• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从行政数据中识别儿童糖尿病的分类算法验证。

Validation of classification algorithms for childhood diabetes identified from administrative data.

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Pediatr Diabetes. 2012 May;13(3):229-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00795.x. Epub 2011 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00795.x
PMID:21771232
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Type 1 diabetes is the most common form of diabetes among children; however, the proportion of cases of childhood type 2 diabetes is increasing. In Canada, the National Diabetes Surveillance System (NDSS) uses administrative health data to describe trends in the epidemiology of diabetes, but does not specify diabetes type. The objective of this study was to validate algorithms to classify diabetes type in children <20 yr identified using the NDSS methodology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We applied the NDSS case definition to children living in British Columbia between 1 April 1996 and 31 March 2007. Through an iterative process, four potential classification algorithms were developed based on demographic characteristics and drug-utilization patterns. Each algorithm was then validated against a gold standard clinical database.

RESULTS

Algorithms based primarily on an age rule (i.e., age <10 at diagnosis categorized type 1 diabetes) were most sensitive in the identification of type 1 diabetes; algorithms with restrictions on drug utilization (i.e., no prescriptions for insulin ± glucose monitoring strips categorized type 2 diabetes) were most sensitive for identifying type 2 diabetes. One algorithm was identified as having the optimal balance of sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) for the identification of both type 1 (Sn: 98.6%; Sp: 78.2%; PPV: 97.8%) and type 2 diabetes (Sn: 83.2%; Sp: 97.5%; PPV: 73.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Demographic characteristics in combination with drug-utilization patterns can be used to differentiate diabetes type among cases of pediatric diabetes identified within administrative health databases. Validation of similar algorithms in other regions is warranted.

摘要

目的

1 型糖尿病是儿童中最常见的糖尿病类型;然而,儿童 2 型糖尿病的比例正在增加。在加拿大,国家糖尿病监测系统(NDSS)使用行政健康数据来描述糖尿病流行病学的趋势,但未指定糖尿病类型。本研究的目的是验证用于分类使用 NDSS 方法学识别的<20 岁儿童糖尿病类型的算法。

患者和方法

我们应用 NDSS 病例定义,对 1996 年 4 月 1 日至 2007 年 3 月 31 日期间居住在不列颠哥伦比亚省的儿童进行了研究。通过迭代过程,基于人口统计学特征和药物利用模式,制定了四种潜在的分类算法。然后,将每种算法与金标准临床数据库进行验证。

结果

主要基于年龄规则(即诊断时年龄<10 岁归类为 1 型糖尿病)的算法对 1 型糖尿病的识别最敏感;对药物利用有一定限制的算法(即无胰岛素处方±葡萄糖监测条归类为 2 型糖尿病)对识别 2 型糖尿病最敏感。确定了一种算法,其在识别 1 型(Sn:98.6%;Sp:78.2%;PPV:97.8%)和 2 型糖尿病(Sn:83.2%;Sp:97.5%;PPV:73.7%)时具有最佳的敏感性(Sn)和特异性(Sp)之间的平衡。

