidivism from probation and parole.一种可扩展的共情监督干预措施,以减少缓刑和假释中的累犯。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 6;118(14). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018036118.
9
Nudging Commuters to Increase Public Transport Use: A Field Experiment in Rotterdam.引导通勤者增加公共交通使用率:鹿特丹的一项实地实验。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 11;12:633865. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633865. eCollection 2021.
10
ASIA: Automated Social Identity Assessment using linguistic style.亚洲:使用语言风格的自动化社会认同评估。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1762-1781. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01511-3. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Do you have a voting plan?: implementation intentions, voter turnout, and organic plan making.你有投票计划吗?:实施意图、投票率和有机计划制定。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Feb;21(2):194-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797609359326. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
2
Reducing the racial achievement gap: a social-psychological intervention.缩小种族成就差距:一项社会心理干预措施。
Science. 2006 Sep 1;313(5791):1307-10. doi: 10.1126/science.1128317.
3
Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice.道德信誉与偏见的表达。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Jul;81(1):33-43.
4
Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect.自我差异:一种关于自我与情感的理论。
Psychol Rev. 1987 Jul;94(3):319-40.