• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

限制低危妊娠剖宫产率是降低剖宫产率上升趋势的关键:一项观察性研究。

Limiting the caesarean section rate in low risk pregnancies is key to lowering the trend of increased abdominal deliveries: an observational study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Jan 9;12:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-3.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-12-3
PMID:22230339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3267690/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the rate of Caesarean sections (CS) continues to rise in Western countries, it is important to analyze the reasons for this trend and to unravel the underlying motives to perform CS. This research aims to assess the incidence and trend of CS in a population-based birth register in order to identify patient groups with an increasing risk for CS.

METHODS

Data from the Flemish birth register 'Study Centre for Perinatal Epidemiology' (SPE) were used for this historic control comparison. Caesarean sections (CS) from the year 2000 (N = 10540) were compared with those from the year 2008 (N = 14016). By means of the Robson classification, births by Caesarean section were ordered in 10 groups according to mother - and delivery characteristics.

RESULTS

Over a period of eight years, the CS rise is most prominent in women with previous sections and in nulliparous women with a term cephalic in spontaneous labor. The proportion of inductions of labor decreases in favor of elective CS, while the ongoing inductions of labor more often end in non-elective CS.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to turn back the current CS trend, we should focus on low-risk primiparae. Avoiding unnecessary abdominal deliveries in this group will also have a long-term effect, in that the number of repeat CS will be reduced in the future. For the purpose of self-evaluation, peer discussion on the necessity of CS, as well as accurate registration of the main indication for CS are recommended.

摘要

背景

在西方国家,剖宫产率持续上升,因此分析这一趋势的原因并揭示行剖宫产的潜在动机非常重要。本研究旨在评估基于人群的出生登记处的剖宫产率的发生率和趋势,以确定剖宫产风险增加的患者群体。

方法

本研究使用了弗拉芒出生登记处“围产期流行病学研究中心”(SPE)的数据进行历史对照比较。将 2000 年(N=10540)和 2008 年(N=14016)的剖宫产术进行比较。通过 Robson 分类,根据母亲和分娩特征将剖宫产术分娩分为 10 组。

