Li J, Kuk A Y C, Rush A J
Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Duke-National University of Singapore, Graduate Medical School, Singapore.
Psychol Med. 2012 Feb;42(2):309-16. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001280. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
The aim of the present study was to determine whether a combination of baseline features and early post-baseline depressive symptom changes have clinical value in predicting out-patient non-response in depressed out-patients after 8 weeks of medication treatment.
We analysed data from the Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes study for 447 participants with complete 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (QIDS-SR16) ratings at baseline and at treatment weeks 2, 4 and 8. We used a multi-time point, recursive subsetting approach that included baseline features and changes in QIDS-SR16 scores from baseline to weeks 2 and 4, to identify non-responders (<50% reduction in QIDS-SR16) at week 8 with a pre-specified accuracy level.
Pretreatment clinical features alone were not clinically useful predictors of non-response after 8 weeks of treatment. Baseline to week 2 symptom change identified 48 non-responders (of which 36 were true non-responders). This approach gave a clinically meaningful negative predictive value of 0.75. Symptom change from baseline to week 4 identified 79 non-responders (of which 60 were true non-responders), achieving the same accuracy. Symptom change at both weeks 2 and 4 identified 87 participants (almost 20% of the sample) as non-responders with the same accuracy. More participants with chronic than non-chronic index episodes could be accurately identified by week 4.
Specific baseline clinical features combined with symptom changes by weeks 2-4 can provide clinically actionable results, enhancing the efficiency of care by personalizing the treatment of depression.
本研究的目的是确定基线特征与基线后早期抑郁症状变化的组合在预测药物治疗8周后门诊抑郁症患者无反应方面是否具有临床价值。
我们分析了“联合用药改善抑郁结局”研究中的数据,该研究涉及447名参与者,他们在基线以及治疗第2、4和8周时完成了16项抑郁症状快速自评量表(QIDS-SR16)评分。我们采用多时间点递归子集法,该方法纳入基线特征以及从基线到第2周和第4周QIDS-SR16评分的变化,以在预先设定的准确度水平下识别第8周时的无反应者(QIDS-SR16评分降低<50%)。
仅治疗前临床特征在预测治疗8周后无反应方面并无临床实用价值。从基线到第2周的症状变化识别出48名无反应者(其中36名是真正的无反应者)。这种方法得出的临床意义上的阴性预测值为0.75。从基线到第4周的症状变化识别出79名无反应者(其中60名是真正的无反应者),准确度相同。第2周和第4周的症状变化均识别出87名参与者(几乎占样本的20%)为无反应者,准确度相同。到第4周时,可以更准确地识别出更多患有慢性而非非慢性索引发作的参与者。
特定的基线临床特征与第2至4周的症状变化相结合可提供具有临床可操作性的结果,通过使抑郁症治疗个性化提高护理效率。