White Joseph M, Cannon Jeremy W, Stannard Adam, Spencer Jerry R, Hancock Heather, Williams Ken, Oh John S, Rasmussen Todd E
Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft Sam Houston, Texas, USA.
J Trauma. 2011 Jul;71(1 Suppl):S131-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182219302.
Noncompressible hemorrhage from central vascular injuries remains the leading cause of preventable death in modern combat. This report introduces a large animal model of noncompressible torso hemorrhage, which permits assessment of the various approaches to this problem.
Yorkshire swine were anesthetized and monitoring devices for central aortic pressure, carotid flow, and intracerebral and transcutaneous brain oximetry were applied. Class IV hemorrhagic shock was induced through an iliac arterial injury and animals were subjected to different vascular control methods including thoracic aortic clamping, supraceliac aortic clamping, direct vascular control, and proximal endovascular balloon occlusion. After vascular control, the injury was shunted, and damage control resuscitation was continued. Serum markers, intravenous fluid volumes, and vasopressor requirements were tracked over a subsequent resuscitation period. Postmortem tissue analysis was performed to compare levels of acute ischemic injury between groups.
The protocol for animal preparation, hemorrhage volume, open surgical technique, and posthemorrhage resuscitation was developed using four animals. The endovascular approach was developed using two additional animals. After model development, treatment animals subsequently underwent noncompressible hemorrhage with thoracic aortic clamping, supraceliac aortic clamping, direct vascular control, and endovascular aortic occlusion. Premature death occurred in one animal in the direct vascular control group.
This study presents a large animal model of class IV hemorrhagic shock from noncompressible hemorrhage, which permits comparison of various vascular control methods to address this challenging problem. Future studies using this model as the standard will allow further development of strategies for the management of noncompressible hemorrhage.
现代战争中,中枢血管损伤导致的不可压缩性出血仍是可预防死亡的主要原因。本报告介绍了一种不可压缩性躯干出血的大型动物模型,可用于评估解决该问题的各种方法。
对约克郡猪进行麻醉,并应用监测主动脉中心压、颈动脉血流以及脑内和经皮脑血氧饱和度的装置。通过髂动脉损伤诱导IV级失血性休克,并对动物采用不同的血管控制方法,包括胸主动脉钳夹、腹腔干上主动脉钳夹、直接血管控制和近端血管内球囊闭塞。血管控制后,对损伤进行分流,并继续进行损伤控制复苏。在随后的复苏期内跟踪血清标志物、静脉输液量和血管升压药需求。进行尸检组织分析以比较各组之间的急性缺血性损伤水平。
使用4只动物制定了动物准备、出血量、开放手术技术和出血后复苏的方案。使用另外2只动物开发了血管内方法。模型建立后,治疗动物随后接受了胸主动脉钳夹、腹腔干上主动脉钳夹、直接血管控制和血管内主动脉闭塞的不可压缩性出血。直接血管控制组有1只动物过早死亡。
本研究提出了一种由不可压缩性出血导致IV级失血性休克的大型动物模型,可用于比较各种血管控制方法以解决这一具有挑战性的问题。以该模型为标准的未来研究将有助于进一步开发不可压缩性出血的管理策略。