Tunisian Research Laboratory Sports Performance Optimization, National Center of Medicine and Science in Sports, Tunis, Tunisia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Sep;25(9):2453-63. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31822a5a79.
The current literature recommends dynamic rather than static stretching for the athletic warm-up. Dynamic stretching and various conditioning stimuli are used to induce potentiation in subsequent athletic performance. However, it is unknown as to which type of activity in conjunction with dynamic stretching within a warm-up provides the optimal potentiation of vertical jump performance. It was the objective of the study to examine the possible potentiating effect of various types of conditioning stimuli with dynamic stretching. Twenty athletes participated in 6 protocols. All the experimental protocols included 10 minutes of dynamic stretching. After the dynamic stretching, the subjects performed a (a) concentric (DS/CON): 3 sets of 3 repetition maximum deadlift exercise; (b) isometric (DS/ISOM): 3 sets of 3-second maximum voluntary contraction back squats; (c) plyometric (DS/PLYO): 3 sets of 3 tuck jumps; (d) eccentric (DS/ECC): 3 modified drop jumps; (e) dynamic stretching only (DS), and (f) control protocol (CON). Before the intervention and at recovery periods of 15 seconds, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 minutes, the participants performed 1-2 maximal countermovement jumps. The DS and DS/CON protocols generally had a 95-99% likelihood of exceeding the smallest worthwhile change for vertical jump height, peak power, velocity and force. However, the addition of the deadlift to the DS did not augment the potentiating effect. Time-to-peak potentiation was variable between individuals but was most consistent between 3 and 5 minutes. Thus, the volume and the intensity associated with 10 minutes of dynamic stretching were sufficient to provide the potentiation of vertical jump characteristics. Additional conditioning activities may promote fatigue processes, which do not permit further potentiation.
目前的文献建议在运动热身中进行动态拉伸而非静态拉伸。动态拉伸和各种调节刺激被用来增强随后的运动表现。然而,在热身中,哪种类型的活动与动态拉伸相结合可以提供最佳的垂直跳跃表现增强效果,目前尚不清楚。本研究的目的是检验在动态拉伸过程中结合各种类型的调节刺激的可能增强效果。20 名运动员参加了 6 个方案。所有的实验方案都包括 10 分钟的动态拉伸。在动态拉伸之后,受试者进行了(a)向心(DS/CON):3 组 3 次最大重复举重练习;(b)等长(DS/ISOM):3 组 3 秒最大自主收缩深蹲;(c)弹震式(DS/PLYO):3 组 3 次抱膝跳;(d)离心(DS/ECC):3 次改良的跳落;(e)仅动态拉伸(DS),和(f)对照方案(CON)。在干预前和恢复期的 15 秒、4 分钟、8 分钟、12 分钟、16 分钟和 20 分钟,参与者进行了 1-2 次最大反跳。DS 和 DS/CON 方案通常有 95-99%的可能性超过垂直跳跃高度、峰值功率、速度和力量的最小有意义变化。然而,向 DS 添加举重并不能增强增强效果。峰时增强的时间因人而异,但在 3 到 5 分钟之间最为一致。因此,10 分钟的动态拉伸的量和强度足以提供垂直跳跃特征的增强。额外的调节活动可能会促进疲劳过程,从而不允许进一步增强。