• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吉西他滨/顺铂与 5-氟尿嘧啶/丝裂霉素 C 放化疗治疗局部晚期胰腺癌:93 例回顾性分析。

Gemcitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis of 93 patients.

机构信息

Radiation Oncology of the Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstraße 22, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2011 Jul 27;6:88. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-88.

DOI:10.1186/1748-717X-6-88
PMID:21794119
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3161863/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite of a growing number of gemcitabine based chemoradiotherapy studies in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), 5-fluorouracil based regimens are still regarded to be standard and the debate of superiority between the two drugs is going on. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the effect of two concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens using 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine to compare their effect and tolerance.

METHODS

We have performed a single centre retrospective analysis of 93 patients treated with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy of 55.8 Gray using either concurrent 5-fluorouracil, 1 g/m² on days 1-5 and 29-33 of radiotherapy and 10 mg/m² of mitomycin C on day 1, 29 of radiotherapy (FM group, 35 patients) versus gemcitabine (300 mg/m²) and cisplatin, (30 mg/m²) on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 (GC group, 58 patients). Primary endpoint was the median overall survival (OS) rate.

RESULTS

The median OS rate was 12.7 months in the GC group and 9.7 months in the FM group. The 1-year OS rate was 53% versus 40%, respectively (p = 0.009). GC led to more grade 3 leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia than FM, but not to more grade 4 myelosuppression. Thrombocytopenia was the most frequently observed grade 4 toxicity in both groups (11% after FM versus 12% after GC). No grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia was observed. Grade 3 nausea was more common in the FM group (20% versus 9%) and grade 4 nausea was observed in one patient per group only.

CONCLUSIONS

GC was superior to FM for overall survival and both regimens were similar in terms of tolerance. We conclude that GC leads to encouraging results and that the use of FM for chemoradiotherapy in LAPC cannot be recommended without concerns.

摘要

背景

尽管局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)的吉西他滨为基础的放化疗研究越来越多,但氟尿嘧啶为基础的方案仍被认为是标准方案,两种药物之间的优劣之争仍在继续。本回顾性分析的目的是评估使用氟尿嘧啶或吉西他滨的两种同期放化疗方案的效果,比较它们的效果和耐受性。

方法

我们对 93 例接受常规分割放疗(55.8Gy)的患者进行了单中心回顾性分析,这些患者分别接受了同期氟尿嘧啶(1g/m²,放疗第 1-5 天和第 29-33 天)和丝裂霉素 C(10mg/m²,放疗第 1 天和第 29 天)(FM 组,35 例)或吉西他滨(300mg/m²)和顺铂(30mg/m²)(GC 组,58 例)治疗。主要终点是中位总生存期(OS)率。

结果

GC 组的中位 OS 率为 12.7 个月,FM 组为 9.7 个月。1 年 OS 率分别为 53%和 40%(p=0.009)。GC 导致的 3 级白细胞减少和血小板减少比 FM 组更为常见,但没有导致 4 级骨髓抑制。血小板减少是两组中最常见的 4 级毒性(FM 组为 11%,GC 组为 12%)。未观察到 3/4 级发热性中性粒细胞减少症。FM 组 3/4 级恶心更为常见(20% vs. 9%),两组均有 1 例患者出现 4 级恶心。

