Luz Gustavo Oliveira, Maluf-Filho Fauze, Matuguma Sérgio Eiji, Hondo Fábio Yuji, Ide Edson, Melo Jeane Martins, Cheng Spencer, Sakai Paulo
Gustavo Oliveira Luz, Fauze Maluf-Filho, Sérgio Eiji Matuguma, Fábio Yuji Hondo, Edson Ide, Jeane Martins Melo, Spencer Cheng, Paulo Sakai, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo University Medical School, São Paulo 05612000, Brazil.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May 16;3(5):95-100. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v3.i5.95.
To compare band ligation (BL) with endoscopic sclerotherapy (SCL) in patients admitted to an emergency unit for esophageal variceal rupture.
A prospective, randomized, single-center study without crossover was conducted. After endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal variceal rupture, patients were randomized into groups for SCL or BL treatment. Sclerotherapy was performed by ethanolamine oleate intravascular injection both above and below the rupture point, with a maximum volume of 20 mL. For BL patients, banding at the rupture point was attempted, followed by ligation of all variceal tissue of the distal esophagus. Primary outcomes for both groups were initial failure of bleeding control (5 d), early re-bleeding (5 d to 6 wk), and complications, including mortality. From May 2005 to May 2007, 100 patients with variceal bleeding were enrolled in the study: 50 SCL and 50 BL patients. No differences between groups were observed across gender, age, Child-Pugh status, presence of shock at admission, mean hemoglobin levels, and variceal size.
No differences were found between groups for bleeding control, early re-bleeding rates, complications, or mortality. After 6 wk, 36 (80%) SCL and 33 (77%) EBL patients were alive and free of bleeding. A statistically significant association between Child-Pugh status and mortality was found, with 16% mortality in Child A and B patients and 84% mortality in Child C patients (P<0.001).
Despite the limited number of patients included, our results suggest that SCL and BL are equally efficient for the control of acute variceal bleeding.
比较在因食管静脉曲张破裂而入住急诊科的患者中,套扎术(BL)与内镜下硬化治疗(SCL)的效果。
进行了一项前瞻性、随机、单中心且无交叉的研究。在内镜诊断食管静脉曲张破裂后,将患者随机分为接受SCL或BL治疗的组。硬化治疗通过在破裂点上方和下方血管内注射油酸乙醇胺进行,最大体积为20 mL。对于BL患者,尝试在破裂点进行套扎,随后结扎食管远端的所有曲张组织。两组的主要结局指标为出血控制的初始失败(5天)、早期再出血(5天至6周)以及并发症,包括死亡率。从2005年5月至2007年5月,100例静脉曲张出血患者纳入研究:50例接受SCL治疗,50例接受BL治疗。两组在性别、年龄、Child-Pugh分级状态、入院时是否存在休克、平均血红蛋白水平以及静脉曲张大小方面均未观察到差异。
两组在出血控制、早期再出血率、并发症或死亡率方面均未发现差异。6周后,36例(80%)接受SCL治疗的患者和33例(77%)接受EBL治疗的患者存活且未出血。发现Child-Pugh分级状态与死亡率之间存在统计学显著关联,Child A和B级患者的死亡率为16%,Child C级患者的死亡率为84%(P<0.001)。
尽管纳入的患者数量有限,但我们的结果表明,SCL和BL在控制急性静脉曲张出血方面同样有效。