Suppr超能文献

预防胜于治疗?卫生消费者和患者组织与公共卫生。

Prevention better than cure? Health consumer and patients' organisations and public health.

机构信息

Health Policy Research Unit, Hugh Aston Building, De Montfort University, Leicester LE2 7BQ, United Kingdom; Department of Politics and Public Policy, Hugh Aston Building, De Montfort University, Leicester LE2 7BQ, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2011 Aug;73(4):530-534. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.028. Epub 2011 Jul 8.

Abstract

Previous studies of groups representing patients, users and carers in the UK indicate that their principal focus is on health care and treatment services. In recent years, UK government policy has emphasised prevention and health promotion as part of its wider public health agenda. This paper investigates how this might have affected health consumer and patients' organisations (HCPOs) by presenting findings from an online survey of 312 UK groups undertaken in the summer of 2010. The sample was identified using the publicly available membership lists of a number of large alliance organisations. The survey achieved a 39% response rate. The findings suggest that the main focus of lobbying and campaigning remains on health care rather than public health issues. However, a significant minority of groups stated they prioritised public health campaigning and lobbying. Possible explanations for engagement with the public health agenda include: the presence of public health on the government's agenda, the influence of other, more powerful interests in the health policy process, and growing awareness among groups of health promotion, prevention and environmental causes of illness. The paper argues that although HCPOs may be more active in the public health policy arena, more research is needed - notably with regard to their relationship with devolved governments, EU institutions and the current UK government's public health and voluntary sector agenda. The reasons why some groups engage more than others with the public health agenda also merit closer investigation. Moreover, not enough is currently known about the influence of HCPOs on the public health agenda and policies in this field.

摘要

先前针对英国患者、使用者和护理人员代表团体进行的研究表明,他们的主要关注点是医疗保健和治疗服务。近年来,英国政府的政策强调了预防和健康促进,将其作为更广泛的公共卫生议程的一部分。本文通过展示 2010 年夏季对 312 个英国团体进行的在线调查结果,调查了这对健康消费者和患者组织(HCPO)可能产生的影响。该样本是使用一些大型联盟组织的公开会员名单确定的。调查的回应率为 39%。调查结果表明,游说和宣传的主要重点仍然是医疗保健,而不是公共卫生问题。然而,少数团体表示,他们将公共卫生宣传和游说作为优先事项。参与公共卫生议程的可能原因包括:公共卫生在政府议程中的存在、其他更强大利益在卫生政策制定过程中的影响,以及团体对健康促进、预防和疾病环境原因的认识不断提高。本文认为,尽管 HCPO 可能在公共卫生政策领域更加活跃,但需要进行更多的研究——特别是关于它们与权力下放政府、欧盟机构和当前英国政府的公共卫生和志愿部门议程的关系。一些团体比其他团体更积极地参与公共卫生议程的原因也值得更深入的调查。此外,目前对于 HCPO 对公共卫生议程和该领域政策的影响知之甚少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验