Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jul;130(1):292-301. doi: 10.1121/1.3596475.
There are three standard methods for generating two channels of partially correlated noise: the two-generator method, the three-generator method, and the symmetric-generator method. These methods allow an experimenter to specify a target cross correlation between the two channels, but actual generated noises show statistical variability around the target value. Numerical experiments were done to compare the variability for those methods as a function of the number of degrees of freedom. The results of the experiments quantify the stimulus uncertainty in diverse binaural psychoacoustical experiments: incoherence detection, perceived auditory source width, envelopment, noise localization/lateralization, and the masking level difference. The numerical experiments found that when the elemental generators have unequal powers, the different methods all have similar variability. When the powers are constrained to be equal, the symmetric-generator method has much smaller variability than the other two.
双发生器方法、三发生器方法和对称发生器方法。这些方法允许实验者指定两个通道之间的目标互相关,但实际生成的噪声在目标值周围表现出统计可变性。进行了数值实验,以比较这些方法的可变性作为自由度数量的函数。实验结果量化了各种双耳心理声学实验中的刺激不确定性:不连贯性检测、感知听觉源宽度、包络、噪声定位/定位和掩蔽电平差。数值实验发现,当基本发生器的功率不相等时,不同的方法都具有相似的可变性。当功率受到限制相等时,对称发生器方法的可变性比其他两种方法小得多。