• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

递归子集法识别 STAR*D 患者:提高治疗结果早期预测准确性并为个体化治疗提供信息的方法。

Recursive subsetting to identify patients in the STAR*D: a method to enhance the accuracy of early prediction of treatment outcome and to inform personalized care.

机构信息

Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, National University of Singapore, 6 Science Drive 2, Singapore 117546.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;71(11):1502-8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06168blu.

DOI:10.4088/JCP.10m06168blu
PMID:21114950
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There are currently no clinically useful assessments that can reliably predict--early in treatment--whether a particular depressed patient will respond to a particular antidepressant. We explored the possibility of using baseline features and early symptom change to predict which patients will and which patients will not respond to treatment.

METHOD

Participants were 2,280 outpatients enrolled in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study who had complete 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-self-report (QIDS-SR16) records at baseline, week 2, and week 6 (primary outcome) of treatment with citalopram. Response was defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in QIDS-SR16 score by week 6. By developing a recursive subsetting algorithm, we used both baseline variables and change in QIDS-SR16 scores from baseline to week 2 to predict response/nonresponse to treatment for as many patients as possible with controlled accuracy, while reserving judgment for the rest.

RESULTS

Baseline variables by themselves were not clinically useful predictors, whereas symptom change from baseline to week 2 identified 280 nonresponders, of which 227 were true nonresponders. By subsetting recursively according to both baseline features and symptom change, we were able to identify 505 nonresponders, of which 403 were true nonresponders, to achieve a clinically meaningful negative predictive value of 0.8, which was upheld in cross-validation analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Recursive subsetting based on baseline features and early symptom change allows predictions of nonresponse that are sufficiently certain for clinicians to spare identified patients from prolonged exposure to ineffective treatment, thereby personalizing depression management and saving time and cost.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00021528.

摘要

目的

目前尚无临床上有用的评估方法可以可靠地预测——在治疗早期——特定的抑郁患者是否会对特定的抗抑郁药产生反应。我们探讨了使用基线特征和早期症状变化来预测哪些患者会对治疗有反应,哪些患者不会有反应的可能性。

方法

共有 2280 名参加 Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression(STAR*D)研究的门诊患者入组,这些患者在基线、治疗第 2 周和第 6 周(主要结局)时使用西酞普兰完成了 16 项简短抑郁症状清单自评版(QIDS-SR16)的完整记录。以 QIDS-SR16 评分在第 6 周时降低≥50%为应答。通过开发递归子集算法,我们使用基线变量和从基线到第 2 周的 QIDS-SR16 评分变化来预测尽可能多的患者对治疗的反应/无反应,同时保留对其余患者的判断。

结果

基线变量本身不是临床有用的预测指标,而从基线到第 2 周的症状变化则确定了 280 名无反应者,其中 227 名是真正的无反应者。通过根据基线特征和症状变化递归子集化,我们能够识别出 505 名无反应者,其中 403 名是真正的无反应者,从而实现了具有临床意义的阴性预测值 0.8,这在交叉验证分析中得到了验证。

结论

基于基线特征和早期症状变化的递归子集化允许对无反应进行足够确定的预测,以便临床医生能够避免将确定的患者暴露于无效的治疗中,从而实现个体化的抑郁症管理并节省时间和成本。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00021528。

