Suppr超能文献

经间质近距离放疗治疗肛管鳞癌 20 年的经验。

Twenty-year experience in the management of squamous cell anal canal carcinoma with interstitial brachytherapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, 77030 Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Oncol. 2011 Jul;13(7):472-9. doi: 10.1007/s12094-011-0684-z.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate clinical characteristics, local control, acute and late toxicity, and prognostic factors of patients with anal canal carcinoma treated with brachytherapy.

METHODS

From 1989 to 2009, 38 patients were treated with iridium 192 low-dose-rate (N = 26) or pulsed-dose-rate (N = 12) interstitial brachytherapy at a single institution. The median age was 62 years (range, 38-86 years). The TNM classification was as follows: 10 T1, 22 T2, 5 T3 and 1 T4; 32 N0, 3 N1 and 3 N2. Most patients (32/38) received either a first course of radiochemotherapy (N = 22) or radiotherapy alone (N=10) consisting of a total delivered dose of 45 Gy to the pelvis (range, 32-50) followed by a boost a median of 18 days later of 15-35 Gy (median 20 Gy) to the anal canal. The remaining 6 cases were treated with brachytherapy alone (dose range, 60-65 Gy).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 30 months (range, 4-200), 2- and 5-year local control rates were 91% and 87%, respectively. Preservation of the anal sphincter was achieved in 32 patients (84%). Three patients experienced incontinence after brachytherapy. Only 2 patients showed chronic mucositis grade 3/4. Age proved to be a statistically significant prognostic factor for overall survival in the univariate (p = 0.033) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.018). Concurrent chemotherapy with external beam radiotherapy was a statistically significant prognostic factor for disease-free survival in the univariate and multivariate analyses (p = 0.007 and p = 0.044, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Interstitial brachytherapy appears to be an effective and well tolerated treatment for anal carcinoma offering both high local tumour control and anal sphincter preservation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在回顾性评估接受近距离放疗的肛管癌患者的临床特征、局部控制、急性和晚期毒性以及预后因素。

方法

1989 年至 2009 年,38 例患者在一家机构接受铱 192 低剂量率(N=26)或脉冲剂量率(N=12)间质近距离放疗。中位年龄为 62 岁(范围 38-86 岁)。TNM 分期如下:10 例 T1,22 例 T2,5 例 T3,1 例 T4;32 例 N0,3 例 N1,3 例 N2。大多数患者(32/38)接受了放化疗(N=22)或单纯放疗(N=10),骨盆总剂量 45Gy(范围 32-50),随后中位 18 天(中位时间 20Gy)加量至肛管 15-35Gy(中位剂量 20Gy)。其余 6 例单独接受近距离放疗(剂量范围 60-65Gy)。

结果

中位随访 30 个月(范围 4-200),2 年和 5 年局部控制率分别为 91%和 87%。32 例患者保留了肛门括约肌(84%)。3 例患者在近距离放疗后出现失禁。仅有 2 例患者出现慢性黏膜炎 3/4 级。年龄在单因素(p=0.033)和多因素分析(p=0.018)中均为总生存期的统计学显著预后因素。同期放化疗对外照射的无病生存率有统计学显著的预后作用,在单因素和多因素分析中(p=0.007 和 p=0.044)。

结论

间质近距离放疗似乎是一种有效且耐受良好的肛管癌治疗方法,既能提供高局部肿瘤控制率,又能保留肛门括约肌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验