• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当我们在做我们正在做的事情时,我们是谁?:在伦理案例咨询中关注体现的案例。

Who are we when we are doing what we are doing?: the case for mindful embodiment in ethics case consultation.

机构信息

Hamilton Health Sciences, Mcmaster University Medical Center, ON, USA.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2011 Sep;25(7):370-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01913.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01913.x
PMID:21790691
Abstract

This paper explores the theory and practice of embodied epistemology or mindful embodiment in ethics case consultation. I argue that not only is this epistemology an ethical imperative to safeguard the integrity of this emerging profession, but that it has the potential to improve the quality of ethics consultation (EC). It also has implications for how ethics consultants are trained and how consultation services are organized. My viewpoint is informed by ethnographic research and by my experimental application of mindful embodiment to the development of an ethics consultation service. My argument proceeds in four phases. First I explore the notion of 'situatedness' in the bioethics literature, identifying gaps in the field's theories as they apply to EC. I then describe my theoretical approach to embodiment grounded in critical-interpretive medical anthropology and autoethnography. I use embodiment to refer to a moral epistemology grounded in the body, comprised of the interplay of physical, symbolic, intersubjective and political elements. Third, I describe how mindful embodiment can inform the role of the ethics consultant and the development of effective training techniques, vocabularies and processes for EC. I also discuss the benefits of this orientation, and the potential harms of ignoring the embodied dimensions of EC. My goals are to expose the fallacy of the 'theory-practice gap', to demonstrate how my own EC practice is deeply informed by this theoretical orientation, and to argue for a wider definition of what 'counts' as relevant theory for ethics consultation.

摘要

本文探讨了具身认识论或正念体现论在伦理案例咨询中的理论和实践。我认为,这种认识论不仅是保护这一新兴专业完整性的道德要求,而且有可能提高伦理咨询的质量。它还对伦理咨询师的培训方式和咨询服务的组织方式产生影响。我的观点是基于民族志研究和我对正念体现论在伦理咨询服务发展中的实验应用得出的。我的论点分四个阶段展开。首先,我在生物伦理学文献中探讨了“情境性”的概念,指出了该领域理论在应用于 EC 时存在的空白。然后,我描述了我基于批判-解释性医学人类学和自传体的具身理论方法。我使用“具身”来指代一种基于身体的道德认识论,它由身体、符号、主体间和政治元素的相互作用组成。第三,我描述了正念体现论如何为伦理咨询师的角色以及有效的培训技巧、词汇和 EC 流程提供信息。我还讨论了这种取向的好处,以及忽视 EC 体现维度的潜在危害。我的目标是揭示“理论-实践差距”的谬误,展示我自己的 EC 实践是如何深受这种理论取向的影响,并为伦理咨询中什么“算作”相关理论提出更广泛的定义。

相似文献

1
Who are we when we are doing what we are doing?: the case for mindful embodiment in ethics case consultation.当我们在做我们正在做的事情时,我们是谁?:在伦理案例咨询中关注体现的案例。
Bioethics. 2011 Sep;25(7):370-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01913.x.
2
Theory and practice of clinical ethics support services: narrative and hermeneutical perspectives.临床伦理支持服务的理论与实践:叙述与诠释学视角。
Bioethics. 2011 Sep;25(7):354-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01911.x.
3
Monological versus dialogical consciousness: two epistemological views on the use of theory in clinical ethical practice.独白意识与对话意识:临床伦理实践中理论运用的两种认识论观点。
Bioethics. 2011 Sep;25(7):361-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01912.x.
4
The authority of the clinical ethicist.临床伦理学家的权威。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1998 Nov-Dec;28(6):6-11.
5
Doing ethics at the bedside: reflections on the practice of ethics consultation.床边的伦理学实践:对伦理咨询实践的思考
Trends Health Care Law Ethics. 1995 Fall;10(4):17-21.
6
The role of emotions in moral case deliberation: theory, practice, and methodology.情绪在道德案例审议中的作用:理论、实践与方法。
Bioethics. 2011 Sep;25(7):383-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01914.x.
7
Keeping moral space open. New images of ethics consulting.保留道德空间。伦理咨询的新形象。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1993 Mar-Apr;23(2):33-40.
8
The question of method in ethics consultation.伦理咨询中的方法问题。
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Fall;1(4):31-41. doi: 10.1162/152651601317139360.
9
Why clinical ethics consultants might not want to be educators.临床伦理顾问为何可能不想成为教育者。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Fall;2(4):445-8.
10
Is ethics consultation dangerous?伦理咨询危险吗?
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Fall;2(4):442-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Ethics Consultations and the Necessity of NOT Meeting Expectations: I Never Promised You a Rose Garden.临床伦理咨询与不满足期望的必要性:我从未承诺过给你玫瑰园。
HEC Forum. 2024 Jun;36(2):147-165. doi: 10.1007/s10730-022-09496-6. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
2
Just a Collection of Recollections: Clinical Ethics Consultation and the Interplay of Evaluating Voices.只是一组回忆:临床伦理咨询与评估声音的相互作用
HEC Forum. 2016 Dec;28(4):301-320. doi: 10.1007/s10730-016-9301-4.
3
Conceptualizing boundaries for the professionalization of healthcare ethics practice: a call for empirical research.
界定医疗伦理实践专业化的边界:呼吁开展实证研究。
HEC Forum. 2014 Dec;26(4):325-41. doi: 10.1007/s10730-014-9240-x.