• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于退行性腰椎管狭窄症的Aperius棘突间装置:综述

Aperius interspinous device for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a review.

作者信息

Ramesh Ashwanth, Lyons Frank, Kelleher Michael

机构信息

RCSI, Department of Anatomy, St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2016 Apr;39(2):197-205; discussion 205. doi: 10.1007/s10143-015-0664-9. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1007/s10143-015-0664-9
PMID:26324829
Abstract

With an aging population, degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) leading to neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) is a growing problem. For patients suffering from this condition, interspinous process distraction devices (IPDs) offer an effective and cheap alternative to conservative or decompressive surgery. Aperius is one such device that has been gaining popularity for its percutaneous insertion under local anesthetic, short operative time, and low risk of complications. The main objective of this review was to carry out a comprehensive search of the literature to evaluate the effectiveness and potential complications of Aperius. A database search, including PubMed, Clinical trials.gov, Cochrane (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Scopus, was carried out to identify relevant articles written in English reporting on complications with a minimum 12-month follow-up. The literature search resulted in six eligible studies; two nonrandomized comparative and four prospective case series were available. The analysis revealed that in total, 433 patients underwent treatment with Aperius, with all studies demonstrating an improvement in outcome measures. The average follow-up was 17 months with an overall complication rate of 10.62%. Overall, the quality of evidence is low, suggesting that currently, the evidence is not compelling and further prospective randomized trials including cost-effectiveness studies are required.

摘要

随着人口老龄化,导致神经源性间歇性跛行(NIC)的退变性腰椎管狭窄症(DLSS)问题日益严重。对于患有这种疾病的患者,棘突间撑开装置(IPD)为保守治疗或减压手术提供了一种有效且廉价的替代方案。Aperius就是这样一种装置,因其可在局部麻醉下经皮插入、手术时间短且并发症风险低而越来越受欢迎。本综述的主要目的是全面检索文献,以评估Aperius的有效性和潜在并发症。我们进行了数据库检索,包括PubMed、Clinical trials.gov、Cochrane(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE和Scopus,以识别用英文撰写的、报告了至少12个月随访期并发症情况的相关文章。文献检索得到了六项符合条件的研究;其中有两项非随机对照研究和四项前瞻性病例系列研究。分析显示,总共有433例患者接受了Aperius治疗,所有研究均表明治疗效果有所改善。平均随访时间为17个月,总体并发症发生率为10.62%。总体而言,证据质量较低,这表明目前证据并不充分,需要进一步开展包括成本效益研究在内的前瞻性随机试验。

相似文献

1
Aperius interspinous device for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a review.用于退行性腰椎管狭窄症的Aperius棘突间装置:综述
Neurosurg Rev. 2016 Apr;39(2):197-205; discussion 205. doi: 10.1007/s10143-015-0664-9. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
2
Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.经皮棘突间撑开器植入术与开放式减压手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Spine J. 2011 Oct;11(10):933-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.419.
3
Clinical evaluation of the preliminary safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive interspinous process device APERIUS(®) in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication.APERIUS(®)微创棘突间装置治疗伴有症状性神经源性间歇性跛行的退变性腰椎管狭窄症的初步安全性和有效性的临床评估。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Dec;21(12):2565-72. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2330-z. Epub 2012 May 8.
4
Aperius PercLID stand alone interspinous system for the treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis: experience on 152 cases.用于治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的Aperius PercLID独立棘突间系统:152例经验
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 May;23(3):203-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31819b08da.
5
Interspinous spacer decompression (X-STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disk disease: a multicenter study with a minimum 3-year follow-up.用于腰椎管狭窄症和退行性椎间盘疾病的棘突间撑开减压术(X-STOP):一项至少随访3年的多中心研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;124:166-74. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
6
X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.X 型截骨术与减压手术治疗腰椎源性神经间歇性跛行的随机对照试验:2 年随访。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Aug 1;38(17):1436-42. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828ba413.
7
Is the interspinous process device safe and effective in elderly patients with lumbar degeneration? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.棘突间装置在老年腰椎退变患者中是否安全有效?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):881-891. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08119-z. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
8
One-year follow-up of a series of 100 patients treated for lumbar spinal canal stenosis by means of HeliFix interspinous process decompression device.对采用HeliFix棘突间减压装置治疗腰椎管狭窄症的100例患者进行为期一年的随访。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:176936. doi: 10.1155/2014/176936. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
9
Interspinous process devices for treatment of degenerative lumbar spine stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.棘突间装置治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0199623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199623. eCollection 2018.
10
Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic intermittent claudication and treatment with the Aperius PercLID System: a preliminary report.退行性腰椎椎管狭窄症伴神经性间歇性跛行的 Aperius PercLID 系统治疗:初步报告。
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Jun;28(6):E3. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1034.

引用本文的文献

1
Axial loading during MRI reveals insufficient effect of percutaneous interspinous implants (Aperius™ PerCLID™) on spinal canal area.轴向加载磁共振成像显示经皮棘突间植入物(Aperius™ PerCLID™)对椎管面积的效果不足。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Jan;29(1):122-128. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06159-y. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons.退行性腰椎的运动保留技术:过去、现在与未来展望。
SAS J. 2011 Sep 1;5(3):75-89. doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2011.05.001. eCollection 2011.
2
The development of new research methods for the valuation of EQ-5D-5L.用于评估EQ-5D-5L的新研究方法的发展
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Jul;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-3. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0502-3.
3
Percutaneous interspinous spacer versus open decompression: a 2-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.
经皮棘突间撑开器与开放性减压术的比较:2 年临床疗效和生活质量随访。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Sep;22(9):2015-21. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2790-9. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
4
Interspinous distractor devices for the management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a miracle cure for a common problem?用于治疗腰椎管狭窄症的棘突间撑开装置:一种针对常见问题的神奇疗法?
Br J Neurosurg. 2012 Aug;26(4):445-9. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2012.680630. Epub 2012 May 15.
5
Clinical evaluation of the preliminary safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive interspinous process device APERIUS(®) in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication.APERIUS(®)微创棘突间装置治疗伴有症状性神经源性间歇性跛行的退变性腰椎管狭窄症的初步安全性和有效性的临床评估。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Dec;21(12):2565-72. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2330-z. Epub 2012 May 8.
6
Usefulness of the core outcome measures index in daily clinical practice for assessing patients with degenerative lumbar disease.核心结局指标指数在日常临床实践中对退行性腰椎疾病患者评估的实用性。
Adv Orthop. 2012;2012:474685. doi: 10.1155/2012/474685. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
7
Lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with Aperius perclid interspinous system.应用 Aperius 经皮棘突间系统治疗腰椎管狭窄症。
Eur Spine J. 2012 May;21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S69-74. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2222-2. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
8
Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.经皮棘突间撑开器植入术与开放式减压手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Spine J. 2011 Oct;11(10):933-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.419.
9
Complications of open compared to minimally invasive lumbar spine decompression.开放式与微创腰椎减压术的并发症比较。
J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Oct;18(10):1360-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.02.022. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
10
[A comparative study between Coflex interspinous dynamic reconstruction and lumbar 360 degrees fusion in treating single-level degenerative lumbar spinal disorders].Coflex棘突间动态重建与腰椎360度融合治疗单节段退变性腰椎疾病的对比研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jun;25(6):693-8.