National Resource Centre for Women's Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital HF, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Jul 28;11:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-55.
The inequity in emergency obstetric care access in Tanzania is unsatisfactory. Despite an existing national obstetric referral system, many birthing women bypass referring facilities and go directly to higher-level care centres. We wanted to compare Caesarean section (CS) rates among women formally referred to a tertiary care centre versus self-referred women, and to assess the effect of referral status on adverse outcomes after CS.
We used data from 21,011 deliveries, drawn from the birth registry of a tertiary hospital in northeastern Tanzania, during 2000-07. Referral status was categorized as self-referred if the woman had bypassed or not accessed referral, or formally-referred if referred by a health worker. Because CS indications were insufficiently registered, we applied the Ten-Group Classification System to determine the CS rate by obstetric group and referral status. Associations between referral status and adverse outcomes after CS delivery were analysed using multiple regression models. Outcome measures were CS, maternal death, obstetric haemorrhage ≥ 750 mL, postpartum stay > 9 days, neonatal death, Apgar score < 7 at 5 min and neonatal ward transfer.
Referral status contributed substantially to the CS rate, which was 55.0% in formally-referred and 26.9% in self-referred birthing women. In both groups, term nulliparous singleton cephalic pregnancies and women with previous scar(s) constituted two thirds of CS deliveries. Low Apgar score (adjusted OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.09-1.86) and neonatal ward transfer (adjusted OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04-1.35) were significantly associated with formal referral. Early neonatal death rates after CS were 1.6% in babies of formally-referred versus 1.2% in babies of self-referred birthing women, a non-significant difference after adjusting for confounding factors (adjusted OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.87-2.16). Absolute neonatal death rates were > 2% after CS in breech, multiple gestation and preterm deliveries in both referral groups.
Women referred for delivery had higher CS rates and poorer neonatal outcomes, suggesting that the formal referral system successfully identifies high-risk birth, although low volume suggests underutilization. High absolute rates of post-CS adverse outcomes among breech, multiple gestation and preterm deliveries suggest the need to target self-referred birthing women for earlier professional intrapartum care.
坦桑尼亚在获得紧急产科护理方面存在不平等现象,这令人不满。尽管存在国家产科转诊系统,但许多分娩妇女绕过转诊机构直接前往更高层级的护理中心。我们想比较正式转诊到三级保健中心的妇女与自行转诊的妇女之间的剖宫产率,并评估转诊状况对剖宫产术后不良结局的影响。
我们使用了 2000-07 年期间坦桑尼亚东北部一家三级医院出生登记处的 21011 例分娩数据。如果妇女绕过或未使用转诊,则将转诊状况归类为自行转诊;如果由卫生工作者转诊,则归类为正式转诊。由于剖宫产指征未充分登记,我们应用了十组分类系统,根据产科组和转诊状况确定剖宫产率。使用多元回归模型分析转诊状况与剖宫产术后不良结局之间的关系。结局指标为剖宫产、产妇死亡、产后出血≥750 毫升、产后住院时间>9 天、新生儿死亡、5 分钟时 Apgar 评分<7 分和新生儿病房转科。
转诊状况对剖宫产率有很大影响,正式转诊的分娩妇女剖宫产率为 55.0%,自行转诊的分娩妇女剖宫产率为 26.9%。在这两个组中,足月初产妇单胎头位妊娠和有既往瘢痕的妇女占剖宫产分娩的三分之二。低 Apgar 评分(调整后的 OR 1.42,95%CI 1.09-1.86)和新生儿病房转科(调整后的 OR 1.18,95%CI 1.04-1.35)与正式转诊显著相关。正式转诊组剖宫产新生儿早期死亡率为 1.6%,自行转诊组为 1.2%,调整混杂因素后差异无统计学意义(调整后的 OR 1.37,95%CI 0.87-2.16)。在这两个转诊组中,臀位、多胎妊娠和早产分娩的剖宫产术后新生儿死亡率均>2%。
转诊分娩的妇女剖宫产率较高,新生儿结局较差,这表明正式转诊系统能够成功识别高危分娩,但低数量表明利用率不足。臀位、多胎妊娠和早产分娩的剖宫产术后不良结局的绝对发生率较高,表明需要针对自行转诊的分娩妇女提供更早的专业分娩期护理。