Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Palliat Med. 2012 Jan;26(1):43-9. doi: 10.1177/0269216311413836. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
The Netherlands and Belgium legalized euthanasia in 2002.
In this study we describe and compare cases of reported euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the first 5 years of legislation.
DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The databases of the cases reported in Belgium and the Netherlands were made available by the review committees. We compared characteristics of all cases reported between September 2002-December 2007.
In the Netherlands 10,319 cases were reported, in Belgium 1917. Gender and age distributions were similar in both countries. Most patients suffered from cancer (83-87%), but patients more often suffered from diseases of the nervous system in Belgium (8.3% vs. 3.9%). In the Netherlands, reported euthanasia more often occurred at home compared with Belgium (81% vs. 42%), where it occurred more often in hospital (52% vs. 9%). In the Netherlands, all cases were based on the oral request of a competent patient. In Belgium, 2.1% of the reported cases was based on an advance directive.
We conclude that countries debating legislation must realise that the rules and procedures for euthanasia they would agree upon and the way they are codified or not into law may influence the practice that develops once the legislation is effected or what part of that practice is reported.
荷兰和比利时于 2002 年使安乐死合法化。
本研究旨在描述并比较立法实施的头 5 年报告的安乐死和医师协助自杀案例。
设计/环境/参与者:由审查委员会提供了比利时和荷兰报告案例的数据库。我们比较了 2002 年 9 月至 2007 年 12 月报告的所有案例的特征。
荷兰报告了 10319 例,比利时报告了 1917 例。两国的性别和年龄分布相似。大多数患者患有癌症(83-87%),但比利时的神经系统疾病患者更多(8.3%比 3.9%)。在荷兰,与比利时相比(81%比 42%),在家中报告的安乐死更为常见,而在比利时,在医院中更为常见(52%比 9%)。在荷兰,所有案例都是基于有能力的患者的口头请求。在比利时,报告的案例中有 2.1%是基于预先指示。
我们的结论是,正在辩论立法的国家必须意识到,他们同意的安乐死规则和程序,以及将其编纂或不编纂为法律的方式,可能会影响立法生效后的实践,或者报告的实践的哪一部分。