• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Guided self-help for functional (psychogenic) symptoms: a randomized controlled efficacy trial.功能性(心因性)症状的引导自助治疗:一项随机对照疗效试验。
Neurology. 2011 Aug 9;77(6):564-72. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318228c0c7. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
2
Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.针对患有分离性癫痫的成年人的认知行为疗法(CODES):一项实用的多中心随机对照试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):491-505. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30128-0. Epub 2020 May 20.
3
Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Depression and Self-Care in Heart Failure Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.心力衰竭患者抑郁症的认知行为疗法与自我护理:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1773-82. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5220.
4
Low-intensity cognitive-behaviour therapy interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder compared to waiting list for therapist-led cognitive-behaviour therapy: 3-arm randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness.与等待接受治疗师主导的认知行为疗法相比,低强度认知行为疗法对强迫症的干预:一项关于临床疗效的三臂随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2017 Jun 27;14(6):e1002337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002337. eCollection 2017 Jun.
5
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
6
Clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of low-intensity interventions in the management of obsessive-compulsive disorder: the Obsessive-Compulsive Treatment Efficacy randomised controlled Trial (OCTET).低强度干预措施治疗强迫症的临床疗效、成本效益及可接受性:强迫症治疗疗效随机对照试验(OCTET)
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jun;21(37):1-132. doi: 10.3310/hta21370.
7
Manualised cognitive-behavioural therapy in treating depression in advanced cancer: the CanTalk RCT.在晚期癌症中治疗抑郁的手册化认知行为疗法:CanTalk RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 May;23(19):1-106. doi: 10.3310/hta23190.
8
Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of guided self-help versus individual cognitive behavioural therapy with a trauma focus for post-traumatic stress disorder (RAPID).创伤后应激障碍的引导自助与个体认知行为疗法的实用随机对照试验(RAPID)。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Nov;27(26):1-141. doi: 10.3310/YTQW8336.
9
Therapist telephone-delivered CBT and web-based CBT compared with treatment as usual in refractory irritable bowel syndrome: the ACTIB three-arm RCT.电话式认知行为疗法和基于网络的认知行为疗法联合常规治疗与常规治疗对照治疗难治性肠易激综合征的 ACTIB 三臂 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Apr;23(17):1-154. doi: 10.3310/hta23170.
10
Cognitive-behavioural therapy compared with standardised medical care for adults with dissociative non-epileptic seizures: the CODES RCT.认知行为疗法对比成人非癫痫性发作的标准化医疗照护:CODES RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jun;25(43):1-144. doi: 10.3310/hta25430.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility trial of a self-help digital intervention for functional cognitive disorder.功能性认知障碍自助数字干预的可行性试验。
Brain Commun. 2025 Jun 19;7(4):fcaf248. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf248. eCollection 2025.
2
Integrating psychiatry and family medicine in the management of somatic symptom disorders: Diagnosis, collaboration, and communication strategies.在躯体症状障碍管理中整合精神病学与家庭医学:诊断、协作及沟通策略
J Gen Fam Med. 2024 Oct 28;26(1):12-18. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.725. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Illness perceptions, experiences of stigma and engagement in functional neurological disorder (FND): exploring the role of multidisciplinary group education sessions.疾病认知、耻辱感体验与功能性神经障碍(FND)的参与度:探索多学科小组教育课程的作用
BMJ Neurol Open. 2024 Jun 5;6(1):e000633. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2024-000633. eCollection 2024.
4
Whole-Body Cryostimulation in Functional Neurological Disorders: A Case Report.功能性神经障碍中的全身冷冻刺激:一例报告
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 28;12(1):71. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010071.
5
COVID-19 and the Physio4FMD trial: Impact, mitigating strategies and analysis plans.2019冠状病毒病与Physio4FMD试验:影响、缓解策略及分析计划
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Jun;33:101124. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101124. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
6
Research trends and frontiers in exercise for movement disorders: A bibliometric analysis of global research from 2010 to 2021.运动障碍运动疗法的研究趋势与前沿:2010年至2021年全球研究的文献计量分析
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Sep 7;14:977100. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.977100. eCollection 2022.
7
Botulinum Toxin Therapy for Oromandibular Dystonia and Other Movement Disorders in the Stomatognathic System.肉毒毒素治疗口颌面部肌张力障碍和口腔颌面部运动障碍。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Apr 14;14(4):282. doi: 10.3390/toxins14040282.
8
Management of Functional Vision Disorders.功能性视觉障碍的管理。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2022 Apr;22(4):265-273. doi: 10.1007/s11910-022-01191-w. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
9
Functional movement disorder and functional seizures: What have we learned from different subtypes of functional neurological disorders?功能性运动障碍和功能性癫痫:我们从功能性神经障碍的不同亚型中学到了什么?
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2021 Nov 26;18:100510. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2021.100510. eCollection 2022.
10
Functional seizures: The patient's perspective of a diagnostic and treatment odyssey.功能性癫痫发作:患者对诊断与治疗历程的看法
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2021 Nov 26;17:100509. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2021.100509. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Symptoms 'unexplained by organic disease' in 1144 new neurology out-patients: how often does the diagnosis change at follow-up?1144 例新神经科门诊患者的“无法用器质性疾病解释的症状”:随访时诊断变化的频率是多少?
Brain. 2009 Oct;132(Pt 10):2878-88. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp220. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
2
Neurology out-patients with symptoms unexplained by disease: illness beliefs and financial benefits predict 1-year outcome.神经内科门诊就诊患者,其症状无法用疾病解释:疾病信念和经济利益可预测 1 年结局。
Psychol Med. 2010 Apr;40(4):689-98. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709990717. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
3
Tailored psychotherapy for patients with functional neurological symptoms: a pilot study.针对功能性神经症状患者的个性化心理治疗:一项试点研究。
J Psychosom Res. 2007 Dec;63(6):625-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.06.013. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
4
Cluster randomised controlled trial of training practices in reattribution for medically unexplained symptoms.针对医学无法解释症状的重新归因训练实践的整群随机对照试验
Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;191:536-42. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.040683.
5
What is the evidence for the efficacy of treatments for somatoform disorders? A critical review of previous intervention studies.躯体形式障碍治疗效果的证据有哪些?对既往干预研究的批判性综述。
Psychosom Med. 2007 Dec;69(9):889-900. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31815b5cf6.
6
Efficacy of treatment for somatoform disorders: a review of randomized controlled trials.躯体形式障碍的治疗效果:随机对照试验综述
Psychosom Med. 2007 Dec;69(9):881-8. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31815b00c4.
7
Effectiveness of a time-limited cognitive behavior therapy type intervention among primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms.限时认知行为疗法类型干预对患有医学无法解释症状的初级保健患者的有效性。
Ann Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;5(4):328-35. doi: 10.1370/afm.702.
8
A randomized controlled trial of brief training in the assessment and treatment of somatization in primary care: effects on patient outcome.一项关于初级保健中躯体化评估与治疗简短培训的随机对照试验:对患者结局的影响。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 Jul-Aug;29(4):364-73. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.03.005.
9
What makes self-help interventions effective in the management of depressive symptoms? Meta-analysis and meta-regression.自助干预措施在抑郁症状管理中有效的原因是什么?荟萃分析和元回归分析。
Psychol Med. 2007 Sep;37(9):1217-28. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707000062. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
10
Cognitive-behavioral therapy for somatization disorder: a randomized controlled trial.躯体化障碍的认知行为疗法:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jul 24;166(14):1512-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.14.1512.

