Suppr超能文献

确保社区心理健康中心的质量。对精神科实践指南的需求。

Assuring quality in community mental health centers. The need for psychiatric practice guidelines.

作者信息

Clark G H

机构信息

Behavioral Services, Saint Vincent Health Center, Erie, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1990 Mar;13(1):113-25.

PMID:2179902
Abstract

Many have expressed concern regarding both the deterioration in the quality of patient care provided by CMHCs and the exodus of competent psychiatrists from them. Earlier efforts by the Joint Commission to serve as an accrediting body for CMHCs were ineffective. Two factors may well have contributed to this. First, the Joint Commission's community mental health "Principles" were not medically based and, therefore, may not have been sufficiently able to assure quality of care, especially for the seriously mentally ill. Secondly, the "Principles" did not enjoy widespread use among CMHCs. Heretofore, CMHCs have not been required to meet national accrediting standards to qualify for governmental and other third-party reimbursement. Tying reimbursement to a meaningful accreditation process, as is done for hospitals, would solve the latter problem. Redressing the former problem might be accomplished by incorporating guidelines for psychiatric practice, such as those proposed in this article, into JCAHO's and CARF's accreditation standards for CMHCs. Such standards would then, by linking authority to responsibility, provide the CMHC psychiatrist with a foundation upon which to reasonably practice and thereby assure quality patient care. Although 55% of CMHCs were headed by psychiatrists in 1971, only 8% had psychiatrist CEOs as of 1985. Although psychiatrists need not be administratively in charge of CMHCs, the importance of their clinical leadership role is undeniable. Yet, in many centers, this role has been sorely compromised. It is anticipated that a clearer delineation of the psychiatrist's and, more specifically, the medical director's role will benefit all involved: patients, families, psychiatrists, other clinical staff, executive directors, and CMHC boards of directors. Centers that have strong psychiatric leadership will clearly benefit in three ways: (1) liability risk will be kept to a minimum; (2) recruitment and retention of competent psychiatrists will be enhanced; and (3) with CMHCs remaining clearly in the medical mainstream, they will be assured of continued governmental and other third-party healthcare funding. O'Leary, President of JCAHO, writes the following: The Joint Commission has never placed a direct role in the development of clinical standards, and we do not intend to begin now. But we do urge appropriate specialty groups to establish this task as a high priority. While consensus standards are inherently imperfect, they do reflect unique collections of wisdom and experience.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

许多人对社区精神卫生中心(CMHCs)提供的患者护理质量下降以及合格精神科医生从中流失表示担忧。联合委员会此前作为CMHCs认证机构所做的努力并未取得成效。可能有两个因素导致了这种情况。首先,联合委员会的社区精神卫生“原则”并非基于医学,因此可能不足以确保护理质量,尤其是对严重精神疾病患者而言。其次,这些“原则”在CMHCs中并未得到广泛应用。迄今为止,CMHCs并不需要达到国家认证标准以获得政府及其他第三方报销资格。像对医院那样,将报销与有意义的认证过程挂钩,将解决后一个问题。解决前一个问题可以通过将精神科实践指南(比如本文所提议的那些)纳入医疗机构评审联合委员会(JCAHO)和康复设施认证委员会(CARF)针对CMHCs的认证标准来实现。这样的标准通过将权力与责任联系起来,将为CMHCs的精神科医生提供合理执业的基础,从而确保高质量的患者护理。1971年时,55%的CMHCs由精神科医生领导,但截至1985年,只有8%的CMHCs首席执行官是精神科医生。虽然精神科医生不一定需要对CMHCs进行行政管理,但他们临床领导角色的重要性是不可否认的。然而,在许多中心,这一角色受到了严重损害。预计更清晰地界定精神科医生,更具体地说是医疗主任的角色,将使所有相关方受益:患者、家属、精神科医生、其他临床工作人员、执行董事以及CMHCs的董事会。拥有强大精神科领导力的中心显然将在三个方面受益:(1)责任风险将降至最低;(2)吸引和留住合格精神科医生的能力将得到增强;(3)由于CMHCs始终明确处于医学主流,它们将确保能持续获得政府及其他第三方医疗保健资金。JCAHO主席奥利里写道:联合委员会从未在临床标准的制定中直接发挥作用,我们现在也不打算这样做。但我们确实敦促相关专业团体将这项任务列为高度优先事项。虽然共识标准本身并不完美,但它们确实反映了独特的智慧和经验集合。(摘要截选至400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验