Eisele Philipp
Med Ges Gesch. 2010;29:185-227.
With its focus on the Franco-German War and World War I the present paper constitutes a first approach to the comprehensive topic of "homoeopathy and war". Sources used include articles from homoeopathic magazines, homoeopathic specialist literature, material from the estate of the homoeopathic lay organization "Hahnemannia" and individual testimonies from non-homoeopaths. The paper begins by examining the importance of the two wars for research into the history of homoeopathy compared to previous conflicts and demonstrates the value of the sources used. A brief outline of homoeopathy and the military forces in the decades before 1870 provides insight into the historical context. This is followed by the investigation of homoeopathic war hospitals at home with an analysis of the attitude of the homoeopathic physicians and lay-healers involved. The paper also describes the difficult relationship between homoeopathy and conventional medicine during the two conflicts.
本文聚焦于普法战争和第一次世界大战,是对“顺势疗法与战争”这一综合主题的首次探讨。所使用的资料来源包括顺势疗法杂志上的文章、顺势疗法专业文献、顺势疗法外行组织“Hahnemannia”的档案资料以及非顺势疗法从业者的个人证词。本文开篇考察了与先前冲突相比,这两场战争对顺势疗法历史研究的重要性,并展示了所使用资料的价值。对1870年之前几十年顺势疗法与军事力量的简要概述有助于洞察历史背景。接下来是对国内顺势疗法战地医院的调查,并分析了相关顺势疗法医生和外行治疗者的态度。本文还描述了这两场冲突期间顺势疗法与传统医学之间的艰难关系。