Suppr超能文献

两种西地那非片剂剂型在泰国健康男性志愿者单剂量给药后的相对生物利用度

Comparative bioavailability of two sildenafil tablet formulations after single-dose administration in healthy Thai male volunteers.

作者信息

Kanjanawart S, Gaysonsiri D, Tangsucharit P, Vannaprasaht S, Phunikhom K, Kaewkamson T, Wattanachai N, Tassaneeyakul W

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Aug;49(8):525-30. doi: 10.5414/cp201496.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rate and extent of absorption of two sildenafil tablet formulations (Tonafil®, T.O. Chemicals (1979) Ltd., Thailand as a test formulation and Viagra®, Pfizer Pty Limited., Australia as a reference formulation) in healthy Thai male volunteers after single-dose administration under fasting condition.

METHODS

A randomized crossover study with a washout period of 2 weeks was conducted in 20 healthy Thai male volunteers. The volunteers received either 100 mg of the reference or test formulation. Blood samples were collected at 0, 0.16, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 6, 9 and 12 h after drug administration. The plasma sildenafil concentrations were determined using a validated high performance liquid chromatography method. The pharmacokinetic parameters of sildenafil were calculated from the observed plasma concentration-time profiles by using a non-compartmental model.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The geometric means, C(max), of the reference and the test formulations were 696.42 and 734.06 ng/ml. The mean values of the AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf) of the test formulation were 2,073.03 and 2,237.37 ng × h/ml, while those of the reference formulation were 1,950.26 and 2,078.06 ng × h/ml. The geometric mean ratios (%) and 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the test and reference products for the log transformed C(max), AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf) of sildenafil were 105.40% (95.0 - 116.95%), 106.30% (99.74 - 113.28%) and 107.67% (100.83 - 116.48%). These values were within 80 to 125% of the US-FDA and the Thai-FDA criteria and therefore it can be concluded that the test formulation was bioequivalent to the reference formulation both in terms of rate and extent of absorption after single-dose administration under fasting condition.

摘要

目的

比较两种西地那非片剂制剂(泰国T.O. Chemicals (1979) Ltd.生产的托纳非®作为受试制剂,澳大利亚辉瑞有限公司生产的万艾可®作为参比制剂)在禁食条件下单次给药后,在健康泰国男性志愿者体内的吸收速率和吸收程度。

方法

对20名健康泰国男性志愿者进行了一项随机交叉研究,洗脱期为2周。志愿者分别接受100 mg参比制剂或受试制剂。给药后0、0.16、0.33、0.67、1、1.5、2、2.5、4、6、9和12小时采集血样。采用经过验证的高效液相色谱法测定血浆中西地那非的浓度。使用非房室模型根据观察到的血浆浓度-时间曲线计算西地那非的药代动力学参数。

结果与结论

参比制剂和受试制剂的几何均值C(max)分别为696.42和734.06 ng/ml。受试制剂的AUC(0-t)和AUC(0-inf)均值分别为2,073.03和2,237.37 ng×h/ml,而参比制剂的分别为1,950.26和2,078.06 ng×h/ml。西地那非经对数转换后的C(max)、AUC(0-t)和AUC(0-inf)的受试产品与参比产品的几何均值比(%)和90%置信区间(CI)分别为105.40%(95.0 - 116.95%)、106.30%(99.74 - 113.28%)和107.67%(100.83 - 116.48%)。这些值在美国食品药品监督管理局(US-FDA)和泰国食品药品监督管理局(Thai-FDA)标准的80%至125%范围内,因此可以得出结论,受试制剂在禁食条件下单次给药后的吸收速率和吸收程度方面与参比制剂生物等效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验