• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度地下水市场对用水效率的影响:数据包络分析方法。

Impact of groundwater markets in India on water use efficiency: a data envelopment analysis approach.

机构信息

Institute for Agricultural Policy and Market Research, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Senckenbergstr. 3, D-35390 Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2011 Nov;92(11):2924-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.001
PMID:21803479
Abstract

In the hard rock areas of India, overdraft of groundwater has led to negative externalities. It increased costs of groundwater irrigation and caused welfare losses. At the same time informal groundwater markets are slowly emerging and are believed to improve water distribution and to increase water use efficiency in the irrigation sector. These claims are evaluated in this study. For this purpose data was collected from a sample containing three different groups of water users: water sellers, water buyers and a control group of non-traders. First the socio-economic characteristics of these groups are compared. Then the efficiency of water use of the three groups is studied using Data Envelopment Analysis. The results indicate that groundwater markets provide resource poor farmers access to irrigation water, giving them the opportunity to raise their productivity. Water buyers are furthermore shown to be most efficient in their water use, while water sellers are also shown to be more efficient than the control group. The differences in efficiency between the groups are statistically significant. The demonstrated potential of groundwater markets to improve the efficiency of water use and to increase equity in resource access should be taken into account by the Indian government when deciding on their attitude towards the emerging groundwater markets.

摘要

在印度的硬岩地区,地下水超采导致了负面的外部性。它增加了地下水灌溉的成本,并造成了福利损失。与此同时,非正式的地下水市场正在缓慢出现,据信这将改善水资源分配,并提高灌溉部门的用水效率。本研究对这些说法进行了评估。为此,从一个包含三组不同用水者的样本中收集了数据:卖水者、买水者和非交易者的对照组。首先比较了这些群体的社会经济特征。然后,利用数据包络分析研究了三组的用水效率。结果表明,地下水市场为资源匮乏的农民提供了灌溉用水,使他们有机会提高生产力。此外,买水者在用水方面效率最高,而卖水者的效率也高于对照组。这些群体之间的效率差异具有统计学意义。印度政府在决定对新兴地下水市场的态度时,应该考虑到地下水市场在提高用水效率和增加资源获取公平性方面的潜力。

相似文献

1
Impact of groundwater markets in India on water use efficiency: a data envelopment analysis approach.印度地下水市场对用水效率的影响:数据包络分析方法。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Nov;92(11):2924-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
2
Can the informal groundwater markets improve water use efficiency and equity? Evidence from a semi-arid region of Pakistan.非正式地下水市场能否提高用水效率和公平性?来自巴基斯坦半干旱地区的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 May 20;666:849-857. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.266. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
3
Irrigation pricing policies and its impact on agricultural inputs demand in Tunisia: a DEA-based methodology.突尼斯的灌溉定价政策及其对农业投入需求的影响:基于 DEA 的方法。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Sep;92(9):2109-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.013. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
4
Estimating irrigation water demand in the Moroccan Drâa Valley using contingent valuation.使用条件价值评估法估算摩洛哥德拉河谷的灌溉用水需求。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Oct;92(10):2803-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.027. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
5
Do buyers have bargaining power? Evidence from informal groundwater contracts.买家是否拥有议价能力?来自非正式地下水合同的证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 30;15(9):e0236696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236696. eCollection 2020.
6
The economic impact of restricted water supply: a computable general equilibrium analysis.供水受限的经济影响:可计算一般均衡分析
Water Res. 2007 Apr;41(8):1799-813. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
7
Factors controlling the salinity in groundwater in parts of Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, India.印度安得拉邦贡图尔区部分地区控制地下水盐度的因素。
Environ Monit Assess. 2008 Mar;138(1-3):327-41. doi: 10.1007/s10661-007-9801-4. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
8
Measuring efficiency of cotton cultivation in Pakistan: a restricted production frontier study.衡量巴基斯坦棉花种植效率:一项受限生产前沿研究。
J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Nov;94(14):3038-45. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6652. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
9
Groundwater resource assessment, categories, and typologies: case study, Andhra Pradesh, India.地下水资源评估、分类和类型学:以印度安得拉邦为例。
Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Feb;173(1-4):777-88. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1422-7. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
10
Are small-scale irrigators water use efficient? Evidence from lake Naivasha basin, Kenya.小规模灌溉者的用水效率高吗?来自肯尼亚奈瓦沙湖盆地的证据。
Environ Manage. 2013 Nov;52(5):1192-201. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0146-1. Epub 2013 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of "Three Red Lines" Water Policy (2011) on Water Usage Efficiency, Production Technology Heterogeneity, and Determinant of Water Productivity Change in China.“三条红线”水政策(2011 年)对中国用水效率、生产技术异质性和水生产率变化决定因素的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 8;19(24):16459. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416459.
2
Spatial and Temporal Differences in the Green Efficiency of Water Resources in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and Their Influencing Factors.长江经济带水资源绿色效率的时空差异及其影响因素
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 17;18(6):3101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063101.
3
Do buyers have bargaining power? Evidence from informal groundwater contracts.
买家是否拥有议价能力?来自非正式地下水合同的证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 30;15(9):e0236696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236696. eCollection 2020.
4
Evaluation of industrial water use efficiency considering pollutant discharge in China.考虑中国污染物排放的工业用水效率评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 27;14(8):e0221363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221363. eCollection 2019.
5
Are participants in markets for water rights more efficient in the use of water than non-participants? A case study for Limarí Valley (Chile).水权市场的参与者在水资源利用方面是否比非参与者更高效?以利马里河谷(智利)为例的一项案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jun;23(11):10665-10678. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6187-2. Epub 2016 Feb 17.