• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引导通勤者增加公共交通使用率:鹿特丹的一项实地实验。

Nudging Commuters to Increase Public Transport Use: A Field Experiment in Rotterdam.

作者信息

Franssens Samuel, Botchway Ebo, de Swart Willie, Dewitte Siegfried

机构信息

Rennes School of Business, Rennes, France.

KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 11;12:633865. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633865. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633865
PMID:33776859
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7990888/
Abstract

A large-scale field experiment in Rotterdam, Netherlands, tested whether nudging could increase public transport use. During one work week, 4000 commuters on six bus lines, received a free travel card holder. On the three bus lines in the experimental condition, the card holders displayed a social label that branded bus passengers as sustainable travelers because of their bus use. On the three bus lines in the control condition, there was no such message on the card holders. Analysis of the number of rides per hour showed that the intervention led to a change from pre-intervention (619 days) to post-intervention period (176 days) that was estimated to be 1.18 rides per day greater on experimental lines than on control lines. This experiment shows that public transport operators can increase public transport use by incorporating messages that positively label passengers as sustainable travelers in their communication strategies.

摘要

在荷兰鹿特丹进行的一项大规模实地实验,测试了助推措施是否能增加公共交通的使用率。在一个工作周内,六条公交线路上的4000名通勤者收到了一个免费的公交卡套。在处于实验条件的三条公交线路上,卡套上展示了一个社会标签,将乘坐公交车的乘客标记为可持续出行者,因为他们选择乘坐公交车出行。在处于对照条件的三条公交线路上,卡套上没有这样的信息。对每小时乘车次数的分析表明,干预措施导致从干预前(619天)到干预后期间(176天),实验线路上每天的乘车次数估计比对照线路多1.18次。该实验表明,公共交通运营商可以通过在其沟通策略中纳入积极将乘客标记为可持续出行者的信息,来提高公共交通的使用率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ff/7990888/13176ad4f211/fpsyg-12-633865-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ff/7990888/666e22d37d9a/fpsyg-12-633865-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ff/7990888/13176ad4f211/fpsyg-12-633865-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ff/7990888/666e22d37d9a/fpsyg-12-633865-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ff/7990888/13176ad4f211/fpsyg-12-633865-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Nudging Commuters to Increase Public Transport Use: A Field Experiment in Rotterdam.引导通勤者增加公共交通使用率:鹿特丹的一项实地实验。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 11;12:633865. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633865. eCollection 2021.
2
Particulates and noise exposure during bicycle, bus and car commuting: A study in three European cities.自行车、公交车和汽车通勤过程中的颗粒物与噪声暴露:一项针对欧洲三个城市的研究。
Environ Res. 2017 Apr;154:181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.12.012. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
3
Enhancing service quality of rural public transport during the COVID-19 pandemic: a novel fuzzy approach.提升新冠疫情期间农村公共交通服务质量:一种新颖的模糊方法
Public Transp. 2023;15(2):479-501. doi: 10.1007/s12469-022-00318-z. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
4
Impact of the statutory concessionary travel scheme on bus travel among older people: a natural experiment from England.法定优惠旅行计划对老年人公交出行的影响:来自英格兰的一项自然实验。
Ageing Soc. 2020 Nov;40(11):2480-2494. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X19000692. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
5
Committing to Keep Clean: Nudging Complements Standard Policy Measures to Reduce Illegal Urban Garbage Disposal in a Neighborhood With High Levels of Social Cohesion.致力于保持清洁:在社会凝聚力较高的社区,助推措施补充标准政策措施以减少城市非法垃圾处理
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 27;12:660410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660410. eCollection 2021.
6
Severity of passenger injuries on public buses: A comparative analysis of collision injuries and non-collision injuries.公交车乘客受伤严重程度:碰撞伤与非碰撞伤的比较分析。
J Safety Res. 2020 Sep;74:55-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 May 4.
7
Using simulation model as a tool for analyzing bus service reliability and implementing improvement strategies.利用仿真模型作为分析公交服务可靠性和实施改进策略的工具。
PLoS One. 2020 May 7;15(5):e0232799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232799. eCollection 2020.
8
Estimation of the Number of Passengers in a Bus Using Deep Learning.利用深度学习估算公交车上的乘客数量。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Apr 12;20(8):2178. doi: 10.3390/s20082178.
9
Effects of subsidising bus travel on the occurrence of road traffic casualties.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1987 Mar;41(1):50-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.41.1.50.
10
Cueing healthier alternatives for take-away: a field experiment on the effects of (disclosing) three nudges on food choices.提示更健康的外卖选择:(披露)三种推动因素对食品选择影响的现场实验。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 22;19(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7323-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioral interventions for waste reduction: a systematic review of experimental studies.减少废物产生的行为干预措施:实验研究的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 24;16:1561467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1561467. eCollection 2025.
2
Driving sustainable change: A systematic map of behaviorally informed interventions to promote sustainable mobility behavior.推动可持续变革:促进可持续出行行为的行为洞察干预措施系统图谱
PNAS Nexus. 2025 May 22;4(6):pgaf162. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf162. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Specification curve analysis.规范曲线分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1208-1214. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
2
What we can learn from five naturalistic field experiments that failed to shift commuter behaviour.从五个未能改变通勤者行为的自然主义实地实验中我们可以学到什么。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Feb;4(2):169-176. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0795-z. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
3
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials testing behavioural interventions to promote household action on climate change.随机对照试验的荟萃分析,以测试促进家庭采取行动应对气候变化的行为干预措施。
Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 4;10(1):4545. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12457-2.
4
On the Use of Nudges to Affect Spillovers in Environmental Behaviors.关于利用助推手段影响环境行为中的溢出效应
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 29;10:61. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00061. eCollection 2019.
5
Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self.通过唤起自我来激发选民投票率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 2;108(31):12653-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103343108. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
6
Normative social influence is underdetected.规范性社会影响未被充分察觉。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jul;34(7):913-23. doi: 10.1177/0146167208316691.
7
The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms.社会规范的建构力、破坏力和重建力。
Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):429-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x.