• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新使用他汀类药物患者中,邮购药店用药与当地药店用药对 LDL-C 控制的比较效果。

The comparative effectiveness of mail order pharmacy use vs. local pharmacy use on LDL-C control in new statin users.

机构信息

Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Dec;26(12):1396-402. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1805-7. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-011-1805-7
PMID:21773848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3235607/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mail order pharmacies are commonly used to deliver CVD risk factor medications. Previous studies have shown that mail order pharmacy use is associated with greater medication adherence; however, no studies have examined whether mail order pharmacy use is related to improved CVD risk factor outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the comparative effectiveness of mail order pharmacy vs. local pharmacy use on LDL-C control in new statin users.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

PATIENTS

100,298 adult Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) members who were new users of statins between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2007.

MEASUREMENTS

The main outcome measure was LDL-C control in the 3-15 month period after statin therapy was initiated.

RESULTS

After adjustment for patient, clinical, and census-block characteristics, and for potential unmeasured differences between mail order and local KPNC pharmacy users with instrumental variables analysis, 85.0% of patients who used the mail order pharmacy to deliver their statin at any time achieved target LDL-C levels compared with 74.2% of patients who only used the local KPNC pharmacy to dispense the statin (p < 0.001). Greater adjusted rates of LDL-C control in mail order pharmacy users were seen across all gender and race/ethnicity subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Mail order pharmacy use was positively associated with LDL-C control in new statin users. Future research should continue to explore the relationship between mail order pharmacy use and outcomes, and address how to appropriately target mail order services to patients most likely to benefit without compromising patient choice, care, and safety.

摘要

背景

邮购药房常用于配送 CVD 风险因素药物。先前的研究表明,使用邮购药房与更高的药物依从性相关;然而,尚无研究检验使用邮购药房是否与改善 CVD 风险因素结局相关。

目的

检验新使用他汀类药物患者中,邮购药房与当地药房使用对 LDL-C 控制的比较效果。

设计

观察性队列研究。

患者

100298 名 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2007 年 12 月 31 日期间,新使用他汀类药物的 Kaiser Permanente Northern California(KPNC)成年会员。

测量

主要结局指标为他汀类药物治疗开始后 3-15 个月期间的 LDL-C 控制情况。

结果

经患者、临床和普查街区特征调整后,以及通过工具变量分析对邮购和当地 KPNC 药房使用者之间潜在的未测量差异进行调整,与仅使用当地 KPNC 药房配药的患者相比,任何时候使用邮购药房配送其他汀类药物的患者中有 85.0%达到 LDL-C 目标水平(p<0.001)。在所有性别和种族/民族亚组中,邮购药房使用者的 LDL-C 控制率更高。

结论

新使用他汀类药物患者中,使用邮购药房与 LDL-C 控制呈正相关。未来的研究应继续探索邮购药房使用与结局之间的关系,并解决如何将邮购服务有针对性地提供给最有可能受益的患者,同时又不损害患者的选择、护理和安全的问题。

