• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放式与微创腰椎减压术的并发症比较。

Complications of open compared to minimally invasive lumbar spine decompression.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 2210, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Oct;18(10):1360-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.02.022. Epub 2011 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2011.02.022
PMID:21775145
Abstract

Minimally invasive modalities have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of neurogenic claudication. Direct comparisons, however, between complication rates of these newer techniques with open surgical techniques for lumbar decompression are lacking. This single-institution study examined neurogenic claudicants between August 2007 and June 2009. A total of 26 patients received open surgical decompression, and 23 patients microendoscopic decompression. Baseline demographic characteristics, peri-operative morbidity and mortality, length of hospital stay, and final disposition following hospitalization were recorded. Morbidity was divided into major and minor categories as defined by degree of requisite intervention and adverse impact on hospital stay. Average age, number of surgical levels, and pre-operative American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Index scores were similar in each group (p>0.05). While minimally invasive surgery may be associated with slightly longer operative times, there is decreased blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and likely decreased requirements for ancillary support services upon discharge.

摘要

微创方法已被证明在治疗神经性跛行方面有效。然而,这些新技术与腰椎减压的开放式手术技术之间的并发症发生率的直接比较仍然缺乏。本单中心研究于 2007 年 8 月至 2009 年 6 月期间对神经性跛行患者进行了研究。共有 26 例患者接受了开放式手术减压,23 例患者接受了微创减压。记录了基线人口统计学特征、围手术期发病率和死亡率、住院时间以及住院后的最终情况。发病率根据所需干预的程度和对住院时间的不利影响分为主要和次要两类。每组的平均年龄、手术节段数和术前美国麻醉医师协会身体状况指数评分相似(p>0.05)。虽然微创手术可能与手术时间稍长有关,但出血量减少、住院时间缩短,并且出院时可能对辅助支持服务的需求减少。

相似文献

1
Complications of open compared to minimally invasive lumbar spine decompression.开放式与微创腰椎减压术的并发症比较。
J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Oct;18(10):1360-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.02.022. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
2
Complications associated with minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症微创减压相关并发症
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 May;19(3):161-6. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000188663.46391.73.
3
Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.减压性腰椎椎板切除术技术比较:微创与“经典”开放手术入路
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2008 Apr;51(2):100-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1022542.
4
Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older.老年患者的微创腰椎减压术:50例75岁及以上患者的手术结果
Neurosurgery. 2007 Mar;60(3):503-9; discussion 509-10. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000255332.87909.58.
5
Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.腰椎保留肌肉的椎板间减压术:一种治疗腰椎管狭窄症的微创新手术
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 15;34(8):E276-80. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318195d943.
6
Biomechanical assessment of minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a cadaver study.腰椎管狭窄症微创减压的生物力学评估:一项尸体研究
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Oct;22(7):486-91. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31818d7dc9.
7
Mini-open versus open decompression and fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis.腰椎退变性滑脱伴狭窄的微创开放减压融合术与开放减压融合术对比
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2011 Dec;40(12):E257-61.
8
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.经皮椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 1;35(17):1615-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c70fe3.
9
Open versus minimally invasive lumbar microdiscectomy: comparison of operative times, length of hospital stay, narcotic use and complications.开放性与微创腰椎间盘切除术:手术时间、住院时间、麻醉药物使用及并发症的比较
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2008 Feb;51(1):30-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1004543.
10
Technical advances in minimally invasive surgery: direct decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.微创外科技术进展:腰椎管狭窄症的直接减压。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 15;35(26 Suppl):S287-93. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182023268.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression (MILD) in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized and Prospective Trials.腰椎管狭窄症患者的微创腰椎减压术(MILD):随机和前瞻性试验的系统评价
J Pain Res. 2025 Jul 11;18:3527-3540. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S521038. eCollection 2025.
2
Rates of achieving meaningful outcomes after undergoing minimally-invasive far lateral tubular decompression.接受微创极外侧椎管减压术后获得有意义结果的比率。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Apr 15;26(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08446-w.
3
Evolving Role of Lumbar Decompression: A Narrative Review.
腰椎减压术不断演变的作用:一篇叙述性综述。
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Mar 6;19(1):117-128. doi: 10.14444/8702.
4
Open laminectomy vs. minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a review.开放性椎板切除术与微创椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的综述
Front Surg. 2024 Nov 7;11:1357897. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1357897. eCollection 2024.
5
Comparison of Microendoscopic Laminotomy (MEL) Versus Spinous Process-Splitting Laminotomy (SPSL) for Multi Segmental Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.显微内镜下椎板切开术(MEL)与棘突劈开椎板切开术(SPSL)治疗多节段腰椎管狭窄症的比较
Cureus. 2022 Feb 9;14(2):e22067. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22067. eCollection 2022 Feb.
6
Use of a High-Fidelity Training Simulator for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Increases Working Knowledge and Technical Skills Among Orthopedic and Neurosurgical Trainees.使用高保真训练模拟器进行微创腰椎减压可提高骨科和神经外科实习生的实用知识和技术技能。
Global Spine J. 2023 Oct;13(8):2182-2192. doi: 10.1177/21925682221076044. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
7
Is Less Really More? Economic Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Surgery.少真的就是多吗?微创手术的经济学评估。
Global Spine J. 2021 Apr;11(1_suppl):30S-36S. doi: 10.1177/2192568220958403. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
8
Endoscopic Versus Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: An International, Multi-Institutional Analysis of Outcomes and Adverse Events.内镜下与开放性腰椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症:一项关于疗效和不良事件的国际多机构分析
Global Spine J. 2020 Sep;10(6):720-728. doi: 10.1177/2192568219872157. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
9
Cerebrospinal fluid leaks after spine tumor resection: avoidance, recognition and management.脊柱肿瘤切除术后脑脊液漏:预防、识别与处理
Ann Transl Med. 2019 May;7(10):217. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.01.04.
10
Aperius interspinous device for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a review.用于退行性腰椎管狭窄症的Aperius棘突间装置:综述
Neurosurg Rev. 2016 Apr;39(2):197-205; discussion 205. doi: 10.1007/s10143-015-0664-9. Epub 2015 Sep 2.