相似文献

1
Recursive subsetting to identify patients in the STAR*D: a method to enhance the accuracy of early prediction of treatment outcome and to inform personalized care.递归子集法识别 STAR*D 患者:提高治疗结果早期预测准确性并为个体化治疗提供信息的方法。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;71(11):1502-8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06168blu.
2
Impact of fatigue on outcome of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment: secondary analysis of STAR*D.疲劳对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗结果的影响:STAR*D研究的二次分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Oct;30(10):2109-18. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.936553. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
3
What to Expect When Switching to a Second Antidepressant Medication Following an Ineffective Initial SSRI: A Report From the Randomized Clinical STAR*D Study.在初始 SSRI 治疗无效后改用第二种抗抑郁药时的预期:来自随机临床试验 STAR*D 的报告。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 11;81(5):19m12949. doi: 10.4088/JCP.19m12949.
4
Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice.在STAR*D研究中采用基于测量的护理评估西酞普兰治疗抑郁症的疗效:对临床实践的启示
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;163(1):28-40. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.28.
5
A practical approach to the early identification of antidepressant medication non-responders.一种早期识别抗抑郁药物无反应者的实用方法。
Psychol Med. 2012 Feb;42(2):309-16. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001280. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
6
The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-report: a psychometric evaluation in patients with asthma and major depressive disorder.抑郁症状快速自评量表:哮喘合并重度抑郁症患者的心理测量学评估
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 May;100(5):433-8. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60467-X.
7
Sexual satisfaction and quality of life in major depressive disorder before and after treatment with citalopram in the STAR*D study.在 STAR*D 研究中,西酞普兰治疗前后重度抑郁障碍患者的性满意度和生活质量。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;74(3):256-61. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m07933.
8
Does the duration of index episode affect the treatment outcome of major depressive disorder? A STAR*D report.索引发作的持续时间是否会影响重度抑郁症的治疗结果?一项STAR*D报告。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;69(8):1246-56. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0807.
9
Self-reported depressive symptom measures: sensitivity to detecting change in a randomized, controlled trial of chronically depressed, nonpsychotic outpatients.自我报告的抑郁症状测量:在慢性抑郁、非精神病性门诊患者的随机对照试验中检测变化的敏感性。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005 Feb;30(2):405-16. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300614.
10
Response to a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (citalopram) in major depressive disorder with melancholic features: a STAR*D report.伴有抑郁特征的重度抑郁症对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(西酞普兰)的反应:STAR*D报告
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;69(12):1847-55. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n1201. Epub 2008 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Program of algorithm for pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorder in China: Benefits or not?中国重度抑郁症药物治疗算法方案:有益与否?
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 17;9(11):e20951. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20951. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Temporal multi-step predictive modeling of remission in major depressive disorder using early stage treatment data; STAR*D based machine learning approach.基于 STAR*D 的机器学习方法,利用早期治疗数据对重度抑郁症缓解进行时间多步预测建模。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Mar 1;324:286-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.076. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
3
Multi-omics driven predictions of response to acute phase combination antidepressant therapy: a machine learning approach with cross-trial replication.
多组学驱动的急性联合抗抑郁治疗反应预测:一种具有跨试验复制的机器学习方法。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 7;11(1):513. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01632-z.
4
Prediction of short-term antidepressant response using probabilistic graphical models with replication across multiple drugs and treatment settings.使用具有复制功能的概率图模型预测短期抗抑郁反应,该模型跨越多种药物和治疗环境。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Jun;46(7):1272-1282. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00943-x. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
5
The Predictive Validity of Machine Learning Models in the Classification and Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: State of the Art and Future Directions.机器学习模型在重度抑郁症分类与治疗中的预测效度:现状与未来方向
Front Psychiatry. 2020 May 25;11:472. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00472. eCollection 2020.
6
A Clinician's Perspective on Biomarkers.临床医生对生物标志物的看法。
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2018 Apr;16(2):124-134. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20170044. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
7
Entropy Learning for Dynamic Treatment Regimes.动态治疗方案的熵学习
Stat Sin. 2019;29(4):1633-1655. doi: 10.5705/ss.202018.0076.
8
Prediction of Acute-Phase Treatment Outcomes by Adding a Single-Item Measure of Activity Impairment to Symptom Measurement: Development and Validation of an Interactive Calculator from the STAR*D and CO-MED Trials.基于症状测量增加单一活动障碍指标预测急性期治疗结局:来自 STAR*D 和 CO-MED 试验的交互式计算器的开发和验证。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 May 1;22(5):339-348. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyz011.
9
Treatment-resistant depression as risk factor for substance use disorders-a nation-wide register-based cohort study.治疗抵抗性抑郁症是物质使用障碍的一个风险因素:一项全国范围内基于登记的队列研究。
Addiction. 2019 Jul;114(7):1274-1282. doi: 10.1111/add.14596. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
10
Predictive modeling of treatment resistant depression using data from STAR*D and an independent clinical study.使用来自 STAR*D 和一项独立临床研究的数据对治疗抵抗性抑郁症进行预测建模。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 7;13(6):e0197268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197268. eCollection 2018.