• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用逆概率加权法进行因果推断的敏感性分析。

Sensitivity analysis for causal inference using inverse probability weighting.

作者信息

Shen Changyu, Li Xiaochun, Li Lingling, Were Martin C

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

出版信息

Biom J. 2011 Sep;53(5):822-37. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201100042. Epub 2011 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1002/bimj.201100042
PMID:21770046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3777387/
Abstract

Evaluation of impact of potential uncontrolled confounding is an important component for causal inference based on observational studies. In this article, we introduce a general framework of sensitivity analysis that is based on inverse probability weighting. We propose a general methodology that allows both non-parametric and parametric analyses, which are driven by two parameters that govern the magnitude of the variation of the multiplicative errors of the propensity score and their correlations with the potential outcomes. We also introduce a specific parametric model that offers a mechanistic view on how the uncontrolled confounding may bias the inference through these parameters. Our method can be readily applied to both binary and continuous outcomes and depends on the covariates only through the propensity score that can be estimated by any parametric or non-parametric method. We illustrate our method with two medical data sets.

摘要

评估潜在未控制混杂因素的影响是基于观察性研究进行因果推断的重要组成部分。在本文中,我们介绍了一种基于逆概率加权的敏感性分析通用框架。我们提出了一种通用方法,该方法允许进行非参数和参数分析,这两种分析由两个参数驱动,这两个参数控制倾向得分的乘法误差的变化幅度及其与潜在结果的相关性。我们还引入了一个特定的参数模型,该模型提供了一个机制性观点,说明未控制的混杂因素如何通过这些参数使推断产生偏差。我们的方法可以很容易地应用于二元和连续结果,并且仅通过倾向得分依赖于协变量,而倾向得分可以通过任何参数或非参数方法进行估计。我们用两个医学数据集说明了我们的方法。

