• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多学科面部功能诊所的疗效。

Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary facial function clinic.

机构信息

Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2011 Oct;25(10):1360-4. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.183. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1038/eye.2011.183
PMID:21799520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3194328/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the usefulness of a multidisciplinary facial function clinic (FFC).

DESIGN

Retrospective case-note review.

SETTING

The FFC was established in July 2006 at the Manchester Royal Eye Hospital with attending consultants from Ophthalmology, Skull-Base Otolaryngology, Plastic Surgery, and Physiotherapy.

PARTICIPANTS

We retrospectively reviewed the case notes for 59 consecutive patients seen at the FFC from July 2006 to February 2009.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We documented demographic data, including distance travelled and average journey time.

RESULTS

The 59 patients (mean age 46 years) made a total of 106 clinical visits (mean 1.8). The mean distance travelled by a patient was 31.9 miles with an estimated journey time of 47 min, each way. At presentation the average House-Brackmann grade of facial nerve weakness was IV. Ophthalmologist's advice was needed for 58 (98.3%), otolaryngologist's for 57 (96.6%), plastic surgeon for 49 (83.0%), physiotherapist for 58 (98.3%), and 4 (6.8%) were referred for psychological counselling. In all, 47 (79.7%) of our patients needed input from all four consultants during their visit at the FFC. By combining the presence of several consultants in one clinic, we saved an average of 5.1 visits (325.4 miles; 8 h travel time) for each patient.

CONCLUSION

We and our patients feel our multidisciplinary facial function clinic has been an effective service and has continued to work.

摘要

目的

分析多学科面部功能诊所(FFC)的效用。

设计

回顾性病历审查。

地点

FFC 于 2006 年 7 月在曼彻斯特皇家眼科医院成立,有来自眼科、颅底耳鼻喉科、整形外科和物理治疗的顾问参加。

参与者

我们回顾了 2006 年 7 月至 2009 年 2 月在 FFC 就诊的 59 例连续患者的病历。

主要观察指标

我们记录了人口统计学数据,包括旅行距离和平均旅行时间。

结果

59 例患者(平均年龄 46 岁)共进行了 106 次临床就诊(平均 1.8 次)。每位患者的平均旅行距离为 31.9 英里,估计往返行程时间为 47 分钟。就诊时,面神经无力的平均 House-Brackmann 分级为 IV 级。需要眼科医生的建议 58 例(98.3%),耳鼻喉科医生的建议 57 例(96.6%),整形外科医生的建议 49 例(83.0%),物理治疗师的建议 58 例(98.3%),4 例(6.8%)转诊进行心理咨询。在所有患者中,有 47 例(79.7%)在 FFC 就诊期间需要四位顾问的共同参与。通过将几位顾问集中在一个诊所,我们为每位患者平均节省了 5.1 次就诊(325.4 英里;8 小时旅行时间)。

结论

我们和我们的患者都认为我们的多学科面部功能诊所是一种有效的服务,并一直在运作。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary facial function clinic.多学科面部功能诊所的疗效。
Eye (Lond). 2011 Oct;25(10):1360-4. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.183. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
2
Management outcomes of facial nerve tumors: comparative outcomes with observation, CyberKnife, and surgical management.面神经肿瘤的治疗结果:观察、CyberKnife 和手术治疗的对比结果。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Sep;147(3):525-30. doi: 10.1177/0194599812446686. Epub 2012 May 7.
3
Facial schwannoma: results of a large case series and review.面部神经鞘瘤:一个大型病例系列的结果及综述
J Laryngol Otol. 2008 Nov;122(11):1139-50. doi: 10.1017/S0022215107000667. Epub 2008 Jan 7.
4
Clinical and radiological guidance in managing facial nerve schwannomas.面神经鞘瘤管理中的临床与影像学指导
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jun;36(5):892-5. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000612.
5
Comparison of facial nerve function results after translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approach in medium-sized tumors.中型肿瘤经迷路后和乙状窦后入路面神经功能结果的比较。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Apr;129(4):429-31. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.4.429.
6
Outcomes of facial nerve grafting in 155 cases: predictive value of history and preoperative function.155 例面神经移植术的结果:病史和术前功能的预测价值。
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Oct;32(8):1341-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822e952d.
7
Fragmented care of facial fractures.面部骨折的碎片化治疗。
J Trauma. 1987 May;27(5):477-82. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198705000-00003.
8
Development of the Alberta facial clinical evaluation scale: A patient-centred outcomes instrument for facial nerve paralysis.阿尔伯塔面部临床评估量表的制定:面神经麻痹的以患者为中心的结局评估工具。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2019 Nov;44(6):919-926. doi: 10.1111/coa.13400. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
9
Quality of life after facial nerve repair.面神经修复后的生活质量。
Laryngoscope. 2007 Mar;117(3):421-6. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31802d83df.
10
[Multidisciplinary approach of facial injuries].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2017;161:D1537.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgery versus radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: Shared decision making in a multidisciplinary clinic.前庭神经鞘瘤的手术与放射外科治疗:多学科诊所中的共同决策
Neurooncol Adv. 2023 Jul 19;5(1):vdad089. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad089. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Teamwork in skull base surgery: An avenue for improvement in patient care.颅底手术中的团队合作:改善患者护理的途径。
Surg Neurol Int. 2013 Mar 25;4:36. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.109527. Print 2013.
3
Botulinum toxin to improve lower facial symmetry in facial nerve palsy.肉毒毒素改善面神经麻痹下面部对称性。
Eye (Lond). 2012 Nov;26(11):1431-6. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.189. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Creating a Culture for Interdisciplinary Collaborative Professional Practice.营造跨学科协作专业实践的文化氛围。
Med Educ Online. 2005 Dec;10(1):4387. doi: 10.3402/meo.v10i.4387.
2
Team processes and team care for children with developmental disabilities.针对发育障碍儿童的团队流程与团队照护。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2008 Dec;55(6):1375-90, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2008.09.002.
3
Collaborative and interdisciplinary health care teams: ready or not?协作式跨学科医疗团队:准备好了吗?
J Prof Nurs. 2008 Jul-Aug;24(4):218-27. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.06.013.
4
Toward transdisciplinary research: historical and contemporary perspectives.迈向跨学科研究:历史与当代视角
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S225-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.005.
5
Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science.衡量团队科学中的合作与跨学科整合。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S151-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.020.
6
Enhancing multiple disciplinary teamwork.加强多学科团队合作。
Nurs Outlook. 2008 May-Jun;56(3):108-114.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.03.013.
7
From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary research: a case study.从跨学科研究到跨领域研究:一项案例研究
Qual Health Res. 2008 Apr;18(4):557-64. doi: 10.1177/1049732307308514.
8
Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement.卫生研究、服务、教育及政策中的多学科性、跨学科性和超学科性:2. 促进因素、障碍及强化策略
Clin Invest Med. 2007;30(6):E224-32. doi: 10.25011/cim.v30i6.2950.
9
Criteria for successful multiprofessional cooperation in palliative care teams.姑息治疗团队成功开展多专业合作的标准。
Palliat Med. 2007 Jun;21(4):347-54. doi: 10.1177/0269216307078505.
10
Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness.健康研究、服务、教育及政策中的多学科性、跨学科性和超学科性:1. 定义、目标及有效性证据
Clin Invest Med. 2006 Dec;29(6):351-64.