• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寻找换位思考基因:方法学中的陷阱

On the hunt for the gene of perspective taking: pitfalls in methodology.

作者信息

Miklósi Adám, Topál József

机构信息

Department of Ethology, Lorand Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Learn Behav. 2011 Dec;39(4):310-3. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0038-2.

DOI:10.3758/s13420-011-0038-2
PMID:21773679
Abstract

In this commentary, we evaluate the methodology of Udell, Dorey, and Wynne's (Learning & Behavior, in press) experiment in controlling for environmental factors and argue that their conclusion is not supported. In particular, we emphasise that comparative studies on dogs and wolves need to ensure that both species enjoyed the same rearing history, are comparable in age, and have the same experience with the testing conditions. We also argue that the utilisation of shelter dogs does not control for genetic effects on social behaviour. Finally, we propose a synergetic model to account for both genetic and environmental effects on interspecific social behaviour in dogs and wolves.

摘要

在这篇评论中,我们评估了乌德尔、多里和韦恩(《学习与行为》,即将发表)在控制环境因素方面的实验方法,并认为他们的结论缺乏依据。具体而言,我们强调对狗和狼的比较研究需要确保两个物种具有相同的饲养历史、年龄相当,并且在测试条件方面有相同的经历。我们还认为,使用收容所的狗并不能控制基因对社会行为的影响。最后,我们提出了一个协同模型,以解释基因和环境对狗和狼种间社会行为的影响。

相似文献

1
On the hunt for the gene of perspective taking: pitfalls in methodology.寻找换位思考基因:方法学中的陷阱
Learn Behav. 2011 Dec;39(4):310-3. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0038-2.
2
Theory of mind in dogs?: examining method and concept.狗的心理理论?:审视方法与概念。
Learn Behav. 2011 Dec;39(4):314-7. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0041-7.
3
Theory of mind in dogs: is the perspective-taking task a good test?犬类的心理理论:观点采择任务是一项好的测试吗?
Learn Behav. 2011 Dec;39(4):303-5. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0037-3.
4
Evaluating the logic of perspective-taking experiments.评估换位思考实验的逻辑性。
Learn Behav. 2011 Dec;39(4):306-9. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0040-8.
5
Reevaluating canine perspective-taking behavior.重新评估犬类的换位思考行为。
Learn Behav. 2011 Dec;39(4):318-23. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0043-5.
6
Can your dog read your mind?: Understanding the causes of canine perspective taking.你的狗狗能读懂你的心思吗?:理解犬类换位思考的成因。
Learn Behav. 2011 Dec;39(4):289-302. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0034-6.
7
Adult, intensively socialized wolves show features of attachment behaviour to their handler.成年、社会化程度高的狼对其 handler 表现出依恋行为的特征。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 14;10(1):17296. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74325-0.
8
Sociability and gazing toward humans in dogs and wolves: Simple behaviors with broad implications.狗和狼的社交性及对人类的凝视:具有广泛影响的简单行为。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 Jan;105(1):68-75. doi: 10.1002/jeab.191.
9
When dogs look back: inhibition of independent problem-solving behaviour in domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) compared with wolves (Canis lupus).当狗回头时:与狼(犬属灰狼)相比,家犬(犬属灰狼家犬亚种)独立解决问题行为的抑制
Biol Lett. 2015 Sep;11(9):20150489. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0489.
10
Dogs and wolves do not differ in their inhibitory control abilities in a non-social test battery.在一组非社会性测试中,狗和狼在抑制控制能力方面没有差异。
Anim Cogn. 2019 Jan;22(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1216-9. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Domestication and Experience on the Social Interaction of Dogs and Wolves With a Human Companion.驯化与经验对狗和狼与人类同伴社交互动的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 23;11:785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00785. eCollection 2020.
2
Effect of age on discrimination learning, reversal learning, and cognitive bias in family dogs.年龄对家养犬辨别学习、逆向学习和认知偏差的影响。
Learn Behav. 2018 Dec;46(4):537-553. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0357-7.
3
Self domestication and the evolution of language.自我驯化与语言的进化

本文引用的文献

1
Can your dog read your mind?: Understanding the causes of canine perspective taking.你的狗狗能读懂你的心思吗?:理解犬类换位思考的成因。
Learn Behav. 2011 Dec;39(4):289-302. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0034-6.
2
Genome-wide SNP and haplotype analyses reveal a rich history underlying dog domestication.全基因组 SNP 和单体型分析揭示了狗驯化的丰富历史。
Nature. 2010 Apr 8;464(7290):898-902. doi: 10.1038/nature08837. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
3
What did domestication do to dogs? A new account of dogs' sensitivity to human actions.驯化对狗产生了什么影响?一种解释狗对人类行为敏感的新观点。
Biol Philos. 2018;33(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s10539-018-9612-8. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
4
Domestic dogs and puppies can use human voice direction referentially.家养犬和幼犬能够参照性地使用人类的语音指令。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 May 7;281(1785):20133201. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3201. Print 2014 Jun 22.
5
Social learning from humans or conspecifics: differences and similarities between wolves and dogs.从人类或同物种中进行社会学习:狼和狗之间的差异和相似之处。
Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 3;4:868. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00868. eCollection 2013.
6
Man's underground best friend: domestic ferrets, unlike the wild forms, show evidence of dog-like social-cognitive skills.人类的地下好伙伴:与野生种类不同,家养雪貂表现出类似狗的社交认知技能。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043267. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
7
Reevaluating canine perspective-taking behavior.重新评估犬类的换位思考行为。
Learn Behav. 2011 Dec;39(4):318-23. doi: 10.3758/s13420-011-0043-5.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 May;85(2):327-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00104.x. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
4
Explaining dog wolf differences in utilizing human pointing gestures: selection for synergistic shifts in the development of some social skills.解释狗狼在利用人类指示手势方面的差异:协同转变的选择在一些社会技能的发展中。
PLoS One. 2009 Aug 28;4(8):e6584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006584.
5
Early adolescent outcomes of institutionally deprived and non-deprived adoptees. III. Quasi-autism.机构收养的贫困儿童和非贫困儿童的青少年早期结局。III. 准自闭症。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;48(12):1200-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01792.x.
6
Selection for tameness has changed brain gene expression in silver foxes.对温顺性的选择改变了银狐大脑中的基因表达。
Curr Biol. 2005 Nov 22;15(22):R915-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.009.
7
Genetic structure of the purebred domestic dog.纯种家犬的遗传结构。
Science. 2004 May 21;304(5674):1160-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1097406.
8
A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do.一个巨大差异的简单原因:狼不会回头看人类,但狗会。
Curr Biol. 2003 Apr 29;13(9):763-6. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00263-x.
9
The Wilhelmine E. Key 1978 invitational lecture. Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication.1978年威廉明·E·基伊邀请赛演讲。作为驯化因素的不稳定选择。
J Hered. 1979 Sep-Oct;70(5):301-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a109263.