结论

GC 在总生存方面优于 FM,两种方案在耐受性方面相似。我们得出结论,GC 带来了令人鼓舞的结果,因此,在没有顾虑的情况下,不能推荐 FM 用于 LAPC 的放化疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a6/3161863/87056a5c66ee/1748-717X-6-88-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a6/3161863/f1f88e973894/1748-717X-6-88-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a6/3161863/87056a5c66ee/1748-717X-6-88-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a6/3161863/f1f88e973894/1748-717X-6-88-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6a6/3161863/87056a5c66ee/1748-717X-6-88-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Gemcitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis of 93 patients.吉西他滨/顺铂与 5-氟尿嘧啶/丝裂霉素 C 放化疗治疗局部晚期胰腺癌:93 例回顾性分析。
Radiat Oncol. 2011 Jul 27;6:88. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-88.
2
Chemoradiotherapy with concurrent gemcitabine and cisplatin with or without sequential chemotherapy with gemcitabine/cisplatin vs chemoradiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer--a multi-centre randomised phase II study.吉西他滨和顺铂同步放化疗联合或不联合吉西他滨/顺铂序贯化疗与5-氟尿嘧啶同步放化疗治疗局部晚期胰腺癌患者的多中心随机II期研究
Br J Cancer. 2009 Dec 1;101(11):1853-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605420. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
3
Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas.基于吉西他滨的晚期胆管癌化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 6;4(4):CD011746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011746.pub2.
4
Irinotecan combined with gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and cisplatin (G-FLIP) is an effective and noncrossresistant treatment for chemotherapy refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer.伊立替康联合吉西他滨、5-氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和顺铂(G-FLIP)是一种治疗化疗难治性转移性胰腺癌的有效且无交叉耐药性的疗法。
Oncologist. 2001;6(6):488-95. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.6-6-488.
5
Phase II clinical trial of induction chemotherapy with fixed dose rate gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.局部晚期胰腺癌固定剂量率吉西他滨和顺铂诱导化疗联合卡培他滨同期放化疗的 II 期临床试验。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 Sep;70(3):381-9. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-1918-7. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
6
Full-dose gemcitabine is a more effective chemotherapeutic agent than 5-fluorouracil for concurrent chemoradiotherapy as first-line treatment in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.对于局部晚期胰腺癌的一线治疗,全剂量吉西他滨作为同步放化疗的化疗药物比5-氟尿嘧啶更有效。
Chemotherapy. 2014;60(3):191-9. doi: 10.1159/000375402. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
7
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.晚期胰腺癌的化疗与放疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 5;12(12):CD011044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011044.pub3.
8
Induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a Taiwan cooperative oncology group phase II study.吉西他滨、奥沙利铂和氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸联合诱导化疗联合放化疗治疗局部晚期胰腺癌患者:台湾肿瘤合作组 II 期研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Dec 1;81(5):e749-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.034. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
9
Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Full-dose Gemcitabine and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.诱导化疗后序贯全剂量吉西他滨与调强放射治疗用于可切除边缘和局部晚期胰腺腺癌
Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;39(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000003.
10
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin after incomplete (R1) resection of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.局部晚期胰腺癌不完全(R1)切除术后吉西他滨和顺铂同步放化疗。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Mar 1;58(3):768-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.07.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility analysis of conducting observational studies with the electronic health record.电子健康记录开展观察性研究的可行性分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Oct 28;19(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0939-0.
2
Gemcitabine Conjugated Chitosan and Double Antibodies (Abc-GC-Gemcitabine Nanoparticles) Enhanced Cytoplasmic Uptake of Gemcitabine and Inhibit Proliferation and Metastasis In Human SW1990 Pancreatic Cancer Cells.吉西他滨共轭壳聚糖与双抗体(Abc-GC-吉西他滨纳米颗粒)增强吉西他滨的细胞质摄取并抑制人SW1990胰腺癌细胞的增殖和转移。
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Apr 3;23:1613-1620. doi: 10.12659/msm.901292.
3
Modeling Combined Chemotherapy and Particle Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Gemcitabine in the chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.吉西他滨在局部晚期胰腺癌放化疗中的应用:一项荟萃分析。
Radiother Oncol. 2011 May;99(2):108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 May 14.
2
European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2011.欧洲 2011 年癌症死亡率预测。
Ann Oncol. 2011 Apr;22(4):947-956. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq774. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
3
The role of radiotherapy in multimodal treatment of pancreatic carcinoma.放射治疗在胰腺癌多模态治疗中的作用。
局部晚期胰腺癌联合化疗与粒子治疗的建模
Front Oncol. 2015 Jul 6;5:145. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00145. eCollection 2015.
4
Dihydromyricetin Enhances the Chemo-Sensitivity of Nedaplatin via Regulation of the p53/Bcl-2 Pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells.二氢杨梅素通过调控肝癌细胞中p53/Bcl-2信号通路增强奈达铂的化疗敏感性
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 27;10(4):e0124994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124994. eCollection 2015.
5
Genetic determinants and potential therapeutic targets for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.胰腺腺癌的遗传决定因素及潜在治疗靶点
Front Physiol. 2014 Mar 3;5:87. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00087. eCollection 2014.
Radiat Oncol. 2010 Jul 8;5:64. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-64.
4
Volumetric modulated arc therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.容积调强弧形治疗技术治疗晚期胰腺癌。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2010 Jul;186(7):382-7. doi: 10.1007/s00066-010-2094-5. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
5
Long-term outcome of mitomycin C- and 5-FU-based primary radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer.以丝裂霉素 C 和 5-FU 为基础的原发性放化疗治疗食管癌的长期结果。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2010 Jul;186(7):374-81. doi: 10.1007/s00066-010-2137-y. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
6
Pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 29;362(17):1605-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0901557.
7
Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages.胰腺癌的术前/新辅助治疗:反应和切除率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2010 Apr 20;7(4):e1000267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000267.
8
Downstaging of pancreatic carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.新辅助放化疗后胰腺癌降期
Strahlenther Onkol. 2009 Sep;185(9):557-66. doi: 10.1007/s00066-009-1977-9. Epub 2009 Sep 12.
9
Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study.一项III期试验,比较密集诱导放化疗(60 Gy,持续输注5-氟尿嘧啶和间歇顺铂)后序贯吉西他滨维持治疗与单纯吉西他滨治疗局部晚期不可切除胰腺癌的疗效。2000 - 01年FFCD/SFRO研究的最终结果。
Ann Oncol. 2008 Sep;19(9):1592-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn281. Epub 2008 May 7.
10
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms of DNA damage response genes are associated with overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.DNA损伤反应基因的单核苷酸多态性与胰腺癌患者的总生存期相关。
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Apr 1;14(7):2042-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1520.