结论

人口统计学特征与药物利用模式相结合可用于区分行政健康数据库中识别的儿科糖尿病病例的糖尿病类型。需要在其他地区验证类似的算法。

相似文献

1
Validation of classification algorithms for childhood diabetes identified from administrative data.从行政数据中识别儿童糖尿病的分类算法验证。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2012 May;13(3):229-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00795.x. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
2
Application of a national administrative case definition for the identification of pre-existing diabetes mellitus in pregnancy.应用国家行政病例定义来识别孕期的既往糖尿病。
Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2012 Jun;32(3):113-20.
3
Validation of a health administrative data algorithm for assessing the epidemiology of diabetes in Canadian children.验证一种用于评估加拿大儿童糖尿病流行病学的健康行政数据算法。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2010 Mar;11(2):122-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00539.x. Epub 2009 Jun 5.
4
Validation of diabetes case definitions using administrative claims data.利用行政索赔数据验证糖尿病病例定义。
Diabet Med. 2011 Apr;28(4):424-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03238.x.
5
Validating ICD coding algorithms for diabetes mellitus from administrative data.验证来自行政数据的糖尿病 ICD 编码算法。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Aug;89(2):189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.03.007. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
6
[Clinical heterogeneity of childhood diabetes in Baranya county].[巴拉尼亚县儿童糖尿病的临床异质性]
Orv Hetil. 2002 Nov 3;143(44):2489-92.
7
Development and validation of algorithms to identify newly diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes in pediatric population using electronic medical records and claims data.利用电子病历和理赔数据开发和验证用于识别儿科人群中新诊断的 1 型和 2 型糖尿病的算法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Feb;28(2):234-243. doi: 10.1002/pds.4728. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
8
Trends in diabetes mellitus among privately insured children, 1998-2002.1998 - 2002年有私人保险的儿童中糖尿病的发病趋势。
Ambul Pediatr. 2006 May-Jun;6(3):178-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2006.01.001.
9
A Systematic Review of Case-Identification Algorithms Based on Italian Healthcare Administrative Databases for Two Relevant Diseases of the Endocrine System: Diabetes Mellitus and Thyroid Disorders.基于意大利医疗行政数据库对内分泌系统两种相关疾病(糖尿病和甲状腺疾病)的病例识别算法的系统评价。
Epidemiol Prev. 2019 Jul-Aug;43(4 Suppl 2):17-36. doi: 10.19191/EP19.4.S2.P008.089.
10
Validation of algorithms to ascertain clinical conditions and medical procedures used during pregnancy.验证用于确定妊娠期间临床情况和医疗程序的算法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Nov;20(11):1168-76. doi: 10.1002/pds.2217. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
A whole new ball game: a retrospective cohort study using healthcare administrative data to uncover predictors of timely transition from paediatric to adult type 1 diabetes care in British Columbia, Canada.一场全新的局面:一项回顾性队列研究,利用医疗管理数据揭示加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省1型糖尿病患儿及时过渡到成人护理的预测因素。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 21;15(7):e099379. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099379.
2
Developing a Computable Phenotype for Identifying Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Diabetes Using Electronic Health Records in the DiCAYA Network.利用糖尿病儿童、青少年和青年网络(DiCAYA Network)中的电子健康记录开发一种可计算的表型,用于识别患有糖尿病的儿童、青少年和青年。
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jun 1;48(6):914-921. doi: 10.2337/dc24-1972.
3
Developing an automated algorithm for identification of children and adolescents with diabetes using electronic health records from the OneFlorida+ clinical research network.
利用来自OneFlorida+临床研究网络的电子健康记录,开发一种用于识别患有糖尿病的儿童和青少年的自动化算法。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jan;27(1):102-110. doi: 10.1111/dom.15987. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
4
Control charts for chronic disease surveillance: testing algorithm sensitivity to changes in data coding.慢性病监测控制图:测试算法对数据编码变化的敏感性。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 28;22(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12328-w.
5
The accuracy of provider diagnosed diabetes type in youth compared to an etiologic criteria in the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.在青少年中,与病因标准相比,提供者诊断的糖尿病类型的准确性在 SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth 研究中。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2020 Dec;21(8):1403-1411. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13126. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
6
National diabetes registries: do they make a difference?国家糖尿病登记处:它们有作用吗?
Acta Diabetol. 2021 Mar;58(3):267-278. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01576-8. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
7
Validation of a type 1 diabetes algorithm using electronic medical records and administrative healthcare data to study the population incidence and prevalence of type 1 diabetes in Ontario, Canada.利用电子病历和行政医疗保健数据验证1型糖尿病算法,以研究加拿大安大略省1型糖尿病的人群发病率和患病率。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Jun;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001224.
8
Development and validation of algorithms to classify type 1 and 2 diabetes according to age at diagnosis using electronic health records.开发和验证使用电子健康记录根据诊断时的年龄对 1 型和 2 型糖尿病进行分类的算法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Feb 24;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00921-3.
9
Developing a case definition for type 1 diabetes mellitus in a primary care electronic medical record database: an exploratory study.在初级保健电子病历数据库中制定1型糖尿病的病例定义:一项探索性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2019 May 6;7(2):E246-E251. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180142. Print 2019 Apr-Jun.
10
Measuring diabetes guideline adherence with claims data: systematic construction of indicators and related challenges.利用索赔数据衡量糖尿病指南的遵循情况:指标的系统构建及相关挑战。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 24;9(4):e027138. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027138.