功能性(心因性)症状的引导自助治疗:一项随机对照疗效试验。

Guided self-help for functional (psychogenic) symptoms: a randomized controlled efficacy trial.

机构信息

University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Neurology. 2011 Aug 9;77(6):564-72. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318228c0c7. Epub 2011 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318228c0c7
PMID:21795652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3149156/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Functional (psychogenic or somatoform) symptoms are common in neurology clinics. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) can be an effective treatment, but there are major obstacles to its provision in practice. We tested the hypothesis that adding CBT-based guided self-help (GSH) to the usual care (UC) received by patients improves outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized trial in 2 neurology services in the United Kingdom. Outpatients with functional symptoms (rated by the neurologist as "not at all" or only "somewhat" explained by organic disease) were randomly allocated to UC or UC plus GSH. GSH comprised a self-help manual and 4 half-hour guidance sessions. The primary outcome was self-rated health on a 5-point clinical global improvement scale (CGI) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were measured at 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

In this trial, 127 participants were enrolled, and primary outcome data were collected for 125. Participants allocated to GSH reported greater improvement on the primary outcome (adjusted common odds ratio on the CGI 2.36 [95% confidence interval 1.17-4.74; p = 0.016]). The absolute difference in proportion "better" or "much better" was 13% (number needed to treat was 8). At 6 months the treatment effect was no longer statistically significant on the CGI but was apparent in symptom improvement and in physical functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

CBT-based GSH is feasible to implement and efficacious. Further evaluation is indicated.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that CBT-based GSH therapy improves self-reported general health, as measured by the CGI, in patients with functional neurologic symptoms.

摘要

目的

功能性(心因性或躯体形式)症状在神经科门诊中很常见。认知行为疗法(CBT)可能是一种有效的治疗方法,但在实践中提供 CBT 存在重大障碍。我们检验了这样一个假设,即在患者接受的常规护理(UC)基础上增加基于 CBT 的自助指导(GSH)是否可以改善治疗效果。

方法

我们在英国的 2 个神经病学服务机构进行了一项随机试验。功能性症状(由神经科医生评估为“根本没有”或“只有一些”由器质性疾病解释)的门诊患者被随机分配到 UC 或 UC 加 GSH。GSH 包括自助手册和 4 个半小时的指导课程。主要结局是在 3 个月时用 5 分制临床总体改善量表(CGI)自评健康状况。次要结局在 3 个月和 6 个月时进行测量。

结果

在这项试验中,共纳入了 127 名参与者,其中 125 名参与者收集了主要结局数据。接受 GSH 治疗的参与者在主要结局上报告了更大的改善(CGI 的调整常见比值比为 2.36[95%置信区间为 1.17-4.74;p = 0.016])。“更好”或“好得多”的比例差异为 13%(治疗人数为 8)。在 6 个月时,CGI 上的治疗效果不再具有统计学意义,但在症状改善和身体功能方面仍有明显效果。

结论

基于 CBT 的 GSH 是可行且有效的。需要进一步评估。

证据分类

这项研究提供了 III 级证据,表明基于 CBT 的 GSH 治疗可改善功能性神经症状患者的自我报告总体健康状况,用 CGI 衡量。