Spangaro Jo, Poulos Roslyn G, Zwi Anthony B
The University of New South Wales, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Sydney, Australia.
Violence Vict. 2011;26(1):130-44. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.26.1.130.
Routine screening for intimate partner violence (IPV) has been widely introduced in health settings, yet screening rates are often low. A screening policy was introduced statewide in Australia in antenatal, mental health, and substance abuse services. Annual snapshot indicates a sustained screening rate of 62%-75% since 2003. Focus group research with health care workers from 10 services found that initial introduction of screening was facilitated by brief, scripted questions embedded into assessment schedules, training, and access to referral services. Over time, familiarity and women's favorable reactions reinforced practice. Barriers remain, including lack of privacy, tensions about limited confidentiality, and frustration when women remain unsafe. Screening added to the complexity of work, but was well accepted by workers, and increased awareness of and responsiveness to IPV.
亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的常规筛查已在医疗机构中广泛推行,但筛查率往往较低。澳大利亚在全州范围内的产前、心理健康和药物滥用服务中推行了一项筛查政策。年度简要情况表明,自2003年以来筛查率持续保持在62%-75%。对来自10个服务机构的医护人员进行的焦点小组研究发现,嵌入评估表中的简短、有脚本的问题、培训以及转介服务的提供,促进了筛查的初步推行。随着时间的推移,熟悉程度以及女性的积极反应强化了这种做法。障碍仍然存在,包括缺乏隐私、对有限保密性的担忧,以及女性仍处于不安全状态时的挫败感。筛查增加了工作的复杂性,但受到工作人员的广泛接受,并提高了对亲密伴侣暴力的认识和应对能力。