相似文献

1
Sensitivity analysis for causal inference using inverse probability weighting.使用逆概率加权法进行因果推断的敏感性分析。
Biom J. 2011 Sep;53(5):822-37. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201100042. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
2
Murmurs from the heart (or why the stethoscope is not an economic tool).心脏杂音(或为何听诊器并非一种经济工具)。
Heart. 1998 Jan;79(1):10-1. doi: 10.1136/hrt.79.1.10.
3
Enthusiasm, reality, and cost-effectiveness analysis.热情、现实与成本效益分析。
Heart. 1998 Jan;79(1):9-10. doi: 10.1136/hrt.79.1.9.
4
Routine use of abciximab in coronary stenting?冠状动脉支架置入术中阿昔单抗的常规应用?
Lancet. 1998 Jul 11;352(9122):81-2. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)85003-4.
5
Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of single bolus treatment with abciximab (Reo Pro) in preventing restenosis following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in high risk patients.阿昔单抗(Reo Pro)单次推注治疗高危患者经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术后预防再狭窄的有效性及成本效益
Heart. 1998 Jan;79(1):12-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.79.1.12.
6
Comparative 30-day economic and clinical outcomes of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use during elective percutaneous coronary intervention: Prairie ReoPro versus Integrilin Cost Evaluation (PRICE) Trial.择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间使用血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂的30天经济和临床结局比较:Prairie ReoPro与Integrilin成本评估(PRICE)试验
Am Heart J. 2001 Mar;141(3):402-9. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.113391.
7
Impact of abciximab versus eptifibatide on length of hospital stay for PCI patients.阿昔单抗与依替巴肽对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者住院时间的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001 Jul;53(3):296-303. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1170.
8
Economics and cost-effectiveness in evaluating the value of cardiovascular therapies. Use of abciximab: comparative economic data.评估心血管治疗价值中的经济学与成本效益。阿昔单抗的应用:比较经济数据。
Am Heart J. 1999 May;137(5):S123-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70445-x.
9
[An economic assessment of the use of abciximab as a coronary angioplasty preparation in the Italian health-care context].[在意大利医疗环境中使用阿昔单抗作为冠状动脉血管成形术制剂的经济评估]
G Ital Cardiol. 1999 Mar;29(3):269-76.
10
Abciximab therapy in percutaneous intervention: economic issues in the United States.
Am Heart J. 1998 Apr;135(4):S90-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70301-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Informative censoring in externally controlled clinical trials: a potential source of bias.外部对照临床试验中的信息删失:偏倚的一个潜在来源。
ESMO Open. 2025 Jan;10(1):104094. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104094. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
2
Sensitivity analysis for causality in observational studies for regulatory science.监管科学观察性研究中因果关系的敏感性分析。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Dec 5;7(1):e267. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.688. eCollection 2023.
3
BOUNDS ON THE CONDITIONAL AND AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECT WITH UNOBSERVED CONFOUNDING FACTORS.存在未观测混杂因素时条件处理效应和平均处理效应的界值
Ann Stat. 2022 Oct;50(5):2587-2615. doi: 10.1214/22-aos2195. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
4
Intravenous edaravone treatment in ALS and survival: An exploratory, retrospective, administrative claims analysis.依达拉奉静脉治疗对肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者生存率的影响:一项探索性、回顾性、基于行政索赔数据的分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Aug 4;52:101590. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101590. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Association of the use of hearing aids with the conversion from mild cognitive impairment to dementia and progression of dementia: A longitudinal retrospective study.助听器使用与从轻度认知障碍转变为痴呆及痴呆进展的关联:一项纵向回顾性研究。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021 Feb 14;7(1):e12122. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12122. eCollection 2021.
6
Rationale and Design of the SAFE-PAD Study.SAFE-PAD 研究的原理和设计。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jan;14(1):e007040. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007040. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
7
Practice of causal inference with the propensity of being zero or one: assessing the effect of arbitrary cutoffs of propensity scores.基于倾向值为零或一的因果推断实践:评估倾向得分任意截断值的效果
Commun Stat Appl Methods. 2016 Jan;23(1):1-20. doi: 10.5351/CSAM.2016.23.1.001. Epub 2016 Jan 31.
8
Statistical sensitivity analysis for the estimation of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders prevalence.统计灵敏度分析估计胎儿酒精谱系障碍患病率。
Reprod Toxicol. 2019 Jun;86:62-67. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
9
The Inflammatory Potential of the Diet at Midlife Is Associated with Later Healthy Aging in French Adults.饮食在中年时期的炎症潜能与法国成年人的健康老龄化有关。
J Nutr. 2018 Mar 1;148(3):437-444. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxx061.
10
The Inflammatory Potential of the Diet Is Associated with Depressive Symptoms in Different Subgroups of the General Population.饮食的炎症潜能与普通人群不同亚组中的抑郁症状相关。
J Nutr. 2017 May;147(5):879-887. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.245167. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Propensity Score Calibration and its Alternatives.倾向评分校准及其替代方法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(10):1122-1123. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm068.
2
Evaluation of computer-generated reminders to improve CD4 laboratory monitoring in sub-Saharan Africa: a prospective comparative study.评估计算机生成的提醒以改善撒哈拉以南非洲的 CD4 实验室监测:一项前瞻性比较研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):150-5. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.005520. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
3
Formulating tightest bounds on causal effects in studies with unmeasured confounders.在存在未测量混杂因素的研究中,对因果效应设定最严格的界限。
Stat Med. 2008 Dec 30;27(30):6597-611. doi: 10.1002/sim.3430.
4
Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.未测量混杂因素的外部调整和敏感性分析的偏倚公式。
Ann Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;18(8):637-46. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.04.003.
5
The sign of the bias of unmeasured confounding.未测量混杂因素的偏倚迹象。
Biometrics. 2008 Sep;64(3):702-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00957.x. Epub 2007 Dec 31.
6
Performance of propensity score calibration--a simulation study.倾向得分校准的性能——一项模拟研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 May 15;165(10):1110-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm074. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
7
Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.缺失数据与因果推断模型中的双重稳健估计
Biometrics. 2005 Dec;61(4):962-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377.x.
8
Marginal structural models for estimating the effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy initiation on CD4 cell count.用于估计高效抗逆转录病毒治疗开始对CD4细胞计数影响的边际结构模型。
Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Sep 1;162(5):471-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi216. Epub 2005 Aug 2.
9
Bounding causal effects under uncontrolled confounding using counterfactuals.使用反事实方法在未控制混杂因素的情况下界定因果效应。
Epidemiology. 2005 Jul;16(4):548-55. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000166500.23446.53.
10
Sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding assuming a marginal structural model for repeated measures.采用重复测量的边际结构模型对未测量的混杂因素进行敏感性分析。
Stat Med. 2004 Mar 15;23(5):749-67. doi: 10.1002/sim.1657.