结果

在八年期间,既往剖宫产和自发性分娩足月头位的初产妇的剖宫产率上升最为明显。催产的比例下降,有利于选择性剖宫产,而正在进行的催产更常导致非选择性剖宫产。

结论

为了扭转当前的剖宫产趋势,我们应重点关注低风险的初产妇。避免在该人群中进行不必要的腹部分娩也将产生长期影响,因为未来重复剖宫产的数量将会减少。为了进行自我评估、同行讨论剖宫产的必要性以及准确记录主要剖宫产指征,建议进行上述操作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2308/3267690/713ddbe5c902/1471-2393-12-3-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2308/3267690/42b99cef2d7c/1471-2393-12-3-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2308/3267690/713ddbe5c902/1471-2393-12-3-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2308/3267690/42b99cef2d7c/1471-2393-12-3-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2308/3267690/713ddbe5c902/1471-2393-12-3-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Limiting the caesarean section rate in low risk pregnancies is key to lowering the trend of increased abdominal deliveries: an observational study.限制低危妊娠剖宫产率是降低剖宫产率上升趋势的关键:一项观察性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Jan 9;12:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-3.
2
Caesarean section among referred and self-referred birthing women: a cohort study from a tertiary hospital, northeastern Tanzania.转诊和自荐产妇剖宫产术:坦桑尼亚东北部一所三级医院的队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Jul 28;11:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-55.
3
Caesarean section following induction of labour in uncomplicated first births- a population-based cross-sectional analysis of 42,950 births.初产妇无并发症引产术后剖宫产——基于人群的42950例分娩横断面分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Apr 27;16:92. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0869-0.
4
Using the Robson Classification to Explain the Fluctuations in Cesarean Section.运用罗伯逊分类法解释剖宫产率的波动。
J Pregnancy. 2020 Nov 12;2020:2793296. doi: 10.1155/2020/2793296. eCollection 2020.
5
Caesarean section rates: applying the modified ten-group Robson classification in an Australian tertiary hospital.剖宫产率:在澳大利亚一所三级医院应用改良的 Robson 十组分类法。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jan;42(1):61-66. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1873923. Epub 2021 May 2.
6
Back to "once a caesarean: always a caesarean"? A trend analysis in Switzerland.回归“一次剖宫产,永远剖宫产”?瑞士的趋势分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Nov;294(5):905-910. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4055-4. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
7
Theory of obstetrics: an epidemiologic framework for justifying medically indicated early delivery.产科学理论:为医学指征性早产提供依据的流行病学框架。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007 Mar 28;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-4.
8
Increasing caesarean section rates among low-risk groups: a panel study classifying deliveries according to Robson at a university hospital in Tanzania.提高低危人群剖宫产率:坦桑尼亚某大学医院按照 Robson 分类法对分娩进行分组的面板研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 May 8;13:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-107.
9
Variation in hospital caesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort study.足月初产妇剖宫产率及产科结局的差异:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BJOG. 2015 Apr;122(5):702-11. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13281. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
10
Contribution of select maternal groups to temporal trends in rates of caesarean section.特定产妇群体对剖宫产率时间趋势的贡献。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 Jul;32(7):633-41. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34566-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of oxycodone for the treatment of acute postoperative pain in cesarean section: A review.羟考酮用于剖宫产术后急性疼痛治疗的效果:一项综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 21;104(8):e41645. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041645.
2
Review of socioeconomic risk factors for cesarean births: a population-based study.剖宫产的社会经济风险因素综述:基于人群的研究。
Acta Biomed. 2023 Jun 14;94(3):e2023082. doi: 10.23750/abm.v94i3.13907.
3
Effects of cord clamping timing in at-term elective cesarean section on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a randomized trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.当代美国的剖宫产实践。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;203(4):326.e1-326.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.058. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
2
Racial and ethnic disparities in the trends in primary cesarean delivery based on indications.基于指征的初次剖宫产分娩趋势中的种族和族裔差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;201(4):422.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.062.
3
Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor.
足月择期剖宫产时脐带结扎时机对母婴结局的影响:一项随机试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 May;309(5):1883-1891. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07054-0. Epub 2023 May 10.
4
Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic surgery used for the excision of villus tissue and the repair of uterine scar in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy-II.腹腔镜手术用于剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者绒毛组织切除及子宫瘢痕修复的临床疗效-II。
Med Int (Lond). 2022 Jul 26;2(4):23. doi: 10.3892/mi.2022.48. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
5
Using the Robson Classification to Explain the Fluctuations in Cesarean Section.运用罗伯逊分类法解释剖宫产率的波动。
J Pregnancy. 2020 Nov 12;2020:2793296. doi: 10.1155/2020/2793296. eCollection 2020.
6
Comparison of early and on-demand maternal feeding after Caesarean delivery: a prospective randomised trial.剖宫产术后即刻与按需母乳喂养的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Singapore Med J. 2021 Oct;62(10):542-545. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2020096. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
7
The effect of advanced maternal age on perinatal outcomes in nulliparous singleton pregnancies.高龄产妇对初产单胎妊娠围产结局的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1984-x.
8
Analysis of caesarean sections using Robson 10-group classification system in a university hospital in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚东部某大学医院采用罗布森10组分类系统对剖宫产进行分析:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 4;8(4):e020520. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020520.
9
Possible relationship between general and pregnancy-related anxiety during the first half of pregnancy and the birth process: a prospective cohort study.孕早期一般焦虑和妊娠相关焦虑与分娩过程之间的潜在关系:一项前瞻性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2017 May 9;7(5):e013413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013413.
10
Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.对于低风险初产妇分娩,独立助产单元是产科单元的安全替代选择吗?一项匹配队列研究中按产次分析效应差异。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 9;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1208-1.
使用十组分类法对国际剖宫产率进行比较分析,发现自然分娩存在显著差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;201(3):308.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.021.
4
Introducing caesarean section audit in a regional teaching hospital in The Netherlands.在荷兰一家地区教学医院引入剖宫产审计。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Aug;139(2):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
5
A history of caesarean section: from ancient world to the modern era.剖宫产史:从古代到现代
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Oct;47(5):357-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00757.x.
6
Public health implications of cesarean on demand.按需剖宫产对公共卫生的影响。
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2006 Dec;61(12):807-15. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000248826.44123.73.
7
A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles.一项关于首次体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射周期中选择性单胚胎移植与双胚胎移植的真实前瞻性健康经济学研究。
Hum Reprod. 2004 Apr;19(4):917-23. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh188. Epub 2004 Feb 27.
8
Elective primary cesarean delivery.择期剖宫产分娩
N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 6;348(10):946-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb022734.
9
Putting elective cesarean into perspective.
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;99(6):967-8. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02026-4.
10
Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?我们能降低剖宫产率吗?
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001 Feb;15(1):179-94. doi: 10.1053/beog.2000.0156.