Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Indoor Air. 2012 Feb;22(1):43-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00734.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
The health effects associated with exposure to ozone range from respiratory irritation to increased mortality. In this paper, we explore the use of three green building materials and an activated carbon (AC) mat that remove ozone from indoor air. We studied the effects of long-term exposure of these materials to real environments on ozone removal capability and pre- and post-ozonation emissions. A field study was completed over a 6-month period, and laboratory testing was intermittently conducted on material samples retrieved from the field. The results show sustained ozone removal for all materials except recycled carpet, with greatest ozone deposition velocity for AC mat (2.5-3.8 m/h) and perlite-based ceiling tile (2.2-3.2 m/h). Carbonyl emission rates were low for AC across all field sites. Painted gypsum wallboard and perlite-based ceiling tile had similar overall emission rates over the 6-month period, while carpet had large initial emission rates of undesirable by-products that decayed rapidly but remained high compared with other materials. This study confirms that AC mats and perlite-based ceiling tile are viable surfaces for inclusion in buildings to remove ozone without generating undesirable by-products. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS The use of passive removal materials for ozone control could decrease the need for, or even render unnecessary, active but energy consuming control solutions. In buildings where ozone should be controlled (high outdoor ozone concentrations, sensitive populations), materials specifically designed or selected for removing ozone could be implemented, as long as ozone removal is not associated with large emissions of harmful by-products. We find that activated carbon mats and perlite-based ceiling tiles can provide substantial, long-lasting, ozone control.
与臭氧暴露相关的健康影响范围从呼吸道刺激到死亡率增加。在本文中,我们探索了三种绿色建筑材料和一种活性炭(AC)垫的使用,它们可以去除室内空气中的臭氧。我们研究了这些材料在真实环境中长期暴露对去除臭氧能力以及预和后臭氧化排放的影响。完成了为期 6 个月的现场研究,并间歇性地对从现场取回的材料样本进行了实验室测试。结果表明,除了再生地毯外,所有材料都能持续去除臭氧,AC 垫(2.5-3.8 m/h)和珍珠岩天花板(2.2-3.2 m/h)的臭氧沉积速度最大。AC 在所有现场的羰基排放量都很低。在 6 个月的时间里,涂有油漆的石膏墙板和珍珠岩天花板的总排放量相似,而地毯的初始排放速度很高,产生了迅速降解但仍高于其他材料的不良副产物。本研究证实,AC 垫和珍珠岩天花板是可行的表面材料,可用于去除臭氧而不会产生不良副产物。实际意义 被动去除材料用于臭氧控制可以减少或甚至使主动但耗能的控制解决方案变得不必要。在需要控制臭氧的建筑物中(室外臭氧浓度高、人口敏感),可以使用专门设计或选择用于去除臭氧的材料,只要臭氧去除不与大量有害副产物的排放相关联。我们发现,活性炭垫和珍珠岩天花板可以提供大量、持久的臭氧控制。