Temple University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Sports Med. 2011 Aug 1;41(8):613-9. doi: 10.2165/11590670-000000000-00000.
Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular, first described in 1970, were initially thought to be rare injuries. Heightened awareness and increased participation in athletics has resulted in more frequent diagnosis and more aggressive treatment. The vascular supply of the tarsal navicular results in a relatively avascular zone in the central one-third, which experiences severe compressive forces during explosive manoeuvers such as jumping and sprinting. Repetitive activities can result in stress reactions or even fracture. Patients often initially complain of vague midfoot pain localized to the medial border of the foot. The pain is usually exacerbated by activity and relieved with rest. The diagnosis of tarsal navicular stress fracture is challenging because of the high false negative rate of plain radiographs. Additional diagnostic testing with bone scan, CT and MRI are often required for diagnosis. The proper treatment of tarsal navicular stress fractures has become a topic of debate as surgical intervention for these injuries has increased. In a recent meta-analysis, Torg et al. found that 96% of tarsal navicular stress fractures treated with non-weight-bearing (NWB) conservative treatment for 5 weeks went on to successful outcomes. However, only 44% of patients treated with weight-bearing (WB) conservative treatment had successful outcomes. Surgical treatment resulted in successful outcome in 82% of patients. Interestingly, the meta-analysis also found that fracture type did not correlate with outcomes, regardless of treatment. The meta-analysis also found no difference in time to return to activity between patients treated surgically and those who underwent NWB conservative treatment. The recent literature indicates that patients are undergoing surgery or are receiving WB conservative management as a first-line treatment option with the expectation that they will return to their activity more quickly. Although surgical treatment seems increasingly common, the results statistically demonstrate an inferior trend to conservative NWB management. Conservative NWB management is the standard of care for initial treatment of both partial and complete stress fractures of the tarsal navicular. WB conservative treatment and surgical intervention are not recommended.
足舟骨应力性骨折于 1970 年首次描述,最初被认为是罕见损伤。由于对该病认识的提高和参与运动的人数增加,诊断更为频繁,治疗也更积极。足舟骨的血供导致其中央三分之一区域相对无血管,在跳跃和短跑等爆发性运动中会承受严重的压缩力。重复活动可导致应力反应甚至骨折。患者最初常诉足底中部模糊疼痛,位于足内侧缘。疼痛通常在活动时加重,休息时缓解。由于 X 线平片的假阴性率高,足舟骨应力性骨折的诊断具有挑战性。常需进行骨扫描、CT 和 MRI 等其他诊断性检查以明确诊断。随着这些损伤的手术干预增加,对足舟骨应力性骨折的适当治疗已成为一个争论的话题。在最近的一项荟萃分析中,Torg 等人发现,96%的足舟骨应力性骨折患者接受 5 周非负重(NWB)保守治疗后取得了良好的结果。然而,仅 44%接受负重(WB)保守治疗的患者取得了良好的结果。手术治疗的患者有 82%取得了良好的结果。有趣的是,荟萃分析还发现,无论治疗方法如何,骨折类型与结果均无相关性。该荟萃分析还发现,手术治疗与 NWB 保守治疗的患者在恢复活动时间方面无差异。最近的文献表明,患者接受手术或接受 WB 保守治疗作为一线治疗选择,期望能更快地恢复活动。尽管手术治疗似乎越来越常见,但统计结果显示,与 NWB 保守治疗相比,手术治疗有一个较差的趋势。NWB 保守治疗是足舟骨部分和完全应力性骨折初始治疗的标准方法。不建议 WB 保守治疗和手术干预。