Division of Cardiology, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, 515 State Street, Suite 2700, Chicago, IL 60654, USA.
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2011 Oct;13(5):373-80. doi: 10.1007/s11883-011-0190-3.
With the increasing use of drug therapy and lifestyle modification for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, there remain questions on how to quantify residual risk, particular in patients with diabetes mellitus or obesity. Clinicians have turned to other screening modalities to identify individuals who would benefit from even more intensive therapy or to identify those with difficult-to-assess risk factors. Once a patient has been identified for aggressive risk factor modification, lipid biomarkers such as Apo B, LDL-P, and Lp (a) can potentially have clinical utility, and inflammatory markers such as hs-CRP may be useful for evaluating residual risk.
随着药物治疗和生活方式改变在心血管疾病一级和二级预防中的应用日益增多,人们仍然存在如何量化残余风险的问题,特别是在糖尿病或肥胖患者中。临床医生已经转向其他筛查方法,以确定哪些人将从更强化的治疗中获益,或确定那些具有难以评估的危险因素的人。一旦确定患者需要积极进行危险因素修正,载脂蛋白 B、LDL-P 和 Lp(a) 等脂类生物标志物可能具有临床效用,hs-CRP 等炎症标志物可能有助于评估残余风险。