Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Universtat Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006 Feb;21(2):191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2005.07.010. Epub 2005 Aug 15.
Structure-activity relationships are indispensable to identify the most optimal antioxidants. The advantages of in vitro over in vivo experiments for obtaining these relationships are, that the structure is better defined in vitro, since less metabolism takes place. It is also the case that the concentration, a parameter that is directly linked to activity, is more accurately controlled. Moreover, the reactions that occur in vivo, including feed-back mechanisms, are often too multi-faceted and diverse to be compensated for during the assessment of a single structure-activity relationship. Pitfalls of in vitro antioxidant research include: (i) by definition, antioxidants are not stable and substantial amounts of oxidation products are formed and (ii) during the scavenging of reactive species, reaction products of the antioxidants accumulate. Another problem is that the maintenance of a defined concentration of antioxidants is subject to processes such as oxidation and the formation of reaction products during the actual antioxidant reaction, as well as the compartmentalization of the antioxidant and the reactive species in the in vitro test system. So determinations of in vitro structure-activity relationships are subject to many competing variables and they should always be evaluated critically.
结构-活性关系对于确定最佳抗氧化剂是不可或缺的。与体内实验相比,体外实验具有以下优势:可以更好地定义结构,因为体内代谢较少;而且可以更准确地控制与活性直接相关的浓度参数。此外,体内发生的反应,包括反馈机制,通常过于复杂和多样化,无法在评估单一结构-活性关系时得到补偿。体外抗氧化研究的陷阱包括:(i)根据定义,抗氧化剂不稳定,会形成大量氧化产物;(ii)在清除活性物质时,抗氧化剂的反应产物会积累。另一个问题是,抗氧化剂的定义浓度的维持受到氧化过程以及抗氧化反应过程中反应产物的形成、抗氧化剂和活性物质在体外测试系统中的区室化等过程的影响。因此,体外结构-活性关系的测定受到许多竞争变量的影响,应始终进行批判性评估。