Meisei University, Sociology, 2-1-1 Hodokubo, Hino-shi, Tokyo 191-8506, Japan.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Aug;73(4):604-614. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.020. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
This study explores the effects of socioeconomic status on depression in Japan, Korea, and China, focusing on the differences in their labor market structures. Comparative studies among East Asian societies allow researchers studying depression to analyze the effects of unique institutions within each society while holding constant, to a certain extent, cultural attitudes toward mental disorders. This study uses data from National Family Research of Japan 2003, Korean National Family Survey 2003, and Family Survey of China 2006 to examine the effects of education and labor market positions on depression. The results show that the relationship between socioeconomic status and depression differs among the three societies. In Japan, the type of employment contract has a significant impact on depression, while in Korea, higher educational attainment negatively relates to depression. In China, the type of work organization has a significant impact on depression. Based on these results, two types of labor market structures, aimed at differentiating the relationship between socioeconomic status and depression, are delineated: labor markets with a secured sector, and flexible labor markets.
这项研究探讨了社会经济地位对日本、韩国和中国抑郁症的影响,重点关注了它们的劳动力市场结构的差异。东亚社会的比较研究使研究抑郁症的研究者能够在一定程度上分析每个社会中独特制度的影响,同时保持对精神障碍的文化态度的一致性。本研究使用了来自日本 2003 年全国家庭调查、韩国 2003 年全国家庭调查和中国 2006 年家庭调查的数据,考察了教育和劳动力市场地位对抑郁症的影响。研究结果表明,社会经济地位与抑郁症之间的关系在这三个社会中存在差异。在日本,雇佣合同的类型对抑郁症有显著影响,而在韩国,较高的教育程度与抑郁症呈负相关。在中国,工作组织的类型对抑郁症有显著影响。基于这些结果,描绘了两种旨在区分社会经济地位与抑郁症之间关系的劳动力市场结构:有保障的部门劳动力市场和灵活的劳动力市场。