Mitrokhin S D, Sokolov A A
Antibiot Khimioter. 2011;56(1-2):29-34.
Rational position of voriconazole in the treatment of oncologic inpatients was shown and the criteria of its use in the algorithms of the therapy and prophylaxis of nosocomial fungal infections were developed. The clinical trial enrolled 50 patients with oncologic pathologies. The patients were divided into two groups of possible invasive candidiasis risk. The patients of one group were treated with fluconazole (Diflucan) and those of the other group were treated with voriconazole (Vifend). The spectrum of the hospital fungal flora was determined and susceptibility of 310 clinically important opportunistic fungi was investigated. All the isolates of Candida albicans and C.tropicalis were susceptible to amphotericin B, fluconazole and voriconazole and 79 and 50% of the isolates were susceptible to intraconazole respectively. As for the C.krusei isolates, 67% was susceptible to amphotericin B, 50% was susceptible to fluconazole, 100% was susceptible to voriconazole and none of the strains was susceptible to intraconazole. By the clinical efficacy voriconazole was superior to fluconazole and comparable with amphotericin B, while superior to it by the number of the side effects and by the cost of the treatment course. It was concluded that voriconazole should be considered as the main agent in the antifungal therapy of oncologic patients.
展示了伏立康唑在肿瘤住院患者治疗中的合理地位,并制定了其在医院获得性真菌感染治疗和预防方案中的使用标准。该临床试验纳入了50例患有肿瘤疾病的患者。这些患者被分为两组,具有不同的侵袭性念珠菌病风险。一组患者接受氟康唑(大扶康)治疗,另一组患者接受伏立康唑(威凡)治疗。确定了医院真菌菌群的种类,并研究了310种临床重要机会性真菌的敏感性。所有白色念珠菌和热带念珠菌分离株对两性霉素B、氟康唑和伏立康唑敏感,分别有79%和50%的分离株对伊曲康唑敏感。至于克鲁斯念珠菌分离株,67%对两性霉素B敏感,50%对氟康唑敏感,100%对伏立康唑敏感,且无一菌株对伊曲康唑敏感。就临床疗效而言,伏立康唑优于氟康唑,与两性霉素B相当,但在副作用数量和治疗疗程费用方面优于两性霉素B。得出的结论是,伏立康唑应被视为肿瘤患者抗真菌治疗的主要药物。