Suppr超能文献

代表谁?英国卫生消费者和患者组织在政策制定过程中的作用

Representing Whom? U.K. Health Consumer and Patients' Organizations in the Policy Process.

作者信息

Baggott Rob, Jones Kathryn L

机构信息

Health Policy Research Unit, Department of Politics and Public Policy Hugh Aston Building, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK.

出版信息

J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):341-349. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9859-4. Epub 2018 May 25.

Abstract

This paper draws on nearly two decades of research on health consumer and patients' organizations (HCPOs) in the United Kingdom. In particular, it addresses questions of representation and legitimacy in the health policy process. HCPOs claim to represent the collective interests of patients and others such as relatives and carers. At times they also make claims to represent the wider public interest. Employing Pitkin's classic typology of formalistic, descriptive, symbolic, and substantive representation, the paper explores how and in what sense HCPOs represent their constituencies. We found that policymakers themselves are less concerned with formal mechanisms adopted by groups and are more concerned with credibility, in particular whether HCPOs carry the confidence of their constituents. While some concerns about legitimacy remain, particularly in relation to funding from commercial interests, we argue that HCPOs bring a unique perspective to the policy process and to focus purely on formalistic representation provides only a partial understanding of their representative role and a constrained view of their collective moral claims.

摘要

本文借鉴了近二十年来对英国健康消费者和患者组织(HCPOs)的研究。特别是,它探讨了健康政策过程中的代表性和合法性问题。HCPOs声称代表患者以及亲属和护理人员等其他人的集体利益。有时,它们还声称代表更广泛的公共利益。本文运用皮特金关于形式主义、描述性、象征性和实质性代表的经典类型学,探讨了HCPOs如何以及在何种意义上代表其选民。我们发现,政策制定者本身不太关注团体采用的形式机制,而更关注可信度,特别是HCPOs是否获得其选民的信任。虽然对合法性仍存在一些担忧,特别是在商业利益资金方面,但我们认为,HCPOs为政策过程带来了独特的视角,纯粹关注形式主义代表只能部分理解其代表作用,并限制对其集体道德主张的看法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验