相似文献

1
The comparative effectiveness of mail order pharmacy use vs. local pharmacy use on LDL-C control in new statin users.新使用他汀类药物患者中,邮购药店用药与当地药店用药对 LDL-C 控制的比较效果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Dec;26(12):1396-402. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1805-7. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
2
Helping our patients to adhere to chronic medications: a new arrow for the quiver.帮助我们的患者坚持服用慢性疾病药物:箭袋中的一支新箭。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Dec;26(12):1394-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1909-0.
3
The association between achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal and statin treatment in an employee population.在员工群体中,实现低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)目标与他汀类药物治疗之间的关联。
Popul Health Manag. 2010 Feb;13(1):1-8. doi: 10.1089/pop.2009.0020.
4
Mail-order pharmacy use and adherence to diabetes-related medications.邮购药店用药与糖尿病相关药物的依从性。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan;16(1):33-40.
5
A Retrospective Database Study Comparing Diabetes-Related Medication Adherence and Health Outcomes for Mail-Order Versus Community Pharmacy.一项回顾性数据库研究比较了邮购与社区药房的糖尿病相关药物依从性和健康结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Mar;25(3):332-340. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.3.332.
6
Safety and effectiveness of mail order pharmacy use in diabetes.邮购药房在糖尿病治疗中的安全性和有效性。
Am J Manag Care. 2013 Nov;19(11):882-7.
7
Mail-order pharmacy use and medication adherence among Medicare Part D beneficiaries with diabetes.邮购药房使用与糖尿病 Medicare Part D 受益人的药物依从性。
J Med Econ. 2011;14(5):562-7. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.598200. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
8
Factors associated with choice of pharmacy setting among DoD health care beneficiaries aged 65 years or older.65岁及以上国防部医疗保健受益人群中与药房选择相关的因素。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 Oct;13(8):677-86. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.8.677.
9
Effect of rosuvastatin compared with other statins on lipid levels and National Cholesterol Education Program goal attainment for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in a usual care setting.在常规护理环境中,瑞舒伐他汀与其他他汀类药物相比对血脂水平及达到国家胆固醇教育计划低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标的影响。
Pharmacotherapy. 2006 Apr;26(4):469-78. doi: 10.1592/phco.26.4.469.
10
Opportunities to encourage mail order pharmacy delivery service use for diabetes prescriptions: a qualitative study.鼓励使用邮购药房配送服务来交付糖尿病处方的机会:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 25;19(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4250-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of alternative care pathways adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of non-communicable diseases at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand.新冠疫情期间泰国一家三级医院采用的替代护理途径对非传染性疾病管理的影响。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Aug 27;18(1):2544644. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2544644. eCollection 2025.
2
Satisfaction and preference for home delivery pharmaceutical services among patients attending primary care settings in Qatar during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,卡塔尔初级保健机构就诊患者对家庭送药服务的满意度和偏好:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 17;14(10):e082842. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082842.
3
Combining zip code-based population data and pharmacy administrative claims data to create measures of social determinants of health.利用邮政编码人口数据和药房管理索赔数据来创建健康社会决定因素的衡量指标。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Apr;30(4):364-375. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.4.364.
4
Rethinking access to care: A spatial-economic analysis of the potential impact of pharmacy closures in the United States.重新思考医疗服务可及性:美国关闭药店的潜在影响的空间经济分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 27;18(7):e0289284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289284. eCollection 2023.
5
The Impact of Electronic Health Record Interventions on Patient Access to Post-Hospital Discharge Prescriptions.电子健康记录干预措施对患者获取出院后处方的影响。
Hosp Pharm. 2023 Apr;58(2):212-218. doi: 10.1177/00185787221130689. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
6
Home Drug Delivery Service from the Perspective of Community Pharmacy Staff in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯社区药房工作人员视角下的家庭送药服务
Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Nov 29;10(6):162. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10060162.
7
Associations between pharmacy choice and influenza vaccination: Mail order vs community pharmacy users.药店选择与流感疫苗接种之间的关联:邮购与社区药店使用者。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Dec;28(12):1379-1391. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.12.1379.
8
Public Perceptions About Home Delivery of Medication Service and Factors Associated with the Utilization of This Service.公众对药品上门配送服务的认知以及与该服务使用相关的因素。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Aug 22;16:2259-2269. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S377558. eCollection 2022.
9
Remodeling the Medication Collection Process With Prescription in Locker Box (PILBOX): Prospective Cross-sectional Study.使用智能药盒(PILBOX)重塑配药收集流程:前瞻性横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 27;24(6):e23266. doi: 10.2196/23266.
10
The role of integrated medical and prescription drug plans in addressing racial and ethnic disparities in medication adherence.综合医疗和处方药计划在解决药物治疗依从性方面的种族和民族差异中的作用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Mar;28(3):379-386. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.3.379.

本文引用的文献

1
The implications of therapeutic complexity on adherence to cardiovascular medications.治疗复杂性对心血管药物依从性的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 May 9;171(9):814-22. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.495.
2
Revealed preference for community and mail service pharmacy.社区和邮购服务药店的实证偏好。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2011 Jan-Feb;51(1):50-7. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2011.09161.
3
Antihypertensive medication adherence and subsequent healthcare utilization and costs.抗高血压药物的依从性与随后的医疗保健利用和费用。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Aug;16(8):568-76.
4
Health insurance and use of alternative medicine in Mexico.墨西哥的健康保险和替代医学的使用。
Health Policy. 2010 Nov;98(1):50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.04.006. Epub 2010 May 23.
5
A comparison of diabetes medication adherence and healthcare costs in patients using mail order pharmacy and retail pharmacy.比较使用邮购药店和零售药店的患者的糖尿病药物依从性和医疗保健成本。
J Med Econ. 2010;13(2):203-11. doi: 10.3111/13696991003741801.
6
Mail-order pharmacy use and adherence to diabetes-related medications.邮购药店用药与糖尿病相关药物的依从性。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan;16(1):33-40.
7
A comparison of mail-service and retail community pharmacy claims in 5 prescription benefit plans.5种处方福利计划中邮购服务药房与零售社区药房索赔情况的比较。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2009 Jun;5(2):133-42. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2008.06.002. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
8
Identifying risk factors for racial disparities in diabetes outcomes: the translating research into action for diabetes study.识别糖尿病结局种族差异的风险因素:糖尿病研究将研究转化为行动
Med Care. 2009 Jun;47(6):700-6. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e318192609d.
9
Factors associated with choice of pharmacy setting among DoD health care beneficiaries aged 65 years or older.65岁及以上国防部医疗保健受益人群中与药房选择相关的因素。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 Oct;13(8):677-86. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.8.677.
10
Drug utilization and cost in a Medicaid population: a simulation study of community vs. mail order pharmacy.医疗补助人群的药物使用与成本:社区药房与邮购药房的模拟研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul 30;7:122. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-122.