Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Stauffacherstrasse 78, CH-3014 Bern, Switzerland.
J Biomech. 2011 Sep 2;44(13):2351-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
Traumatic injuries of the spine are mostly the consequence of rapid overload e.g. impact loading. In vitro investigations on this topic usually encompass biomechanical testing using frozen/thawed specimens and employ quasi-static loading conditions. It is generally accepted that a freezing/thawing cycle does not alter mechanical properties for slow loading rates. However, this has never been investigated for high impact velocities. In order to assess the effects of freezing/thawing and the influence of different impact velocities, we loaded 27 fresh and 15 frozen/thawed cadaveric rabbit spinal segments (intervertebral disc with one third of the adjacent vertebrae) with different impact energies and velocities using a custom-made, dropped-weight loading device. Endplate fractures were assessed by micro-CT scans. Specimen dimensions (disk, bone, and total height) and vertebrae bone density (BV/TV) were compared pre- and post-trauma. Energy absorption by spinal segments was quantified by measuring the initial ball rebound. We found that freezing/thawing increased endplate fracture frequency and decreased the energy absorption of the segments. Higher impact velocities increased the energy absorption, while higher impact energy increased both energy absorption and fracture frequency. Two conclusions are drawn: first, under impact loading, freezing alters permanently the biomechanical response, and second, for different impact velocities, different fracture initiation mechanisms apply. Therefore, quasi-static loading of frozen/thawed spinal segments is not a valid model for traumatic endplate injuries. However, caution should be exercised in extrapolating these findings to human vertebrae until tests on larger vertebrae are performed.
脊柱创伤主要是快速过载的结果,例如冲击负荷。关于这个主题的体外研究通常包括使用冷冻/解冻标本的生物力学测试,并采用准静态加载条件。人们普遍认为,冷冻/解冻循环不会改变缓慢加载速率下的机械性能。然而,这从未在高冲击速度下进行过研究。为了评估冷冻/解冻的影响以及不同冲击速度的影响,我们使用定制的落体加载装置对 27 个新鲜和 15 个冷冻/解冻的兔脊柱段(带一个相邻椎体的三分之一椎间盘)进行了不同冲击能量和速度的加载。通过微 CT 扫描评估终板骨折。比较了创伤前后标本的尺寸(椎间盘、骨和总高度)和椎体骨密度(BV/TV)。通过测量初始球的回弹来量化脊柱段的能量吸收。我们发现冷冻/解冻增加了终板骨折的频率,降低了节段的能量吸收。较高的冲击速度增加了能量吸收,而较高的冲击能量增加了能量吸收和骨折频率。得出两个结论:首先,在冲击载荷下,冷冻会永久改变生物力学响应;其次,对于不同的冲击速度,会应用不同的骨折起始机制。因此,冷冻/解冻脊柱段的准静态加载不是外伤性终板损伤的有效模型。然而,在对更大的椎体进行测试之前,将这些发现推断到人椎体时应谨慎行事。