• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床伦理支持服务的理论与实践:叙述与诠释学视角。

Theory and practice of clinical ethics support services: narrative and hermeneutical perspectives.

机构信息

Ethics Unit of the Bern University Hospital in Switzerland.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2011 Sep;25(7):354-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01911.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01911.x
PMID:21790689
Abstract

In this paper we introduce narrative and hermeneutical perspectives to clinical ethics support services (CESS). We propose a threefold consideration of 'theory' and show how it is interwoven with 'practice' as we go along. First, we look at theory in its foundational role: in our case 'narrative ethics' and 'philosophical hermeneutics' provide a theoretical base for clinical ethics by focusing on human identities entangled in stories and on moral understanding as a dialogical process. Second, we consider the role of theoretical notions in helping practitioners to understand their situation in clinical ethics practice, by using notions like 'story', 'responsibility', or 'vulnerability' to make explicit and explain their practical experience. Such theoretical notions help us to interpret clinical situations from an ethical perspective and to foster moral awareness of practitioners. And, thirdly, we examine how new theoretical concepts are developed by interpreting practice, using practice to form and improve our ethical theory. In this paper, we discuss this threefold use of theory in clinical ethics support services by reflecting on our own theoretical assumptions, methodological steps and practical experiences as ethicists, and by providing examples from our daily work. In doing so, we illustrate that theory and practice are interwoven, as theoretical understanding is dependent upon practical experience, and vice-versa.

摘要

在本文中,我们将叙事和解释学视角引入临床伦理支持服务(CESS)。我们提出了对“理论”的三重考虑,并展示了在实践中如何将其与实践交织在一起。首先,我们从基础作用的角度来看待理论:在我们的案例中,“叙事伦理学”和“哲学解释学”通过关注纠缠在故事中的人类身份以及作为对话过程的道德理解,为临床伦理学提供了理论基础。其次,我们考虑了理论概念在帮助从业者理解临床伦理实践中的作用,通过使用“故事”、“责任”或“脆弱性”等概念来明确和解释他们的实际经验。这些理论概念有助于我们从伦理角度解释临床情况,并培养从业者的道德意识。第三,我们通过解释实践来研究如何通过实践来发展新的理论概念,使用实践来形成和改进我们的伦理理论。在本文中,我们通过反思我们作为伦理学家的理论假设、方法步骤和实践经验,并提供我们日常工作中的例子,讨论了临床伦理支持服务中这种三重理论用法。通过这样做,我们说明了理论和实践是交织在一起的,因为理论理解依赖于实践经验,反之亦然。

相似文献

1
Theory and practice of clinical ethics support services: narrative and hermeneutical perspectives.临床伦理支持服务的理论与实践:叙述与诠释学视角。
Bioethics. 2011 Sep;25(7):354-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01911.x.
2
Monological versus dialogical consciousness: two epistemological views on the use of theory in clinical ethical practice.独白意识与对话意识:临床伦理实践中理论运用的两种认识论观点。
Bioethics. 2011 Sep;25(7):361-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01912.x.
3
Empirical ethics as dialogical practice.作为对话实践的实证伦理学。
Bioethics. 2009 May;23(4):236-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01712.x.
4
Keeping moral space open. New images of ethics consulting.保留道德空间。伦理咨询的新形象。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1993 Mar-Apr;23(2):33-40.
5
The role of emotions in moral case deliberation: theory, practice, and methodology.情绪在道德案例审议中的作用:理论、实践与方法。
Bioethics. 2011 Sep;25(7):383-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01914.x.
6
[Discursiveness and co-authority in clinical ethics].[临床伦理学中的话语性与共同权威性]
J Int Bioethique. 2005 Sep-Dec;16(3-4):107-33, 174-5.
7
Who are we when we are doing what we are doing?: the case for mindful embodiment in ethics case consultation.当我们在做我们正在做的事情时,我们是谁?:在伦理案例咨询中关注体现的案例。
Bioethics. 2011 Sep;25(7):370-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01913.x.
8
Responsibility after the apparent end: 'following-up' in clinical ethics consultation.明显结束后的责任:临床伦理咨询中的“跟进”。
Bioethics. 2011 Sep;25(7):413-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01910.x.
9
The authority of the clinical ethicist.临床伦理学家的权威。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1998 Nov-Dec;28(6):6-11.
10
The fiction of bioethics: a precis.生物伦理学的虚构:概述
Am J Bioeth. 2001 Winter;1(1):40-3. doi: 10.1162/152651601750079050.

引用本文的文献

1
The Diversity Compass: a clinical ethics support instrument for dialogues on diversity in healthcare organizations.多样性指南针:一种临床伦理支持工具,用于医疗保健组织中关于多样性的对话。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jan 3;25(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00992-z.
2
Coaching doctors to improve ethical decision-making in adult hospitalised patients potentially receiving excessive treatment: Study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.培训医生改善成年住院患者接受过度治疗的伦理决策:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 21;18(3):e0281447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281447. eCollection 2023.
3
Clinical Ethics Consultation in Chronic Illness: Challenging Epistemic Injustice Through Epistemic Modesty.
慢性疾病的临床伦理咨询:通过认知谦逊应对认知不公正。
HEC Forum. 2024 Jun;36(2):131-145. doi: 10.1007/s10730-022-09494-8. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
4
Ethical issues in oncology practice: a qualitative study of stakeholders' experiences and expectations.肿瘤学实践中的伦理问题:利益相关者的经验和期望的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jun 30;23(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00803-x.
5
Conceptualizing and Fostering the Quality of CES Through a Dutch National Network on CES (NEON).通过荷兰 CES 国家网络(NEON)构思和培养 CES 质量。
HEC Forum. 2022 Jun;34(2):169-186. doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09432-6. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
6
Field-Testing the Euro-MCD Instrument: Important Outcomes According to Participants Before and After Moral Case Deliberation.现场测试 Euro-MCD 工具:根据参与者在道德案例讨论前后的重要结果。
HEC Forum. 2022 Mar;34(1):1-24. doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09421-9.
7
Clinical Ethics Support for Healthcare Personnel: An Integrative Literature Review.为医护人员提供临床伦理支持:一项综合文献综述
HEC Forum. 2017 Dec;29(4):313-346. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9325-4.
8
For an Ethnomethodology of healthcare ethics.为医疗保健伦理的民族方法论。
Health Care Anal. 2013 Dec;21(4):372-89. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0202-7.